Non-serialized receivers?

[JagerDog]

It bans property legally owned before the law was enacted. Sounds like "taking" without compensation to me. Where are the lawsuits? NRA is basically worthless.

What damages are you planning on suing for, the law is not in effect yet. It has effected nobody.

^^^Yes. You need a damaged plaintiff Jr.

[sigstroker]

What damages are you planning on suing for, the law is not in effect yet. It has effected nobody.

It was signed by the governor.

The damages are "it's unConstitutional".

[Cali-Glock]

As I understand the law, with the exception of NFA firearms, until the GCA of 1968 there was no law on the books requiring that firearms have serial numbers.

[Caligula36]

Nevada is what happens when conservatives think they can just move away from the problem.

[jaymz]

It was signed by the governor.

The damages are "it's unConstitutional".

[xmikex]

? NRA is basically worthless.

This has been true for a while. As long as they get your contributions without having to actually do anything they will keep doing it.

[LBDamned]

it can go to court and can be ruled on prior to effective date.

Just happened in AZ with mask mandates in schools.

[realbadlarry]

[LBDamned]

Fun fact: There are more Californians in Nevada than native born Nevadans.

that's awful

[Wherryj]

it can go to court and can be ruled on prior to effective date.

Just happened in AZ with mask mandates in schools.

The court may or may not hear the actual case before the law is in effect, but an injunction is always possible if the group filing the suit can prove that there would be a significant harm if the law is allowed to take effect.

Unfortunately, courts often refuse to hear it because no one has "standing". We saw this with the election fraud. The courts refused to hear the case before the election because "no one had been harmed yet because the election hadn't happened yet-so you don't have standing" then the same courts refused to hear the cases because "the election results were already available so it was too late-you don't have standing".

[Wherryj]

Fun fact: There are more Californians in Nevada than native born Nevadans.

You can likely say the same about CA. I'll leave it to you to guess which group is likely to have the plurality, however.

[Wherryj]

Sure, but they will get some people to turn in their "evil weapons of mass destruction" which will be destroyed before the courts rule upon it so the politicians will see it as a "win".

Even if there are punitive fines and the state is forced to pay losses to those affected, it's "only tax payer money" so no big loss for the politicians, right?

[Redeyedrider]

Pre 1969 (when they didn't have to be seralized) are exempt.

How can you tell the date of manufacture on a weapon w/o a s/n

[Quiet]

Sucks for folks who home built and registered with the NFA (SBR, suppressor, etc). Looks like they're hosed

Firearms that are serial numbered/registered under Federal laws are exempt from this restriction.
^BATFE approved Title 2 firearms meet this requirement.

[Quiet]

So what happens if someone lives in Utah and has a old hunting rifle without a serial number. Are they no longer allowed to hunt in Nevada? What if they are paying through Nevada to another state?

No exemptions for non-residents of NV.

These new NV laws applies to any person that transport them into NV and possess them in NV.

Firearms exempt from this are those that are made by a FFL or is a Federally defined antique firearm or is a Federally defined C&R firearm.