Is this CA legal?

[Elshauno]

The Recover 20/20 doesn’t have a stock, barrel shroud or forward grip ( one is available though)

The MCK has a barrel shroud

[Robert1234]

The range I go to everyone looks at each others stuff and we offer them to shoot too, share my steel targets if they want.

I don't go up to people telling them their stuff is legal/illegal, believe me, outdoor ranges are the wild west and about 1/5th of the stuff is not even free state approved.

We chat about how I do want one but I'm too scurrred about the legality and if they can tell me how they got it. For me, the MCK 2.0 is the better system. I just don't want to lose all my limited gun rights.

And I'm not advocating violating any laws, or putting yourself in danger of arrest, do what you have to do to stay safe and out of jail.

But FFS, we as a community need to get out of the mentality of absolute compliance, and stop making the enforcement of these ridiculous and unconstitutional laws easier for the leftists and their minions, or worse, helping them enforce them.

[Robert1234]

if you came up to me at a range going off about how my gun is illegal, Id tell you to mind your own freaking business.

For your own sake, you might also want to pack up your stuff and head out, because "Karen" won't be stopped by admonitions to mind their own business. They'll be on the phone like good little Quislings, turning you in, and probably also getting your license plate for the authorities. Likely videoing you as you drive away.

We as a community have become our own worst enemies.

[kennymallory1]

[I Swan]

Through the ejaculation port, while sitting in your prison cell.

[ohsmily]

Since you’re right, Can you show me the second handgrip?

Lol. Move the goal post much? This is what you linked to and I commented on.

https://www.recovertactical.com/product/recover-tactical-20-20-stabilizer-kit-for-glock-also-umarex-cybergun/

You were unaware of PC30515(a)(4)(B) and went fishing around for a pic when you realized. Even the one you sent is arguably problematic when paired with a brace due to the ergonomics of using that large, deep rail section as a handgrip when shouldering (which shouldn't be done anyway) the brace. Anyway, the primary pic of that product when you click on the link you originally showed and which I commented on is an AW under 30515/30605...now you know.

[Robert1234]

Lol. Move the goal post much? This is what you linked to and I commented on.

https://www.recovertactical.com/product/recover-tactical-20-20-stabilizer-kit-for-glock-also-umarex-cybergun/

You were unaware of PC30515(a)(4)(B) and went fishing around for a pic when you realized. Even the one you sent is arguably problematic when paired with a brace due to the ergonomics of using that large, deep rail section as a handgrip when shouldering (which shouldn't be done anyway) the brace. Anyway, the primary pic of that product when you click on the link you originally showed and which I commented on is an AW under 30515/30605...now you know.

That vertical foregrip is problematic.

Shouldering the brace is not. I refuse to comply with non-existent laws because "it might send the wrong message", or "it might inflame anti-gun types". Allowing ourselves to be marginalized as a community is how we ended up in the gun control mess we're in now.