Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Invisible rifle mag

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #31
    AregularGuy
    Veteran Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 2792

    If they were not issued ammo then you know there was no credible threat of some sort of mass attack.
    All posts dedicated to the memory of Stronzo Bestiale

    "You want my sister but now scam my Glocks too?
    How about my sister? what can she do now? Still virgin and need Glcok."

    ---ARegularGuy

    NRA Patron Member

    Comment

    • #32
      kurac
      Veteran Member
      • Dec 2005
      • 2917

      Lets face it, our govt has gone rogue. The Biden camp could not have pulled off the election steal without the help of the federal govt. If the feds put half as much effort into investigating election fraud as they have been to these individuals who served a no-knock warrant on the capitol building, the election results would have been overturned by now.
      www.culinagrips.com
      "custom grips for shooters by shooters"

      Comment

      • #33
        Beagle
        Member
        • Jul 2010
        • 370

        Originally posted by sbo80
        That's not legally accurate. These soldiers are not deployed under Title 10 (which covers the legal use of lethal force for combat soldiers, including in self defense). Deployment inside the United States is under different law.
        National Guard Regulation 500-5/Air National Guard Instruction 10-208

        National Guard Domestic Law Enforcement Support and Mission Assurance Operations

        "National Guard support to civil law enforcement mission. DOD policy and guidance is
        summarized below to provide a basic understanding of the use of force.

        (1) The right of self defense. Military forces have the right of self defense."

        Comment

        Working...
        UA-8071174-1