Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

ATF vs Q honey badger

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • car15
    Member
    • Jan 2006
    • 494

    ATF vs Q honey badger

    I'm hearing pistols sold by Q are now SBRs.
  • #2
    SoldierLife7
    Joe Exotic For President
    CGN Contributor
    • Apr 2013
    • 2420

    Source?

    Comment

    • #3
      edgerly779
      CGN/CGSSA Contributor
      CGN Contributor
      • Aug 2009
      • 19871

      Says who?

      Comment

      • #4
        plumbum
        Calguns Addict
        • May 2010
        • 5394

        Specific pistols are being considered SBR’s by the ATF - not braces specifically.

        The Honey Badger, and two similar models are being called SBR’s because of all of their individual nuances.
        Originally posted by ysr_racer
        Please don't bring logic and reason into an interwebs discussion

        Comment

        • #5
          speedrrracer
          Veteran Member
          • Dec 2011
          • 3355

          ATF Rules Q’s Honey Badger Pistol is a Short Barrel Rifle
          Q, makers of the Honey Badger pistol, has just issued the following notice to its customers: Dear Customer: On August 3rd, 2020, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“ATF”) issued Q® a formal Cease & Desist letter, notifying us that ATF has taken the position that the Q Honey Badger Pistol is a short-barreled ... Read more


          Q is fighting it, but if you own an AR pistol with a pistol brace, you might wanna stay tuned

          Comment

          • #6
            elSquid
            In Memoriam
            • Aug 2007
            • 11844

            The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“ATF”) recently informed firearm manufacturer Q, LLC that, in ATF’s view, Q’s “Honey Badger” pistol with stabilizing brace is actually a short-barreled rifle and therefore subject to the National Firearms Act (“NFA”).


            -- Michael

            Comment

            • #7
              SkyHawk
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Sep 2012
              • 23525

              Yep was just coming here to post the news. These braces were always a dance with the devil, even more so in CA.
              Last edited by SkyHawk; 10-06-2020, 6:42 PM.
              Click here for my iTrader Feedback thread: https://www.calguns.net/forum/market...r-feedback-100

              Comment

              • #8
                The War Wagon
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Apr 2011
                • 10294

                SBR needs to be dropped from the NFA registry altogether.
                sigpic

                Comment

                • #9
                  Erion929
                  Veteran Member
                  • Jan 2013
                  • 4706

                  Join Active Junky for online rebates....$10 to both you and me!

                  https://www.activejunky.com/invite/238017


                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Endless
                    Banned
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 1881

                    Originally posted by SkyHawk
                    Yep was just coming here to post the news. These braces were always a dance with the devil, even more so in CA.
                    In Arizona they aren't and state police won't enforce. Just spoke with them today. Same thing with Maine State Police. They don't give a **** about some opinion letter.

                    It's not considered law. It's an opinion. That's all.

                    The Noveske Ghettoblaster is next I bet.

                    NFA needs to go.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      BajaJames83
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Jun 2011
                      • 6037

                      The NFA is a joke and time for it to go.
                      NRA Endowment Life Member
                      USMC 2001-2012

                      Never make yourself too available or useful...... Semper Fidelis

                      John Dickerson: What keeps you awake at night?
                      James Mattis: Nothing, I keep other people awake at night.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        pythonfan
                        CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                        CGN Contributor
                        • Jan 2012
                        • 1926

                        Yeah title is misleading. They CURRENTLY are not going after braces in general. They are going after particular pistols with a brace with an LOP longer than 13" while simultaneously having an OAL extended shorter than 26" and is capable of firing in that configuration. I dont agree with their ruling, but this is their reasoning.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          IVC
                          I need a LIFE!!
                          • Jul 2010
                          • 17621

                          Originally posted by The War Wagon
                          SBR needs to be dropped from the NFA registry altogether.
                          Originally posted by BajaJames83
                          The NFA is a joke and time for it to go.
                          Agreed - suppressors and SBR/SBS restrictions need to go. Handguns are way more concealable than SBR/SBS which was the argument for their restriction in the first place.

                          Let's get Amy Coney Barrett confirmed and then see how the 2A jurisprudence evolves over the next decade...
                          sigpicNRA Benefactor Member

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            jcwatchdog
                            Veteran Member
                            • Aug 2012
                            • 2605

                            So is it just not possible to remove the pistol brace and just have a regular buffer tube? It looks kind of strange, like the brace is somehow part of the gun, but I would think it could be removed and just be a pistol.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              IVC
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • Jul 2010
                              • 17621

                              Braces are used as stocks. I have never seen a single person use the brace as intended. That's what opens it up for interpretation, particularly in gun-hating jurisdictions such as CA.

                              Not a good idea to have it installed, whether technically legal or not. Just too much risk even if you end up cleared in the court in the end...
                              sigpicNRA Benefactor Member

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1