Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Highest Store Price Gougers

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tabascoz28
    Veteran Member
    • Mar 2016
    • 3364

    Highest Store Price Gougers

    Capture.jpg
  • #2
    Beelzy
    Calguns Addict
    • Apr 2008
    • 9224

    Wow, primers....the relaoaders 401k.
    "I kill things for a living, don't make yourself one of them"

    Comment

    • #3
      sirgrumps
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 2494

      Wow, I’m shocked it’s not CTD leading the pack here.
      ?The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not a ?second-class right,? subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.? ?.. "We know of no other constitutional rights that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need."
      - Justice Clarence Thomas

      Comment

      • #4
        pythonfan
        CGN/CGSSA Contributor
        CGN Contributor
        • Jan 2012
        • 1920

        Oh but they are. Cheaper than dirt email recently.
        Attached Files

        Comment

        • #5
          tabascoz28
          Veteran Member
          • Mar 2016
          • 3364

          CTD 55/9 = 6.1
          LG 135/23 = 5.9

          Correct.

          Comment

          • #6
            SG29736
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2009
            • 1082

            But 5% off!

            Comment

            • #7
              tabascoz28
              Veteran Member
              • Mar 2016
              • 3364

              They wanted to undercut CTD.

              Comment

              • #8
                oakdalecurtis
                Junior Member
                • Aug 2013
                • 84

                Go ahead and roast me, I'm ready, and right.
                In a free market, we have a choice of whether or not to make a purchase of an item. The buyer has the power. If an item is in short supply, the price will rise for several beneficial reasons.
                1. On the demand side, the higher price will limit over purchasing of a limited item, making the item available to more people.
                2. On the supply side, the higher price will signal producers of the item to send more of the item to the higher price areas.
                No purchase is mandatory (car insurance excluded). It is a free market. If you don't like the price, don't buy the item. That will signal the sellers that their accumulating inventory is overpriced and they will lower the price or accumulate inventory. Using the term "price gouging" shows a fundamental lack of understanding of how free markets should and do properly operate in times of shortage.

                Comment

                • #9
                  faterikcartman
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 1404

                  I am not your lawyer. I am not giving you or anyone else who reads my posts legal advice. I am making off-the-cuff comments that may or may not be accurate and are personal, not professional, opinion. If you think you need a lawyer please retain a qualified attorney in your jurisdiction. Your local bar association may be able to help if you need a referral.

                  Two Weeks!: http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/a...p/t-59936.html

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    tabascoz28
                    Veteran Member
                    • Mar 2016
                    • 3364

                    You're not wrong about the free market and supply/demand economics, but we have many systems in the U.S. at play.

                    Your example of car insurance illustrates that for the greater good, just like maybe healthcare, when everyone is insured, the burden of catastrophic fluctuation in personal liability is lessened.

                    So for unimportant things like maybe TP, masks and ammo, the gov doesn't need to get involved.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Citadelgrad87
                      I need a LIFE!!
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 16875

                      Originally posted by oakdalecurtis
                      Go ahead and roast me, I'm ready, and right.
                      In a free market, we have a choice of whether or not to make a purchase of an item. The buyer has the power. If an item is in short supply, the price will rise for several beneficial reasons.
                      1. On the demand side, the higher price will limit over purchasing of a limited item, making the item available to more people.
                      2. On the supply side, the higher price will signal producers of the item to send more of the item to the higher price areas.
                      No purchase is mandatory (car insurance excluded). It is a free market. If you don't like the price, don't buy the item. That will signal the sellers that their accumulating inventory is overpriced and they will lower the price or accumulate inventory. Using the term "price gouging" shows a fundamental lack of understanding of how free markets should and do properly operate in times of shortage.
                      No, you're wrong.

                      Discussing prices is not a threat to a free market, and, indeed, is part of the forces that can act to drive prices downward.

                      Why do people who want to pretend they understand economics seem to universally, and incorrectly, attack conversations about high prices as somehow anti capitalism?
                      Originally posted by tony270
                      It's easy to be a keyboard warrior, you would melt like wax in front of me, you wouldn't be able to move your lips.
                      Originally posted by repubconserv
                      Print it out and frame it for all I care
                      Originally posted by el chivo
                      I don't need to think at all..
                      Originally posted by pjsig
                      You are talking to someone who already won this lame conversation, not a brick a wall. Too bad you don't realize it.
                      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                      sigpic

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        pythonfan
                        CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                        CGN Contributor
                        • Jan 2012
                        • 1920

                        It is a free market and they do have every right to increase pricing for any reason. Usually its to cover overhead due to shortages of inventory. We also have a choice to decide how much of an increase we are willing to buy at. Personally I havent spent a dime at CTD since I saw them selling tula steel cased 9mm for $69.95 for 50 rounds in 2013.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          edgerly779
                          CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                          CGN Contributor
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 19871

                          Marshall Range and training $108 for ppt dros.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            sirgrumps
                            Senior Member
                            • Apr 2009
                            • 2494

                            Originally posted by tabascoz28
                            CTD 55/9 = 6.1
                            LG 135/23 = 5.9

                            Correct.
                            I stand corrected.



                            ?The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not a ?second-class right,? subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.? ?.. "We know of no other constitutional rights that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need."
                            - Justice Clarence Thomas

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              n8vrmind
                              Senior Member
                              • Dec 2017
                              • 1468

                              Originally posted by Citadelgrad87
                              No, you're wrong.



                              Discussing prices is not a threat to a free market, and, indeed, is part of the forces that can act to drive prices downward.



                              Why do people who want to pretend they understand economics seem to universally, and incorrectly, attack conversations about high prices as somehow anti capitalism?
                              I do find these price discussions to be amusing... perhaps a bit of schadenfreude at people who failed to learn from past events or previously anti2A democrats who are no scrambling to find guns and ammo.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1