Ammo law as applied (from the Rhode thread in 2A Litigation)

[RickD427]

I would argue that those records are created each time the database is used. It will be easy enough to find that number. And every time someone is denied, they have to send them a letter notifying them of why. So, how many letters have they created?

I've filed federal FOIA requests before, and the California law is modeled after the federal law. These questions would not be considered as improper if asked of the federal DOJ.

You seem to think that someone there needs to run a report like the one I'm asking for for there to be a "record" I can request. I don't think you're correct, but we'll find out who's right.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Hoystory,

We're now well past the time frame for the state to reply to your Public Records Act request.

What did you receive back?

[hoystory]

Hoystory,



We're now well past the time frame for the state to reply to your Public Records Act request.



What did you receive back?

I've received two letters requesting more time to respond. Nothing substantive yet.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[RickD427]

I've received two letters requesting more time to respond. Nothing substantive yet.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Thanks for the update. That's a mixed sign. It could mean that they're reading your request broadly and may respond in the spirit of the law. The PRA does allow for a single time extension to respond to complex request, but they're even beyond that extended date now.