Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Brownell's new AR-180

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #46
    beanz2
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Nov 2008
    • 12032

    Originally posted by 1911su16b870
    Received mine! Only drawback is the dust cover flips down and partially interferes with the top of the magazine release button...which explains why Armalite moved the mag release down in the original AR-18 and simply made a slot/cut in the OEM GI magazines.

    Built it up on a Spikes lower, 4-40 set screw on the rear take-down spring and KNS rear M1913 rail. Using the Sig MCX skeleton stock as I like them!
    Lucky dog! I'm still on the wait list for the 10.5" upper.

    I'm in no rush, though. Waiting for BigRix to come up with the BRN-180 Fusion Lower:





    Who knows what the brace options will be then.
    .
    sigpic
    The wife will be pissed, but Jesus always forgives.

    Comment

    • #47
      The Gleam
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Feb 2011
      • 13171

      Originally posted by beanz2

      I'm in no rush, though. Waiting for BigRix to come up with the BRN-180 Fusion Lower:





      .
      That looks good.

      I got my AR180 safety and other needed small parts from BigRix when NDS came out with their AR180 receiver meant for the AR180-B, but which I adapted to use an original AR180 Costa Mesa upper.

      I would definitely prefer that above over a standard cut AR15 receiver.
      -----------------------------------------------
      Originally posted by Librarian
      What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

      If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

      Comment

      Working...
      UA-8071174-1