Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

NRA leadership needs to be Sacked.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #31
    FF90
    Member
    • Jul 2014
    • 158

    Tell Us, USMC16A2 "universal back round checks, on all purchases, non-recorded." how do you enforce a no records kept - background check???
    require a id card per gun issued by an FFL and showing the owners name??
    or how would this work?

    Comment

    • #32
      Citadelgrad87
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Mar 2007
      • 16892

      Originally posted by USMCM16A2
      Folks,



      The leadership of the NRA is not keeping up with the times. I know all the die-hards are going to say "not one inch" but a well constructed "something" needs to be done. Just this morning what was in the news, 4 more young people gunned down by some ****ing mental case.
      A 29 year old with mental illness, who has run ins with the police. Was arrested on the grounds of the White House. who had all of his firearms taken, but his father gave them back. The old approach of LaPierre and his fossilized cronies is just not working.
      I have said this before, and I will say it again. That universal back round checks, on all purchases, non-recorded. Just a check to make sure that the persons involved are eligible. Wait the few minutes, NICS check your on your way. No record kept.
      Furthermore, severe penalties for those individuals and agencies that do not report ineligibility to the NICS system. Criminal and civil. Firearms prohibitions for the mentally ill, and relinquishing of all firearms. And penalties for the persons that give firearms to prohibited persons.
      There are ways to protect the 2A rights of people, and keep firearms out of the hands of those that should not. But its going to take big balls on the NRA's part. The decrepit leadership needs to be sacked, and the division needs to stop. And the power of the NRA used to further the 2A, and further the cause of ending, reducing gun violence. A2
      Could not disagree more. If we "do something" and, surprise, a mental case kills under then existing laws, guess what, you have conceded that doing "something" to restrict gun ownership by law abiding citizens is an appropriate reaction.

      It isn't.
      Originally posted by tony270
      It's easy to be a keyboard warrior, you would melt like wax in front of me, you wouldn't be able to move your lips.
      Originally posted by repubconserv
      Print it out and frame it for all I care
      Originally posted by el chivo
      I don't need to think at all..
      Originally posted by pjsig
      You are talking to someone who already won this lame conversation, not a brick a wall. Too bad you don't realize it.
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
      sigpic

      Comment

      • #33
        SAD338
        Banned
        • Mar 2018
        • 580

        I don't see how it's the NRA's fault that his guns were taken away from him twice and returned to him by his father twice.

        Comment

        • #34
          madjack956
          Veteran Member
          • Jan 2006
          • 2617

          Originally posted by daveinwoodland
          Not sure why this would fall on the NRA leadership. His Father gave him back weapons he was not supposed to have so if anything the blame should fall there.
          There is unfortunately no 100% solution to keep someone from doing these acts. No one wants them to happen but the truth is in our current society they will continue no matter what laws are in place.
          This right here^^^. "Something" needs to be done with all the kneejerk "blame the NRA " people in this world.

          Especially the ones that claim they are pro-gun.

          His father knew better than anybody including the cops and NRA his son had major issues, but gave him the guns back anyway.
          Paralyzed Veterans of America www.pva.org

          Comment

          • #35
            Subotai
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Jun 2010
            • 11289

            All vehicles need governers that prevent going over 10 mph.
            RKBA Clock: soap box, ballot box, jury box, cartridge box (Say When!)
            Free Vespuchia!

            Comment

            • #36
              Bigtwin
              Veteran Member
              • May 2010
              • 2639

              Troll... that is the only logical explanation here.
              NRA MEMBER

              Comment

              • #37
                onelonehorseman
                Veteran Member
                • Oct 2012
                • 4888

                Originally posted by USMCM16A2
                Folks,



                The leadership of the NRA is not keeping up with the times. I know all the die-hards are going to say "not one inch" but a well constructed "something" needs to be done. Just this morning what was in the news, 4 more young people gunned down by some ****ing mental case.
                A 29 year old with mental illness, who has run ins with the police. Was arrested on the grounds of the White House. who had all of his firearms taken, but his father gave them back. The old approach of LaPierre and his fossilized cronies is just not working.
                I have said this before, and I will say it again. That universal back round checks, on all purchases, non-recorded. Just a check to make sure that the persons involved are eligible. Wait the few minutes, NICS check your on your way. No record kept.
                Furthermore, severe penalties for those individuals and agencies that do not report ineligibility to the NICS system. Criminal and civil. Firearms prohibitions for the mentally ill, and relinquishing of all firearms. And penalties for the persons that give firearms to prohibited persons.
                There are ways to protect the 2A rights of people, and keep firearms out of the hands of those that should not. But its going to take big balls on the NRA's part. The decrepit leadership needs to be sacked, and the division needs to stop. And the power of the NRA used to further the 2A, and further the cause of ending, reducing gun violence. A2
                Without getting into a discussion of universal background checks in, and of, themselves . . . .

                I am not following how the background checks you propose would have affected the outcome of the tragedy you refer to.

                I also fail to see how the NRA bears any ownership (either as an immediate cause or a root cause).
                sigpic

                Comment

                • #38
                  madjack956
                  Veteran Member
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 2617

                  [QUOTE=unusedusername;21558084]Appeasement is a failed strategy as well. I suggest that NRA leadership could suggest compromises that are real, meaning we get something back. A possibility could universal background checks without records in exchange for shall-issue national CCW.[/QUOTE]

                  I got a better idea. How about they give us shall issue national ccw and that's it.
                  They get nothing! Wouldn't that be refreshing. We get something, and they get nothing for a change.

                  And the something that we get, is something that is rightfully ours anyway, protected supposedly by the bill of rights.
                  Paralyzed Veterans of America www.pva.org

                  Comment

                  • #39
                    madjack956
                    Veteran Member
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 2617

                    Are you reading the same posts I am? Because I don't see any pro feedback.

                    It would be nice if you would answer the question in post #25.
                    Paralyzed Veterans of America www.pva.org

                    Comment

                    • #40
                      gforce357
                      Member
                      • Jan 2018
                      • 222

                      Originally posted by ACfixer
                      I'm assuming all 700 people killed in Chicago last would have benefited from the background checks, right OP? Just like the liberal media, you are ignoring the real problem and bowing down to the sensational stories.

                      The NRA had nothing to do with this, it has nothing to do with any of the publicized killings.
                      This.

                      Comment

                      • #41
                        OlderThanDirt
                        FUBAR
                        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                        • Jun 2009
                        • 5866

                        The NRA is not the problem. How about:

                        - the demise of the nuclear family
                        - the almost complete lack of personal responsibility
                        - the failure .gov to deal with mental health issues
                        - the failure of .gov to do their job

                        It's bad enough that this country is headed down a path to a complete socialist nanny state devoid of personal responsibility, but the consistent failure of numerous government agencies to do their jobs has been a significant factor in almost every recent mass shooting.

                        The NRA cannot fix the retards that our society is creating, nor can it make .gov agencies enforce existing laws. The NRA leadership needs to hold firm in the face of massive societal and government failures. Giving up anything just puts more people at risk of being victims of violent sociopaths.

                        Thanks A2. Now I feel like I have to go out and buy another firearm, or at least take a shower.
                        We know they are lying, they know they are lying, they know we know they are lying, we know they know we know they are lying, but they are still lying. ~ Solzhenitsyn
                        Thermidorian Reaction . . Prepare for it.

                        Comment

                        • #42
                          readysetgo
                          CGSSA Coordinator
                          • Aug 2011
                          • 8689

                          You'd have to have a sack, first, to put them in. Since some of you don't, well...
                          Stand up and be counted, or lay down and be mounted... -Mac

                          Comment

                          • #43
                            leadchucker
                            Senior Member
                            • Apr 2009
                            • 622

                            Originally posted by USMCM16A2
                            I know all the die-hards are going to say "not one inch" but a well constructed "something" needs to be done.
                            Let's start with the First Amendment. There need to be background checks and censorship. "Something" needs to be done to prevent inflammatory threads like this from being started.
                            Last edited by leadchucker; 04-23-2018, 2:46 PM.

                            Comment

                            • #44
                              Barang
                              CGN Contributor
                              • Aug 2013
                              • 12352

                              "A 29 year old with mental illness, who has run ins with the police. Was arrested on the grounds of the White House. who had all of his firearms taken, but his father gave them back."

                              So who is the problem here?

                              Comment

                              • #45
                                leadchucker
                                Senior Member
                                • Apr 2009
                                • 622

                                Originally posted by OlderThanDirt
                                - the failure of .gov to do their job
                                This is the biggest of all. Their primary purpose and function under a Constitutional Republic is to safeguard our rights. They've been failing miserably as we have become more of a pure, "majority-rule" democracy, where public opinion overrides inalienable rights.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1