...

[mshill]

I'd say if he's worried then don't buy ppt.

PPT where I live is simple.. Meet someone, checkout the gun, maybe chat with the seller abit... Can do a bill of sale... Don't have to. Buy it..drive away..
No registration.. Simple

The California mindset makes people worry too much.

Exactly my thoughts as I witnessed my son purchase a handgun in a Walmart parking lot in Utah. Get a copy (picture) of the Bill of Sale if you are worried.

[Ubermcoupe]

Count me in the "know by your gut" group, but...

http://www.hotgunz.com/

Based on self-reported serials and by no means comprehensive, but i've seen it floated from time to time.

[FalconLair]

Nv is no longer a free state.

how so?

i've been here going on 3 years now and it's amazing the difference between NV and CA

[nitroxdiver]

Here we shake hands, exchange money for private property, shake hands again, and leave. If your gut tells you he's a ****bag, walk away. Would your buddy run serial numbers on a used lawn mower or dewalt drill off Craigslist?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[2shotjoe]

how so?

i've been here going on 3 years now and it's amazing the difference between NV and CA

Private part transfers require background checks at ffl

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[dwalker]

Private part transfers require background checks at ffl

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

My understanding is that law was struck down.

[mshill]

Private part transfers require background checks at ffl

My understanding is that law was struck down.

While the Nevada Question 1 passed, requiring background checks on all firearm transfers, the enforcement is blocked:

https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_Backg...estion_1_(2016)

Enforcement blocked

On December 28, 2016, Attorney General Adam Paul Laxalt (R) said the initiative could not be enforced due to the refusal of the FBI to participate in the expanded background checks. Question 1 was designed to require background checks for firearm transfers between unlicensed individuals, also known as private-party sales, which would take place through the FBI's National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICBCS). According to a letter from the FBI to Nevada, "the recent passage of the Nevada legislation [Question 1] regarding background checks for private sales cannot dictate how federal resources are applied." Furthermore, Nevada is one of 12 states with a state-run background checks system and does not depend on the FBI to perform existing background checks.[1]

The FBI suggested that the Nevada Department of Public Safety's Criminal History Repository (CHR) conduct the background checks of private-party sales and transfers. However, Attorney General Laxalt concluded that such a move would violate the initiative's language. The CHR is responsible for other background checks in Nevada.[2] He stated, "The Act is very specific that the only background check it authorizes for a private sale or transfer is directly through the FBI."

ETA: All this after Bloomberg pissed away $3.5 million and Everytown $14.5 million and wrote an unenforceable law. That's just too bad.

[sfe187]

...

[sfe187]

...

[dwalker]

Just curious . . . checks and balances, dot the i cross the t doesn't appeal to free state residents? You wouldn't look into steps or investigate all possible channels to prevent you buying a stolen gun? Not only money is at stake but just the drama and aftermath of dealing with the law. I do respect your casualness but I don't believe all free state residents are this causal.

NO.

If I feel bad about the deal, I dont do it, buying or selling. Have bought a lot of guns in the parking lot at Bass Pro or Home depot. Just bought a Beretta 1301 in the parking lot at a gas station, a couple days after I bought a handgun at a parking lot at another gas station.

[Grumpyoldretiredcop]

Just curious . . . checks and balances, dot the i cross the t doesn't appeal to free state residents? You wouldn't look into steps or investigate all possible channels to prevent you buying a stolen gun? Not only money is at stake but just the drama and aftermath of dealing with the law. I do respect your casualness but I don't believe all free state residents are this causal.

NO! It's intrusive, unnecessary and leads to what you have to deal with in CA. Back to your hole, Bloomberg troll.

[sfe187]

...

[Bigtwin]

I remember doing face to face sales in CA, back when it was legal.

[FalconLair]

Private part transfers require background checks at ffl

that did get shot down 2shot - i agree, the law did pass but the AG declared it unenforceable, but yes, they tried

there were several 'ordinances' restricting gun carry/transport in some areas of Las Vegas, including North Las Vegas that were struck down in June of 2015, abolished from the books

we've actually gained on our gun rights here in the last 2 years 2shot, they even got rid of the Blue Card system, which was a Clark County handgun registration requirement

i won't say they're not trying, but we still have good numbers here when it comes to our gun rights, plus, protections within the Nevada State Constitution too

[AreWeFree]

Just curious . . . checks and balances, dot the i cross the t doesn't appeal to free state residents? You wouldn't look into steps or investigate all possible channels to prevent you buying a stolen gun? Not only money is at stake but just the drama and aftermath of dealing with the law. I do respect your casualness but I don't believe all free state residents are this causal.

How do you check for stolen property at garage sales, flee markets, craigslist, ebay? Do you check the invoices of your local mom & pop stores? Have you researched your birthday/Christmas gifts? Do you record yourself at night to make sure you aren't sleep stealing?

Guns are plain normal regular property, like cars, tools, furniture, appliances, electronics, art, baseball cards, clothes, whatever.