Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Seems many are prepping & unloading AR's & like

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #46
    alfred1222
    Calguns Addict
    • Jan 2010
    • 7331

    Originally posted by MarikinaMan
    Youre gonna have to start putting the lowers in their names to be sure they can own them. I'm thinking the same thing. As soon as the countdown begins, I may just transfer all my AR's ownerships to my son.
    My families trust owns all of our guns. They are transferred to the trust as soon as we recieve them, and the trust never dies. As long as we keep registering new trustees, no gun ban can touch us. The whole concept of "no passing down guns" is gone. All of our guns belong to an entity that never expires, while we trustees merely use them.
    Originally posted by Kestryll
    This guy is a complete and total idiot.
    /thread.

    ΦΑ

    Comment

    • #47
      HumedoNino
      Banned
      • Jun 2016
      • 177

      Definitely a buyers market. I will buy your $500 AR and in a few months I'll sell it for tripple that. Only a fool would sell.

      Comment

      • #48
        Whiskey_Tango
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2014
        • 1588

        Originally posted by Devilmonkey89
        Fools like BojackUSMC. That has given into pressure.
        You sure you don't mean USMCM16A2?

        Comment

        • #49
          CandG
          Spent $299 for this text!
          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
          • Apr 2014
          • 16970

          If you owned WAAAAAAY more AR's than you could ever use in your lifetime, and I mean WAAAAY more, like 300+, then I suppose I could see someone selling some AR's now to hedge against the possibility that they can't sell them later. But if you only own less than like 10 AR's, you'd be crazy to sell now. Or is making a quick buck really worth risking sacrificing (more of) your 2a rights for the rest of your life?
          Settle down, folks. The new "ghost gun" regulations probably don't do what you think they do.


          Comment

          • #50
            CandG
            Spent $299 for this text!
            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
            • Apr 2014
            • 16970

            Originally posted by Whiskey_Tango
            You sure you don't mean USMCM16A2?
            That would be my guess, too. Specifically, this thread.

            I dunno, all you Marines look the same j/k

            I wonder how often I give that poor calgunner CockedAndLocked a bad reputation. I'm guessing almost daily
            Last edited by CandG; 06-28-2016, 12:36 PM.
            Settle down, folks. The new "ghost gun" regulations probably don't do what you think they do.


            Comment

            • #51
              ARDude
              Veteran Member
              • May 2006
              • 2723

              Originally posted by cockedandglocked
              That would be my guess, too. Specifically, this thread.

              I dunno, all you Marines look the same j/k

              I wonder how often I give that poor calgunner CockedAndLocked a bad reputation. I'm guessing almost daily
              There was another thread started by him after the one you listed, that got him banned and the thread was removed....
              Real-life Girls

              Comment

              • #52
                CandG
                Spent $299 for this text!
                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                • Apr 2014
                • 16970

                Originally posted by ARDude
                There was another thread started by him after the one you listed, that got him banned and the thread was removed....
                Ah, I see... lotta people saying he was starting to sound a little unstable. DysfunctionalVet 2.0
                Settle down, folks. The new "ghost gun" regulations probably don't do what you think they do.


                Comment

                • #53
                  ScottsBad
                  Progressives Suck!
                  CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                  • May 2009
                  • 5610

                  Originally posted by elk hunter
                  I tend to agree with you on the don't sell part of this, I only sell some to finance another one. But why do you think that out of state buyers would be interested in taking the California banned guns off your hands? Other states have more access to the proposed banned items than Californians do, so unless they are offered at a massive discount price why would we be interested in them? We can buy unmodified/not bastardized rifles unrestricted and all we want for good prices right now. California modified magazines are less than worthless to us as we use standard capacity. The market is just as saturated here as it is there.
                  The point is you can still sell it. The bullet button is not a major mod. And you can always part it out if necessary. Your not going to get top dollar unless it's a factory rifle anyway. Most people put their home built ARs up for sale and expect to get what they put into it. That's a fantasy.
                  sigpicC'mon man, shouldn't we ban Democracks from Cal-Guns? Or at least send them to re-education camps.

                  Comment

                  • #54
                    OCEANCRITTER
                    Member
                    • Mar 2013
                    • 306

                    Ammo and components...



                    Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

                    Comment

                    • #55
                      jstert
                      Member
                      • May 2016
                      • 435

                      Originally posted by alfred1222
                      My families trust owns all of our guns. They are transferred to the trust as soon as we recieve them, and the trust never dies. As long as we keep registering new trustees, no gun ban can touch us. The whole concept of "no passing down guns" is gone. All of our guns belong to an entity that never expires, while we trustees merely use them.


                      with all due respect, i doubt that a trust will protect guns in a ban. if the 2nd amendment can be trashed then nothing is safe, especially a mere piece of paper.


                      Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

                      Comment

                      • #56
                        erik_26
                        Veteran Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 3907

                        Originally posted by jstert
                        with all due respect, i doubt that a trust will protect guns in a ban. if the 2nd amendment can be trashed then nothing is safe, especially a mere piece of paper.


                        Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
                        The 2A can only be trashed if you acknowledge and follow an unconstitutional law prohibiting it.

                        They can only take from you what you let them.
                        Signature required

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        UA-8071174-1