I came across this and went into it assuming the worse but actually didn't think it was that bad. Curious what you guys think.
General idea is there are and will always be too many guns to confiscate so rather than trying to eliminate guns, require mandatory training (described as a state militia reserve of sorts).
On one hand, I take the second amendment as a right without any qualifications required. On the other hand, I wouldn't mind free training myself, and I wouldn't mind knowing the guy on the line next to me has been trained as well.
Thoughts?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
General idea is there are and will always be too many guns to confiscate so rather than trying to eliminate guns, require mandatory training (described as a state militia reserve of sorts).
On one hand, I take the second amendment as a right without any qualifications required. On the other hand, I wouldn't mind free training myself, and I wouldn't mind knowing the guy on the line next to me has been trained as well.
Thoughts?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



Comment