Moved from MI to CA

[Messerschmitts]

OP, what the hell are you doing here? We're all trying to leave but many of us can't due to jobs. You are not working. If you want sun, go move to Albuquerque. Gun laws here are terrible. You're not a citizen here, you're a subject. Gun ownership here is a privilege, not a right.

[AceGirlsHusband]

I suspect that if it is brand-new in the case, the firearm is safe, is it not? Or do I overstate the obvious?

Troy

That is one of the questions on the Firearms Safety Certificate exam: "If a firearm is brand-new, still in the case, the firearm is safe. True or False?"

[SkyHawk]

Ok so here's something. I brought my 9 guns from MI here to CA. I purchased them in MI, and now I live here. I filed the required CA firearm app. when I arrived and paid my $19.00 fee. On it it stipulated that I needed a CA Handgun Safety Certificate, but I was not purchasing, I already purchased them

Congratulations Captain - you filled out and filed the wrong form

The form you were supposed to fill out says nothing at all about needing a FSC or HSC, it doesn't even have a spot for it. Because as you said, a new resident bringing their guns here wouldn't have one. You probably filled out VolReg or Oplaw.

The next time you move here, use this correct form:

http://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/firearms/forms/ab991frm.pdf

Welcome to Calguns

[AreWeFree]

Oopps, I forgot. Meesa no liken Firearm Safety Certificate.

I suspect that if it is brand-new in the case, the firearm is safe, is it not? Or do I overstate the obvious?

It is just hard coming from a community where hunting, outdoors, camping, the environment and personal liberty are top priorities. Here in the Golden State, not so much. Here it's a steal to litter, $500-$1000. In MI it was way higher. Here we have faux environmental issues. That's fine have it your way but I gotta tell ya CA is a majority of one on many issues.

Also this issue of the candidates who get the top votes no longer partisan. I see it as a way to stack the legislature one way or another. Whose idea was this?

No I am not rich, and I won't be any time soon because of the status quo of the Bastords in the Labor Department who dictate the rules governing unemployment. I'm pretty sure that they are living comfortable lives while workers are not.

Case in point, Unemployment Insurance is not paid by workers, but by the employers so they use lobbies to make the rules where they save money where they can. One being if you quit, you don't get unemployment. That's my case. But if you get fired you are entitled to UI. How is this fair?

I spent nearly 16 years living and working in MI and when I quit my job, I was denied UI. Believe it or not, it is part of your compensation. I received a letter annually describing what salary I received and the other compensation as well as intangibles I received working for the co. Ui is part of that, as well as Workman's Comp. You never see it, it's not accessible by you or your family, but it's there nonetheless. Also if you quit, it is easier to find your next job, than if you get fired. Of course you can always lie about it but when they find out, you will get 'let go'. So I am using my 401k I just rolled over into an IRA, it's easier to access that way. It should also been double its value but there's the economy for you. I am also living on the generosity of my brother and sister-in-law, which is wearing thin. Believe me if I could do things differently, I would, but this isn't the perfect world. I guess I could have stayed in MI and tried to keep my job while at the same time looking for a place to live for me and my nephew, but you know what? You do things in life where you think they will be 'right decision' at the time and work for you. Not everything is a sure bet. So much for my rant, my apologies.
Troy

Your mental facilities are poorly staffed. Sorry for your loss.

[AnchorTactical]

I like you kid