CA New Attempt to Functionally Ban Semi-Auto Rifles.

[sigstroker]

I believe brown Vetoed the last time they tried. If Newsom wins, we are fuccked

If they did pass a bill to make the BB illegal, will current rifles be grandfathered? If so, does that mean we can remove the BB on our current rifles?

None. The cities that have enacted ex post facto banning of high-cap magazines have not had their ordinances overturned. The BB banners will expect their law to survive the courts too. There will be no registration, just an outright ban.

[Norcalkid]

If they ban bullet buttons, they'd be creating a whole hell of a lot more RAWs. They should probably be careful what they wish for.

Creating RAW is in effect banning these guns in the future (can't be sold or passed on). So if their playing the long game then yes they do want to create a bunch of RAWs.

[jcwatchdog]

None. The cities that have enacted ex post facto banning of high-cap magazines have not had their ordinances overturned. The BB banners will expect their law to survive the courts too. There will be no registration, just an outright ban.

Because the size of magazines isn't defined in Heller or McDonald. Features aren't either. However if a total assault weapon (as defined by the antis) ban is the goal, why can you still buy assault weapons in CT and NY? Don't you think they would have banned them completely by now, especially in NY? They can't ban the gun completely. So they have to play the game of trying to do a backdoor ban, but they always fail because they know they have limits on what they can do. Here's a NY AK, and actually they don't even need bullet buttons there, so they're not worse or better off than we are: