Mac Series "Handguns?"

[Mudvayne540ld]

That reminds me....

I was in ROP LAW Enforcement my last semester of High School. We were gunna get to see the Range Master shoot the Glock 18 full auto w/50 rnd mag. He never got to it I did ask tons of OLL questions tho...to him and the SWAT guys who came in, and SB23 stuff.

Mac-10 full auto is way inaccurate when he shot it tho.

[JPglee1]

Reminds me of the waterguns I used to play with, called the Waterhawk, by entertech. Kinda sad, since there's only a few who got to play with such a cool water gun...and anyone who wasn't a kid in the 80's probably wouldn't remember it. I had an uzi too, with a collapsible stock and detachable mag for quick reloading by the pool!

I have one of those still, in the blue box it came in. ITs the UZI pistol one w/no stock.

It runs on batteries and has 2 "mags" you fill with water...

No orange tip... couldn't play with those anymore.


Rememebr the freon powered Full Auto BB guns that looked like MAC-10s?



J

[xenophobe]

Since you cant ban a weapon by "series"

Masterpiece Arms has a MAC 9mm Defender SA Pistols. If they sent one of these to a DOJ testing facility and it were approved. Would that mean theres a CA-LEGAL Mac-10 lookalike?

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...?Item=52490287

Part of the reason that SB-15 was created, was to keep firearms like this out of California... A Tec-9 or M-9/11 type pistol would not pass the drop test, guaranteed.

[Turbinator]

Part of the reason that SB-15 was created, was to keep firearms like this out of California... A Tec-9 or M-9/11 type pistol would not pass the drop test, guaranteed.

A Tec 9 style pistol would never even be allowed because it is considered an "assault weapon" with the magwell outside of the pistol grip.

An M11 style pistol without a threaded barrel has no such evil feature concerning magazine location and conceivably COULD be submitted for drop testing, and possibly made to pass. The politics behind it, however, I have no clue. I thought it's just a matter of money - if you could pay enough to get a sample submitted, and it passes, wouldn't CA then list it?

Turby