Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

DRONE

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    onelonehorseman
    Veteran Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 4888

    Originally posted by Doheny
    No doubt OP was mostly venting. We know that as a responsible gun owner he wouldn't shoot a drone, as much as it does sound fun.
    Let's hope. But I think paint balling it wouldn't be out of the question if it got close enough.
    Last edited by onelonehorseman; 10-29-2015, 12:11 PM.
    sigpic

    Comment

    • #17
      Exile Machine
      No longer in Business
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Oct 2009
      • 9551

      Toss up a net and snare it. Easier than you think to bring one down non-destructively. That way you can sell it on eBay. Finders Keepers.

      -Mark
      Manufacturer of CA AWB Compliance Products from Oct 2009 to Nov 2018

      Comment

      • #18
        onelonehorseman
        Veteran Member
        • Oct 2012
        • 4888

        I wonder if trespass laws are applicable to these devices. There is legislation in the works that may eventually require them to have unique id's so the owners can be identified. If so, there may be legal ramifications for those who overfly the private property of others without permission.

        Just wondering.
        Last edited by onelonehorseman; 10-29-2015, 12:21 PM.
        sigpic

        Comment

        • #19
          Mayor McRifle
          Calguns Addict
          • Dec 2013
          • 7747

          Originally posted by Yugo
          this.... and as someone said its just someone enjoying their hobby most likely dont be a douche.
          He's not being a douche. He's being a man who is willing and able to defend his property and his privacy. The douche is the jackass drone operator who thinks that flying over another man's property with a camera is an acceptable "hobby."

          Good job, OP. As a fellow Central Valley property owner, you have my full support.
          Anchors Aweigh

          sigpic

          Comment

          • #20
            -hanko
            CGN/CGSSA Contributor
            CGN Contributor
            • Jul 2002
            • 14174

            Originally posted by Doheny
            No doubt OP was mostly venting. We know that as a responsible gun owner he wouldn't shoot a drone, as much as it does sound fun.


            I'm a very responsible, and I'd drop one in a second. I've got too many pricey horses that freak out and schitt at strange flying objects, but that's the nature of the beast. And that's not even addressing the issue of my privacy on my own acreage.


            Originally posted by Mayor McRifle
            He's not being a douche. He's being a man who is willing and able to defend his property and his privacy. The douche is the jackass drone operator who thinks that flying over another man's property with a camera is an acceptable "hobby."

            Good job, OP. As a fellow Central Valley property owner, you have my full support.
            ^Correct answer. OP, if you can and do dump the drone, please post pics.
            True wealth is time. Time to enjoy life.

            Life's journey is not to arrive safely in a well preserved body, but rather to slide in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "holy schit...what a ride"!!

            Heaven goes by favor. If it went by merit, you would stay out and your dog would go in. Mark Twain

            A man's soul can be judged by the way he treats his dog. Charles Doran

            Comment

            • #21
              Doheny
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Sep 2008
              • 13820

              Originally posted by -hanko


              I'm a very responsible, and I'd drop one in a second. I've got too many pricey horses that freak out and schitt at strange flying objects, but that's the nature of the beast. And that's not even addressing the issue of my privacy on my own acreage.
              Originally posted by Mayor McRifle
              He's not being a douche. He's being a man who is willing and able to defend his property and his privacy. The douche is the jackass drone operator who thinks that flying over another man's property with a camera is an acceptable "hobby."
              Last edited by Doheny; 10-29-2015, 6:36 PM.
              Sent from Free America

              Comment

              • #22
                Capt.Dunsel
                Senior Member
                • May 2011
                • 1199

                Originally posted by dirtfarmer
                im thinking quad , it was moving slow over one of my ranches, and it was dark out. it had lights.
                You do know that the Feds use them , at night , in areas known to grow Weed ?

                Just a thought for you .

                And another , they have quads/multi rotors that can withstand gun fire .

                I fly one and let me tell you , they are damn near impossible to damage to the point of not flying back to its home location ( with footage of the attack).

                Or maybe what you saw were Aliens scouting out a good landing spot , they do fly UFOs
                Bweise says "I have to say the situation was not at all helped by 22 yr old former Airsoft douches who kept touting here, "But possession is not illegal!" "

                Fighting on the internet is like being in the special Olympics , everybody wins but your still retarded.

                Librarian " Calguns is not a 'general discussion board".

                Comment

                • #23
                  Mayor McRifle
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Dec 2013
                  • 7747

                  Originally posted by Capt.Dunsel
                  I fly one and let me tell you , they are damn near impossible to damage to the point of not flying back to its home location ( with footage of the attack).
                  I wouldn't say "impossible" . . . http://www.cnet.com/news/judge-rules...ver-his-house/
                  Anchors Aweigh

                  sigpic

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    edgerly779
                    CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                    CGN Contributor
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 19871

                    DEA is flying them all over your area and humboldt county./

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      Capt.Dunsel
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2011
                      • 1199

                      Originally posted by Mayor McRifle
                      Didn't say Impossible , I said Damn Near , Reading is Fundamental
                      Bweise says "I have to say the situation was not at all helped by 22 yr old former Airsoft douches who kept touting here, "But possession is not illegal!" "

                      Fighting on the internet is like being in the special Olympics , everybody wins but your still retarded.

                      Librarian " Calguns is not a 'general discussion board".

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        strongpoint
                        Veteran Member
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 3115

                        Shooting down a drone might be a violation of federal law. There's some ambiguity in the law regarding whether it applies solely to manned aircraft; it was discussed on Volokh just the other day.
                        .

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          Mayor McRifle
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Dec 2013
                          • 7747

                          Originally posted by Capt.Dunsel
                          Didn't say Impossible , I said Damn Near , Reading is Fundamental
                          I wouldn't even say "damn near," with the right ammunition:

                          Anchors Aweigh

                          sigpic

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            SomeGuy75
                            Senior Member
                            • Jun 2015
                            • 1405

                            How about a blast from a fully charged fire hose

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              keenkeen
                              Calguns Addict
                              • May 2011
                              • 6782

                              Originally posted by onelonehorseman
                              I wonder if trespass laws are applicable to these devices. There is legislation in the works that may eventually require them to have unique id's so the owners can be identified. If so, there may be legal ramifications for those who overfly the private property of others without permission.

                              Just wondering.
                              Oh boy, I hope the Govermnet will fix this for us with some new laws.

                              "But far more numerous was the herd of such, Who think too little and who talk too much." -John Dryden

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                sully007
                                Senior Member
                                • Dec 2010
                                • 1612

                                Originally posted by Exile Machine
                                Toss up a net and snare it. Easier than you think to bring one down non-destructively. That way you can sell it on eBay. Finders Keepers.

                                -Mark

                                [emoji106]🏻

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1