Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oaktree Member Price Increase
Collapse
X
-
LA CCW:
Mailed app: 6/23/2021
Received Call: 4/5/22
Interview: 4/12/22
More documentation for GC requested and sent: 6/23/22
Livescan completed and cleared: 8/3/22 Firearm Livescan Completed: 8/7/22
Proceed to training email: 9/13/22
Training doc received: 9/28/22
Call to pick up: 10/31/22
Pick up permit: 11/4/22 -
Isn't oak tree the company that made that smart gun? If so, **** them.Comment
-
-
Are you hitting on me?Originally posted by MotoYou're a schmuck.Originally posted by Jimi JahI punch paper only because it is illegal to punch people.Originally posted by elpaisa1I think flatulence is a more serious crime. I think it should be a misdemeanor with a 1000 dollar fine or 6 months of jail. It should be a felony if done near an open flame.
Originally posted by Euphoria526I'm so awesome, I think I'll quote myself
Comment
-
These images have left an indelible impression on my sense memory, and one that has been so hard to shake merely for the fact that Oak Tree never gave a genuine explanation or apology, nor lent any first-hand statements to squash the doubt that arose from several contradicting and conflicting statements made by others that nullified their grapevine delivered excuses. I was once a regular at Oak Tree, even for firearm purchases and PPTs. I have not crossed their dusty, dirty, parking lot since this all unfolded - and won't until some form of detailed, honest explanation is given - or until they sell their range to somebody else (and hopefully that won't be Armatix!).

Last edited by The Gleam; 04-30-2015, 9:22 AM.-----------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LibrarianWhat compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)
If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?Comment
-
-----------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LibrarianWhat compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)
If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?Comment
-
-
-
Yup, it's CGN.These images have left an indelible impression on my sense memory, and one that has been so hard to shake merely for the fact that Oak Tree never gave a genuine explanation or apology, nor lent any first-hand statements to squash the doubt that arose from several contradicting and conflicting statements made by others that nullified their grapevine delivered excuses. I was once a regular at Oak Tree, even for firearm purchases and PPTs. I have not crossed their dusty, dirty, parking lot since this all unfolded - and won't until some form of detailed, honest explanation is given - or until they sell their range to somebody else (and hopefully that won't be Armatix!).


No info, no background, no details but who needs those right?sigpic NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA Life Member / SAF Life Member
Calguns.net an incorported entity - President.
The Calguns Shooting Sports Assoc. - Vice President.
The California Rifle & Pistol Assoc. - Director.
DONATE TO NRA-ILA, CGSSA, AND CRPAF NOW!
Opinions posted in this account are my own and unless specifically stated as such are not the approved position of Calguns.net, CGSSA or CRPA.Comment
-
I've followed the story from the very beginning, saw all of the info posted, the background, and details as they unfolded; including several of your own posts on the matter revealing what you were advised. Those threads are still active on CGN and anyone can read them. Most everyone here has done so as well.
However, much of it was relayed by third-parties, and none of that was definitive enough from what I read or saw, which lacked info, lacked background, and lacked details - where Oak Tree's absence on addressing the matter directly to this day, the contradictions that continue to levitate, and nothing definitive on their part to refute the reasonable doubt about their involvement has ever been put forth to entirely squash that doubt or minimize the impact of those photos.
I've kept an open mind about their involvement or lack thereof, and would love to see them be more forthcoming. However, they scuttled sheepishly away from the issue with hopes that it would just go away on its own. If there is new information or a new revelation on their part as of late, I'm all ears. I would actually like that to be so.Last edited by The Gleam; 04-30-2015, 2:43 PM.-----------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LibrarianWhat compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)
If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?Comment
-
Everywhere is a long drive for me. I need to get out to A Place to Shoot, I hear it's pretty good.
I'd never seen this photo before:
So Padilla is so clueless about firearms she's never heard of Rule #3?Originally posted by cockedandglockedGetting called a DOJ shill has become a rite of passage around here. I've certainly been called that more than once - I've even seen Kes get called that. I haven't seen Red-O get called that yet, which is very suspicious to me, and means he's probably a DOJ shill.Comment
-
You guys pay WAY too much for a range membership. My local range is only $50 a year, $200 for 5 years or $500 for lifetime. It's $10 a day to shoot for non members and only $5 a day for members. Membership also get you $5 off your match fees at the hogue range. IDPA match is only $25 instead of $30."Suck on my machine gun" (Ted Nugent)
Originally posted by Fishslayer"9mm is for killing Europeans. For truly dangerous people you need a .45."
Originally posted by fighterpilot562I showed up naked to ur house with cake. But you weren't home. YOur wife maced me. And I was arrested
Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,868,930
Posts: 25,177,214
Members: 357,644
Active Members: 5,419
Welcome to our newest member, Ty160805.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 12350 users online. 127 members and 12223 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment