To beat the mandates you must get a attorney, I did

[SanDiego619]

That is how I feel too. No matter what happens, it is better than injecting some dangerous s--- into my body that might kill me or disable me or screw me up for life. No way I am doing that. No way.

[Rockglocks]

[deerdeerdeer]

That is how I feel too. No matter what happens, it is better than injecting some dangerous s--- into my body that might kill me or disable me or screw me up for life. No way I am doing that. No way.

I'm with you on that, I am upset at myself for not contacting all my relatives, some of them got it, most of them didn't... Thus, I feel like a failire on this topic to a degree...

[SPUTTER]

Thumbs up to you sir, Rockglocks. I've been planning on doing the same when my company finally rolls out their policy.
With all the studies and data coming out about the injections, a person would have to want to die to take these shots. This is a very serious matter, life and death serious.

[The Gleam]

My point was that there are a lot of attorneys that have been long prepared to tackle this issue since the word 'mandate' was uttered, or muttered in Biden's case, as well as awaiting the OSHA regs to tackle them properly. They've been well-verse since the beginning and pouring over the possibilities ever day since early September. They aren't suddenly jumping in.

Some have already been working cases against corporations that took it upon themselves to launch their own idea on what they think the mandates should be, while squashing exemptions unjustly - opening themselves up for discrimination, hostile work environment, threat/intimidation abuse, and wrongful termination claims. Such attorneys have the playbook already bound, and the OSHA regs now just took it to the 2nd quarter.

Your attorney does not sound like one of them.

Such attorneys already know most all of what you say you had to advise your attorney about, and then some. They have long been prepared, and would be telling you the strategic approach and damning details, not the other way around.

Hopefully your attorney has passion to catch up and make up for his lack of awareness this late in the game, rather than feigning exuberance, and is solely out for a fast buck.

---

[MasterrEugene]

tag

[ACfixer]

Rockglocks, good for you. I wish you and your wife the very best.

[sd_shooter]

Nice work OP. You've put your money where your mouth is and that's more than most of us can say.

Seems like if the process really takes more than a year then the 'approved' vax will be available here as well. Hopefully that doesn't affect your case.

[stormvet]

The downfall of the Covid hoax was started by a little law suit against UCLA mandates.

Good job OP and God bless, the more of these the better.

[Cali-Glock]

An EUA for a vaccine can only exist if there are no approved vaccines available.

I assume the approved (Comirnaty?) vaccine is purposefully not available as it would mean none of the other EUA vaccines could be used.

[Wherryj]

Why does the Pfizer vaccine not exist in the us?

The actual vaccine approved won't be available in the US until 2023 at the earliest according to Pfizer. Even if they claim that the current vaccine is "identical" to the approved vaccine, that isn't how FDA approval works. Unless the product IS the same product under the same name, it needs specific approval.

Thus, the approved vaccine does not yet actually exist in the US.

[MJB]

Good luck!

[DaveInOroValley]

All the best OP, I am just so blessed that neither myself or my wife have to deal with any of that. I guess it's the first time I've been glad to be older and retired.

[turinreza]

why is Pfizer producing EUA vaccine using the same formula if it doesn't work against Delta variant?
and giving it to children as well?

[theduracellbigd]

why is Pfizer producing EUA vaccine using the same formula if it doesn't work against Delta variant?
and giving it to children as well?

Because it is part of the attorney conspiracy so people will spend thousands fighting mandates