Immune System Functions Are Dropping Around 5% EACH WEEK in Those Who Were Vaccinated

[TheGood]

I'm calling on this. The first vaccinations started in November a year ago, Frontline workers and elderly got their jabs in Jan-March, and it's been more than 6 months since March already. If these people were the walking dead due to no immune system, they would be dropping like flies NOW, not in December.

[stix213]

I'm calling on this. The first vaccinations started in November a year ago, Frontline workers and elderly got their jabs in Jan-March, and it's been more than 6 months since March already. If these people were the walking dead due to no immune system, they would be dropping like flies NOW, not in December.

Yeah I think they are at minimum jumping to conclusions. They are taking data which has signals pointing towards possible ADE for covid, and extrapolating that out to a general immune system failure. What we really need is data on cold, flu, and other infections in covid vaxxed vs covid unvaxxed. But I don't think that data exists.

The "super cold" thing though, that has me wondering if a compromised immune system from the vax really is the case.

https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=1752086

[SPUTTER]

I don't think you can definitively say it's causing AIDS by this data but it shows that the rates of infections are rising with time for the fully vaccinated vs unvaccinated. It does look like the vaccines are making people more prone to covid infection as time passes. This is nothing new though, it's been discussed as far back as April, well at least the drop in antibodies.
This article has the links to the UK government data.

https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/10/comparison-reports-proves-vaccinated-developing-ade/

This article is about a study specifically of the Pfizer vaccine and shows a rapid decrease in antibodies regardless of age. It's actually worse for the highest risk group. Can someone show me how this is beneficial?

https://m.jpost.com/health-and-wellness/coronavirus/antibody-levels-decrease-after-two-doses-of-pfizer-vaccine-study-681260

[stonefly-2]

The damage from the jab is accepted as fact (at least by some) in
parliament and a subject of their process (which I understand not) now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrDDXW_HRrI

[SPUTTER]

If I took these shots, I'd be closely monitoring my immune system and giving my body healthy food and supplements until the toxins cleared out. The human body is an amazing creation and it's continually at work maintaining it's proper function. This dip in immunity could be temporary and I'd definitely stay away from boosters.

[five.five-six]

well I got my second shot in mid-march. I am in the 18weeks age group of that chart and 26 weeks since vaccine...so by that chart I should be dead of something and instead I feel good, no issues...oops, I know...I am the exception to that chart. But my wife was vaccinated even before me and she still is fine too...Good thing to know that my wife, daughter and myself are the exceptions to that chart since we are all 3 healthy and 6+ months since getting the shot.

I suggest to make the chart and the data even remotely believable, to change the weeks to months, that way a few people will believe it and by the time the months pass, no one will remember they are supposed to be sick.

Dibs on your guns.

[theduracellbigd]

The OP is FUD, the childish picture of a skull with a syringe is all you need to know.

[theLBC]

[TheGood]

I don't think you can definitively say it's causing AIDS by this data but it shows that the rates of infections are rising with time for the fully vaccinated vs unvaccinated. It does look like the vaccines are making people more prone to covid infection as time passes. This is nothing new though, it's been discussed as far back as April, well at least the drop in antibodies.
This article has the links to the UK government data.

https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/10/comparison-reports-proves-vaccinated-developing-ade/

This article is about a study specifically of the Pfizer vaccine and shows a rapid decrease in antibodies regardless of age. It's actually worse for the highest risk group. Can someone show me how this is beneficial?

https://m.jpost.com/health-and-welln...e-study-681260

The only think it's saying is that the antibody levels/response decreases over time from the mRNA vaccine. That's pretty well known that people who were vaccinated with this non-traditional vaccine would lose their immune response over time. In addition the Delta and other variants have differences in the spike protein which will make the current vaccines less effective.


It's not making people 'more prone' to infection, the people who were vaccinated are going back to their baseline of 'unvaccinated' as their antibody response returns to 'normal' not 'elevated'.

[SPUTTER]

The only think it's saying is that the antibody levels/response decreases over time from the mRNA vaccine. That's pretty well known that people who were vaccinated with this non-traditional vaccine would lose their immune response over time. In addition the Delta and other variants have differences in the spike protein which will make the current vaccines less effective.


It's not making people 'more prone' to infection, the people who were vaccinated are going back to their baseline of 'unvaccinated' as their antibody response returns to 'normal' not 'elevated'.

That could be the case, I need to look at that Israeli study a little closer but the falling antibody levels is how they are justifying the need for the booster. The efficacy has dropped like a rock and the UK data that Op posted shows the vaccinated are more prone to infection compared to the unvaccinated.
It's the vaccinated that need the booster, not the unvaccinated.

[turinreza]

[TheGood]

That could be the case, I need to look at that Israeli study a little closer but the falling antibody levels is how they are justifying the need for the booster. The efficacy has dropped like a rock and the UK data that Op posted shows the vaccinated are more prone to infection compared to the unvaccinated.
It's the vaccinated that need the booster, not the unvaccinated.

Keep in mind that a large percentage of the 'unvaccinated' have already been exposed to Covid-19. So those who are not vaxed have a higher overall immunity to Delta than the population of vaxed people who are getting exposure but have protection that's dwindling.


Antibodies gained from having had Covid-19 are much stronger and offer lifetime protection.

[SPUTTER]

Keep in mind that a large percentage of the 'unvaccinated' have already been exposed to Covid-19. So those who are not vaxed have a higher overall immunity to Delta than the population of vaxed people who are getting exposure but have protection that's dwindling.


Antibodies gained from having had Covid-19 are much stronger and offer lifetime protection.

And it's probably safe to say many of the vaccinated have been exposed to covid also, being that we dealt with it for over a year without vaccines. So the vaccinated infection rate should be significantly lower unless of course the vaccines themselves are weakening the immune system.
It's becoming evident that the vaccines are actually putting the user in a disadvantage, requiring constant boosters whereas a naturally immune person needs nothing.

[tundraboomer]

That could be the case, I need to look at that Israeli study a little closer but the falling antibody levels is how they are justifying the need for the booster.

If antibodies didn't drop over time your blood would be as thick as molasses. Your memory cell (T & B) count are the key to long-term immunity.

[Term]

personally I think it's the vitamin D. I was taking high amounts before this all started and never got sick. Later I heard about the zinc, and would take it with an ionophore (quercetin, HCQ, Ivermectin, Green Tea extract, Vitamin C) if I got sick, but it hasn't happened. Vitamin D is the bomb for flu, Covid, just about anything.

My doctor told me to take 10,000 IU per day, later other NP's I told about it were concerned it was too much. I dropped it to 5,000 IU which happens to be what Dr. Zelenko recommends. Anyway I do take that religiously whereas many days I skip the zinc. Vitamin D is supposed to help ward off cancer too.

This is exactly what I do, 5000 iu of D.