-
-
either way, it is disgusting that the FDA would publicly insult people that are using it and suggest that it is only for animals when it has been used to treat serious diseases in hundreds of millions of humans for many years.
in fact, it should be illegal and they should all hang from the gallows. -
This paper in Narure gives an interesting perspective as to why it isn't being recommended yet. The tldr is that the clinical trials aren't complete yet and previous studies confirming its effectiveness lacked scientific rigor so can't he trusted.
Just wait for the studies to be completed. Then we'll know.Comment
-
and yet the clinical trials for the clotshot have not been completed either, and they are still making it mandatory, even though it is increasing the infection rate and killing people. in fact, i heard that they abandoned the control group already, although i don't know if that is true.This paper in Narure gives an interesting perspective as to why it isn't being recommended yet. The tldr is that the clinical trials aren't complete yet and previous studies confirming its effectiveness lacked scientific rigor so can't he trusted.
Just wait for the studies to be completed. Then we'll know.Last edited by theLBC; 08-24-2021, 8:19 AM.Comment
-
So the same folks who are terrified of the jab because it hasn't completed clinical trials...
( https://www.fda.gov/news-events/pres...vid-19-vaccine ) are pushing, yet again, another drug that has not been peer reviewed for efficacy in treating a virus. The mental gymnastics are truly top shelf.
There is nothing wrong with being scared of the jab... but don't kid yourselves that you are following logic or science. You should focus more on getting jacked and tan, and then you won't have to worry about it.Comment
-
-
the clinical trials for the clotshot don't end until 2023.
they claimed it was 98% effective (it is not)
they claimed it would prevent the spread (it does not)
they claimed HCQ was deadly (it is not)
they claimed ivermectin was only for farm animals (it is not).
when are you going to stop believing their bullschiff?
Comment
-
i posted this earlier.
Remember Vioxx? I was prescribed this post surgery once.
So it turns out Vioxx DOUBLES your stroke risk.
795,000 strokes a year in the USA, so if everyone took it (since we're mandating a medical injection for everyone) it would have added 800,000 strokes.
BUT, it took EIGHTEEN MONTHS to discover that continued use doubled risk, and it took up to a YEAR after you STOPPED taking it, for the risk to subside.
The 18month study for the mRNA vaccines are...uhnn.. pending.
The biggest thing to note though is that ivermectin is NOT a cure. It slows replication.
You can't give ivermectin as a hail mary pass, it won't save you (fluvoxamine / dexamethasone are used for treatment).
Its most effective in early treatment. A lot of these studies are trialing IVM in hospitalized patients, but no one is considering folks who contract covid and are told to stay at home until they're blue, and to present to the hospital when requiring ventilation (death care, not healthcare), is not an acceptable alternative.Comment
-
they knew oxy was highly addictive, even as they pushed it as a safer and less addictive alternative.i posted this earlier.
Remember Vioxx? I was prescribed this post surgery once.
So it turns out Vioxx DOUBLES your stroke risk.
795,000 strokes a year in the USA, so if everyone took it (since we're mandating a medical injection for everyone) it would have added 800,000 strokes.
BUT, it took EIGHTEEN MONTHS to discover that continued use doubled risk, and it took up to a YEAR after you STOPPED taking it, for the risk to subside.
The 18month study for the mRNA vaccines are...uhnn.. pending.
The biggest thing to note though is that ivermectin is NOT a cure. It slows replication.
You can't give ivermectin as a hail mary pass, it won't save you (fluvoxamine / dexamethasone are used for treatment).
Its most effective in early treatment. A lot of these studies are trialing IVM in hospitalized patients, but no one is considering folks who contract covid and are told to stay at home until they're blue, and to present to the hospital when requiring ventilation (death care, not healthcare), is not an acceptable alternative.
how many americans have been hooked and overdosed? did anyone go to prison, or were those responsible able to pay a fine and keep most of their wealth?
Opioid-involved overdose deaths rose from 21,088 in 2010 to 47,600 in 2017 and remained steady in 2018 with 46,802 deaths. This was followed by a significant increase in 2019 to 49,860 overdose deaths
Comment
-
the clinical trials for the clotshot don't end until 2023.
they claimed it was 98% effective (it is not)
they claimed it would prevent the spread (it does not)
they claimed HCQ was deadly (it is not)
they claimed ivermectin was only for farm animals (it is not).
when are you going to stop believing their bullschiff?
Who We're 'they'?
Things changed with delta. Do you have reason to think think initial studies were inaccurate?
What did the research show on HCQ? We're still awaiting the results of the ivermectian studies.
I'm not finding the results of the Indian study on ziverdo. Do you have a link.Comment
-
Comment
-
Uh oh, better not take any NSAIDS either as there are life threatening long term consequences to your GI track (not to mention your liver).
Cox-2 drugs were designed to be safer replacements for NSAIDS, including aspirin and naproxen, which can cause deadly gastrointestinal bleeding.
How about an apples to apples comparison? You referencing a daily use medication.
Also, what are the long term consequences of getting the virus natually? Where is the 18 month... or better yet 18 year study there?
HPV can cause cancer... Do we know that wu-flu won't cause cancer later in life? or a stress related flare up disease like chicken-pox/shingles?
I don't think that there is, but again, lets get real here when we talk about unknown unknowns, but more research has been done re: the effects of the jab than the long term effects of the virus.Comment
-
"Conclusion
Ivermectin is an effective treatment for COVID-19.
The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 63 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 1 trillion.
As expected for an effective treatment, early treatment is more successful,
with an estimated reduction of 72% in the effect measured using random effects meta-analysis (RR 0.28 [0.18-0.45]).
37% and 96% lower mortality is observed for early treatment and prophylaxis (RR 0.63 [0.38-1.04] and 0.04 [0.00-0.59]).
Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance.
The consistency of positive results across a wide variety of heterogeneous studies is remarkable,
with 92% of the 63 studies reporting positive effects (27 statistically significant in isolation).Real Californian...Comment
Tweet
There are currently 16785 users online. 83 members and 16702 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.
Comment