I'm expecting once the vaccines get full FDA approval, there will be mandatory vaccinations for a wide variety of places. The most common will be schools.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can we expect Mandatory Vaccines for everyone..?
Collapse
X
-
I've been fortunate, so far, in that regard. I've been asked if I was vaccinated, but the doctor hasn't pushed me, yet. Then again, the doctor and I have come to a bit of an understanding that I will take recommendations under advisement, but I'm the one who decides on the course of treatment.
Unfortunately, this is what I see as the future regarding mandatory vaccination. I'm extremely dubious, as are many true 'experts,' that it can or will be mandated by the Federal Government. However, I do see States and private entities creating their own 'mandates' as they relate to access. Why?
States have argued, from the beginning, that THEY are the level of Government empowered to deal with this. Remember the backlash Trump received for even suggesting Federal intervention from Democrat governors such as Cuomo and even Newsom? Thus, as suggested above, it may come down to a version of what we've already seen; i.e., an hodge-podge of 'standards' across the U.S. In that sense, it might potentially be settled judicially if such a mash-up negatively impacts interstate commerce, travel, etc.
Oh boy. Yet another epoch of: "Should the judiciary be establishing public policy and is it even Constitutionally empowered to do so?"Comment
-
That's not going to go over easy with parents and just imagine when children start getting injured or end up dying? I could see many parents pulling their kids out of school.
Mandatory is going to be the tipping point. These shots already have a bad rap so bending over and taking it isn't going to an option for many.
Approval is meaningless. Should have been halted months ago.Comment
-
Mandatory vaccines in general are going to be a non-starter. Won't happen, and shouldn't happen. If some local government were to attempt to enforce it, it would end up in the Supreme Court with an overturning of that decision. The government can not, and should not, force you to get a vaccine as a normal citizen.-- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0Comment
-
As to the OP question, good f’n luck.MAGA - drain the swamp^D^D^D^D^Dcesspool!
Proud deplorable wacist!
#NotMyStateGovernment!
Just remember BAMN - there is no level too low for them to stoop!
COVID survivor - ain?t gonna get pricked!Comment
-
Mandatory vaccines in general are going to be a non-starter. Won't happen, and shouldn't happen. If some local government were to attempt to enforce it, it would end up in the Supreme Court with an overturning of that decision. The government can not, and should not, force you to get a vaccine as a normal citizen.
Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. The Court's decision articulated the view that individual liberty is not absolute and is subject to the police power of the state.
Zucht v. King, 260 U.S. 174 (1922), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court found that the school district of San Antonio, Texas, could constitutionally exclude unvaccinated students from attending the schools in the district.[1]
This Supreme Court case has been used a justification for public school immunization requirement laws in use today.
Comment
-
What was true 100 years ago may not be true now. From a SCOTUS perspective, how could a government force vaccines your average everyday citizen? What law or constitutional provision would allow that?SCOTUS has already said that states can mandate ( and delegate authority for ) vaccines. It’s been settled law for 100+ years.
Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. The Court's decision articulated the view that individual liberty is not absolute and is subject to the police power of the state.
Zucht v. King, 260 U.S. 174 (1922), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court found that the school district of San Antonio, Texas, could constitutionally exclude unvaccinated students from attending the schools in the district.[1]
This Supreme Court case has been used a justification for public school immunization requirement laws in use today.
I’m not endorsing the decisions, I’m pointing out what SCOTUS has said so far. Unlikely to overturn.
That’s not to say that there aren’t lawsuits in process…
Yesterday, Judge Damon R. Leichty (N.D. Ind.) denied a preliminary injunction against the requirement, in Klaassen v. Trustees of Indiana Univ.:...
OTOH, there may be carve outs. Can states mandate vaccines for people that have already been infected and have roughly equivalent immunity? That would be an interesting case!
— Michael
Remember ... we're not talking about kids or military members. On what grounds could the gov't force the average citizen to get a vaccine?-- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0Comment
-
Comment
-
1920s US Eugenics movement was scary.....
Some positive news. Cases in the UK may have peaked. Need a few weeks to see trend, but obviously the UK is roughly a month ahead of the US in terms of the delta variant.Everyone on Calguns keeps talking about TDS. I never knew we had so many fish keepers!
The TDS on my 10gallon tanks 110ppm
The TDS on my 29 gallon tank is 150ppm (due to substrate)Comment
-
If the FDA fast tracks approval without long term longitudinal studies for this vax then why not the next vax or any vax? Why do they even exist if they aren't doing what they are supposed to be doing?Comment
-
This is a scary and inevitable outcome if the FDA pushes these through in the fastest approval process in history. We will have dozens more mandatory shots.https://www.facebook.com/pages/Union...70812799700206
Originally posted by WherryjI am a physician. I am held to being "the expert" in medicine. I can't fall back on feigned ignorance and the statement that the patient should have known better than I. When an officer "can't be expected to know the entire penal code", but a citizen is held to "ignorance is no excuse", this is equivalent to ME being able to sue my patient for my own malpractice-after all, the patient should have known better, right?Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,862,331
Posts: 25,092,149
Members: 355,415
Active Members: 4,718
Welcome to our newest member, scentedtrunk.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 1735 users online. 40 members and 1695 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 11:39 PM on 02-14-2026.


Comment