Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Rand Paul and Dr. Fauci Get Into GIANT FIGHT In Middle Of Hearing Over Masks

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    Sousuke
    Veteran Member
    • Mar 2012
    • 3811

    Originally posted by SAN compnerd
    Rand Paul and Dr. Fauci Get Into GIANT FIGHT In Middle Of Hearing Over Masks

    https://rumble.com/ves2df-rand-paul-...over-mask.html
    They were sort of talking past one another and both have valid points.

    I know Rand Paul has been criticised for not wearing masks and his reasons are that he has immunity. I generally agree with that, if we don't assume natural infection or the vaccines provide immunity then there really is no step forward in this pandemic.

    To Fauci's point, that Rand Paul didn't accept, its true that there actually HAS been reinfection from the South African variant. I think we need to weigh how serious that risk is from a community policy stand point and make a decision.

    If you were asking me which direction to take, I would say that the previously infected and fully vaccinated should abandon precautions and we study this population to see the effect in the sort term. Regardless of what actions are taken at this point the SA variant and B117 will be dominant in the future.
    Everyone on Calguns keeps talking about TDS. I never knew we had so many fish keepers!

    The TDS on my 10gallon tanks 110ppm
    The TDS on my 29 gallon tank is 150ppm (due to substrate)

    Comment

    • #17
      therealnickb
      King- Lifetime
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Oct 2011
      • 8919

      Originally posted by Sousuke
      They were sort of talking past one another and both have valid points.

      I know Rand Paul has been criticised for not wearing masks and his reasons are that he has immunity. I generally agree with that, if we don't assume natural infection or the vaccines provide immunity then there really is no step forward in this pandemic.

      To Fauci's point, that Rand Paul didn't accept, its true that there actually HAS been reinfection from the South African variant. I think we need to weigh how serious that risk is from a community policy stand point and make a decision.

      If you were asking me which direction to take, I would say that the previously infected and fully vaccinated should abandon precautions and we study this population to see the effect in the sort term. Regardless of what actions are taken at this point the SA variant and B117 will be dominant in the future.

      Comment

      • #18
        Sousuke
        Veteran Member
        • Mar 2012
        • 3811

        Originally posted by therealnickb
        Paul was asking for an actual study. I didn’t hear fauxi offer one. The good dr lab rat just keeps moving the goal posts.

        I asked a year ago. Is this the new strategy? Do we lock down the world every time a new virus appears?

        So far I’ve not seen an answer.
        The variant is relatively new so I don't think there has been enough time for something like a peer reviewed study. A quick search brought this:




        I'm not anti-Fauci, but as to your note about moving goal posts, I agree there is an unreasonable fear that vaccination and natural infection won't blunt the pandemic. I think they will, even it there is no herd immunity and the virus becomes endemic to the population as a whole.
        Last edited by Sousuke; 03-19-2021, 1:33 PM.
        Everyone on Calguns keeps talking about TDS. I never knew we had so many fish keepers!

        The TDS on my 10gallon tanks 110ppm
        The TDS on my 29 gallon tank is 150ppm (due to substrate)

        Comment

        • #19
          Scota4570
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2006
          • 1719

          Obliterating society over a bad flu is ridiculous. Viral variations are normal. It is is not a problem.

          They keep moving the goal post and they will do so indefinitely. IT is called "the new normal".

          They are morally bankrupt, power hungry, egomaniacs. So, they must continue to invent new reasons to scare the sheeple into accepting it. They have to double down and assert iron fisted authority. If they loose control they will be prosecuted.

          I see glimmers of the mainstream media is beginning to turn on this administration. That happened much faster than I though it would.
          Last edited by Scota4570; 03-19-2021, 1:44 PM.

          Comment

          • #20
            Wordupmybrotha
            From anotha motha
            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
            • Oct 2013
            • 6965

            Originally posted by LBDamned
            look around... government has control.
            It's sad

            Comment

            • #21
              Wordupmybrotha
              From anotha motha
              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
              • Oct 2013
              • 6965

              Wearing two masks...pure theatrics by Dr Fauxchi

              Comment

              • #22
                nedro
                Veteran Member
                • Nov 2014
                • 4130

                There was ZERO argument. Neither one attempted to answer the others claims.
                Nothing more than Political grandstanding. And a poor attempt at that!

                Comment

                • #23
                  SanDiego619
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Jan 2013
                  • 11966

                  Wearing one mask is stupid. Wearing two masks is idiotic.
                  Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty.

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    Sousuke
                    Veteran Member
                    • Mar 2012
                    • 3811

                    Originally posted by TFA777
                    https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes...QBRsmI.twitter

                    5,775 variants by JUNE 2020.

                    The paper cited ONE example of reinfection. This is no different to the original 2 strains (S Korea and Italy) which also experienced a very small number of reinfections (China reported some too).

                    There's literally nothing new.
                    I said the variant. I am specifically refering to the variant highlighted by Fauci which is relatively new.
                    Everyone on Calguns keeps talking about TDS. I never knew we had so many fish keepers!

                    The TDS on my 10gallon tanks 110ppm
                    The TDS on my 29 gallon tank is 150ppm (due to substrate)

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      LBDamned
                      I need a LIFE!!
                      • Feb 2011
                      • 19040

                      Originally posted by SanDiego619
                      Wearing one mask is stupid. Wearing two masks is idiotic.
                      ... because everyone knows - you need three to be safe from the invisible killer!
                      "Kamala is a radical leftist lunatic" ~ Donald J. Trump

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        SAN compnerd
                        CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                        CGN Contributor
                        • May 2009
                        • 4725

                        Originally posted by Sousuke
                        The variant is relatively new so I don't think there has been enough time for something like a peer reviewed study. A quick search brought this:




                        I'm not anti-Fauci, but as to your note about moving goal posts, I agree there is an unreasonable fear that vaccination and natural infection won't blunt the pandemic. I think they will, even it there is no herd immunity and the virus becomes endemic to the population as a whole.
                        This study was performed last year and yet it managed to capture data on variants and vaccine effectiveness against them (they are effective).


                        Does it seem strange that a study has been done on the variants and vaxx effectiveness but no real study about masking or other data on the variants other than fear mongering?

                        Problem I have with Fauci and the masks is that his 'studies' on the matter are about particle filtration and not viral spread. That's just one more reason why I hate that guy, he's been dishonest from the beginning and the dishonesty continues.

                        The CHARMS study of Marines makes it pretty clear masks don't work. The DANMASK study makes it pretty clear masks don't work. I recently posted a NIH study here that showed a dozen plus negative health impacts from wearing masks like increasing CO2 level in the blood which triggers the fight-or-flight response and panic. It also documented how small the particles are and how even the N95 mask is like chain link fence against mosquitoes.
                        "I think we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious." - Thomas Jefferson, 1824

                        Originally posted by SAN compnerd
                        When the middle east descends into complete chaos in 2-3 years due in part to the actions of this administration I'll necro post about how clueless I was.

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          Den60
                          CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                          CGN Contributor
                          • Jul 2016
                          • 2695

                          Originally posted by blkoutdb
                          Once you catch something you can never get it again?

                          Well, once a "novel" virus makes its way through a population it becomes less novel. Once infected, your body will remember how to fight it. As you get older, however, other health conditions may inhibit the body from fixing itself.


                          Mojave Lever Crew Member

                          "It is time for us to do what we have been doing and that time is every day. Every day it is time for us to agree that there are things and tools that are available to us to slow this thing down." - Kamala "Heels Up" Harris

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            walmart_ar15
                            Senior Member
                            • Oct 2006
                            • 2262

                            bottom line. No one knows or can predict this virus (and variants) impact to human society. Unlike other virus in the past, this one had help to become infectious to human. It is more efficient in spreading with similar mortality rate as other virus in the past. Because it is not naturally in origin, no one knows how long the body will retain memory to fight it again. Only time will tell.

                            Mask was never intended to protect the wearer. It is to prevent transmission of liquid particles that may have virus within it from spreading from people's mouth and nose.

                            Question to policy makers is if people have hard evidence that mask wearing can reduce the infection rate by x% but does nothing to protect the person wearing it would people still wear a mask or not?

                            Government's policy is never intended to protect the individual, it is more geared to the entire population. If mask will reduce the virus transmission even at 10%, they will require it as it is better than none. So some will lie to have people wear it since they believe in this self serving society, people will have no consideration for others but themselves. Other who has more faith in American morality wants the truth so people can decide for themselves.

                            So which side are you?

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            UA-8071174-1