Most libs aren't smart enough to unpack what this 'doctor' said. See at the time the existing knowledge of flu vaccine effectiveness was about 30% since it's just a guess what strain to vaccinate for each year and they mostly guess wrong.
Then we had several universities do some 'studies' on what masks do the best at filtering particles. Note that there is zero correlation between a masks ability to filter and if they slow the spread of disease, those two things must be studied differently and there was no study that showed mask effectiveness and stopping or slowing the spread, but for Dr. Redfield that didn't matter, he just figured he would bafflem em with BS and made that statement as if there was a correlation between mask filtering ability, which was reported to be about 30% with the typical surgical mask and so he tells the public that this is true and the mask gives you 30% protection like a vaccine.
This is utter, total and complete disinformation with zero science behind it, but that matters not to the useful idiots who can't wait to comply with the next totalitarian edict from on high.
If masks were even minimally effective then the Danemask study of 6000 people seeking to answer the question of if masks reduce community spread would have come up with at least a minimally statistically significant result. it did not and in fact the outcome was orders of magnitude less than the statistically significant threshold.
Redfield, like Fauci, is lying to the public, he's just not admitting it like Fauci does.
Then we had several universities do some 'studies' on what masks do the best at filtering particles. Note that there is zero correlation between a masks ability to filter and if they slow the spread of disease, those two things must be studied differently and there was no study that showed mask effectiveness and stopping or slowing the spread, but for Dr. Redfield that didn't matter, he just figured he would bafflem em with BS and made that statement as if there was a correlation between mask filtering ability, which was reported to be about 30% with the typical surgical mask and so he tells the public that this is true and the mask gives you 30% protection like a vaccine.
This is utter, total and complete disinformation with zero science behind it, but that matters not to the useful idiots who can't wait to comply with the next totalitarian edict from on high.
If masks were even minimally effective then the Danemask study of 6000 people seeking to answer the question of if masks reduce community spread would have come up with at least a minimally statistically significant result. it did not and in fact the outcome was orders of magnitude less than the statistically significant threshold.
Redfield, like Fauci, is lying to the public, he's just not admitting it like Fauci does.

Comment