Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Ruger 10/22 production quality cutback

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jackliu239
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 539

    Ruger 10/22 production quality cutback

    I brought my very first firearm about 8 years ago and that was a Ruger 10/22. It was flawless, performed as exactly it should have, everything was fine, but I was stupid enough to sell trade it for another rifle last year. And I regret ever since.

    Two weeks ago Turner had the Ruger sale, 10/22 for $199 and 10/22 take down for #300. So I pull the tiger and purchase both of them at once (saves on the dros).

    Once I took my home and playing with it, I notice this 10/22 is drastically different from my first one.

    First of all, the wood quality is very bad, when you move your hand over the wood, you can little bumps and lacerations all over the place, as if it was not sanded at all before applied with coat of glue or paint. And when you take the wood and trigger assemble/barrel apart, the inside wood quality is... really bad to the point I almost got sprinters on my finger touching it first time.

    And when I pull back the slide, it was not smooth at all, I can hear loud distinct click. click. click clock noises as I pull it back. The sound decrease a bit after I apply oil, but I can still heard it. I also feel the metal work is not as smooth as well, but this might just be psychological feeling. However everything else I described besides that was not like my original 10/22 at all.

    My first 10/22 was $189, and this one is $199 eight years apart, I guess with the inflation, Ruger must have cut back on quality control to make a profit... It is just a shame, I rather have them increase the price rather than decrease on the quality.
  • #2
    MiddleKingdom
    Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 442

    If those more knowledgeable can chime in please do. Isn't the 10/22 now made with a synthetic receiver? I think I heard that somewhere. Perhaps that makes a difference in the click you hear. My nephew has a newer 10/22 and it shoots great and the stock isn't bad at all. My 10/22 from 1975 is nice, but I'm sure there's improvements.
    "Now why doesn't somebody take out a .45 and BANG... settle it?" - Mr. Lee

    Comment

    • #3
      G-forceJunkie
      Calguns Addict
      • Jul 2010
      • 6327

      yes, the 10/22 has gotten cheaper over the years. The trigger group is now plastic instead of aluminum. Same with the barrel band. The cast receivers do appear to be rougher, or at least less finishing on them. The finish is also some sort of black paint, on the barrel as well. But they still work great.

      Comment

      • #4
        gunnerstuff
        Member
        • May 2009
        • 458

        I have an old 10/22 from the 80's and the trigger sucked compared to my new TD. I did clean it after I got it, as it appeared a bit dirty/grimy. I put in the auto bolt release, so since it was apart, it was easy to clean.
        Need .50 Beowulf and .458 SOCOM Magazines? Get them: HERE

        Ruger 10/22 TD Field Strip Thumb Screw Knobs... Are HERE!

        Buy from Amazon? Use this link to shop and earn money for CGF at the same time!

        Comment

        • #5
          jackliu239
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2010
          • 539

          Yes indeed, the trigger guard is now all Polymer, as well as most of the trigger lower assembly as well. I actually always wanted the 10/22 to be even more lighter, so maybe this is not a move in the bad direction.

          As long as the rifle function well it should be fine, but I guess only time will tell.

          Comment

          • #6
            littlejake
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2008
            • 2168

            The ejector is also plastic!
            Life Member NRA and 2A Foundation.
            My posts are my own opinions and do not reflect those of any organization I am a member of.
            Nothing I post should be construed as legal advice; if you need legal advice, see a lawyer.

            "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
            William Pitt (1759-1806)

            Comment

            • #7
              ojisan
              Agent 86
              CGN Contributor
              • Apr 2008
              • 11762

              No, the ejector is not plastic, it is metal as always.
              The plastic parts in the trigger group are the trigger, main body and the extended mag release.
              All other parts are metal.

              I just got a new production 10/22 as was going to do a thread on my 30 year old one versus the new one.
              I ran out of time, maybe I will try to finish the pics and write it all up.

              Here's the overview:
              - Early receivers had machined rounded rear corners. Late has as-cast. This can make a difference when swapping stocks.
              - New bolts are cut away along the top and have just a small pad that rubs inside the top of the receiver, old bolts were machined full length.
              - New hammers are 100% cast with lightening hollows in them...old were machined from castings. Old hammers use a bushing at the pivot pin on each side, new hammers have the bushings made into the hammer.
              -Old recoil spring guide rods were smooth and polished, new ones can be very coarse and result is rough bolt movement. Polish the new ones smooth or replace if easier.

              Some of these changes were done to cut cost, while others like the hollowed out hammer is an improvement to reduce lock time.

              Originally posted by Citadelgrad87
              I don't really care, I just like to argue.

              Comment

              • #8
                jackliu239
                Senior Member
                • Jul 2010
                • 539

                Great, can't wait for that review.

                Comment

                • #9
                  44fred
                  Senior Member
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 2399

                  The barrel is 100% plastic as well.























                  But seriously, I was talking about this the other day as well. Seems production cutbacks are not Ruger exclusive. Will I ever buy another current production gun? Time will tell.

                  But the customer service is good. :-)
                  "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."

                  "My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government."

                  "No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms"
                  -- Thomas Jefferson

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    bohoki
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 20815

                    the ruger plastic is pretty good

                    the little differences are no big deal the barrels seem to have the same accuracy

                    besides most people upgrade parts anyway those that dont the gun works just fine as is

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      gatesbox
                      Senior Member
                      • Oct 2010
                      • 1860

                      The Ruger 10/22 is what I call the most expensive cheap gun made. Why? Because virtually everyone upgrades almost all the parts. To make your 10/22 purrrrr you will need to: polish the bolt, replace the buffer pin, replace the charging spring (replacing the whole charging rod and handle is always nice), if not replacing the trigger polishing and a metal trigger with adjustable travel stop helps. At this point you have put about another $200 into your rifle add that much again or more for a match grade trigger group.
                      "Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscripti catapultas habebunt."

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        SteveR213
                        Junior Member
                        • Jun 2011
                        • 63

                        I have a target model 10/22 and the quality on it is top notch. Barrel is a bit heavy, but it is a .920. Dead on perfectly accurate.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Cowboy T
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Mar 2010
                          • 5725

                          I'm not opposed to the use of plastic as long as it doesn't degrade the durability of the firearm. The trigger guard is one example. The stock is another. And as for the receiver being "synthetic", I'm not sure what *that* means, but my receiver looks to be aluminum. The barrel is stainless steel, and the furniture is birch (formerly black plastic--works very well, but I just like how wood looks).

                          The rifle is very reliable, even after several bricks of the Wally-World .22LR bulk-pack bricks. It's more precise a shooter than I am.
                          "San Francisco Liberal With A Gun"
                          F***ing with people's heads, one gun show at a time. Hallelujah!
                          http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com (reloading info w/ videos)
                          http://www.liberalsguncorner.com (podcast)
                          http://www.youtube.com/sfliberal (YouTube channel)
                          ----------------------------------------------------
                          To be a true Liberal, you must be 100% pro-Second Amendment. Anything less is inconsistent with liberalism.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            TenSeven
                            Senior Member
                            • Dec 2007
                            • 1269

                            Originally posted by Cowboy T
                            I'm not opposed to the use of plastic as long as it doesn't degrade the durability of the firearm. The trigger guard is one example...
                            A while back when the 10/22 went to a polymer trigger guard there was a video showing the durability difference between the plastic and aluminum guards.

                            When dropped or otherwise impacted, the plastic guard survived while the metal one was broken.

                            Lighter and stronger sounds like a win-win in this case.

                            I have a 10/22 from '96 with a metal guard and another one from ~'09 with the plastic guard. I have no preferences either way, they both work great.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              m1a1driver
                              Senior Member
                              • Feb 2009
                              • 1031

                              I noticed the new "stainless" ones have a horribly cheap, dull gray paint on them, vs the shiney stainless barrels on older ones. Still runs like a champ so i'm happy.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1