Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

High Velocity .22LR safe for older firearms?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MiddleKingdom
    Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 442

    High Velocity .22LR safe for older firearms?

    I have a Remington Model 12 slide action .22 rifle and a Colt Officer Model .22 revolver. According to Colt the revolver was manufactured in 1937. Not sure about the Remington, but I know they stopped making the rifle in 1936. In appearance they are both in great shape, but I've been told that because they were not designed to fire high velocity ammunition I should probably shoot standard velocity. I picked up a brick of standard velocity ammunition made by Winchester. It's cheaper than I've seen anywhere else at $21.95/500. I probably should have bought more. What do you think?
    "Now why doesn't somebody take out a .45 and BANG... settle it?" - Mr. Lee
  • #2
    Ogre8472
    Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 374

    I had a j.c. higgins that did just fine with some loads. The important part is make sure its in good operating condition.
    Rifles:
    Savage 93fvss
    Savage 64fxp
    Savage Mk II FV
    Henry H001
    Pistols:
    FNH P45
    Browing Buckmark
    Shotgun:
    870 20g

    Comment

    • #3
      dangerranger
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2010
      • 578

      My model 12 shoots best with CCI std velocity. By a long shot. At 25yds mine shot Win and Rem into shotgun patterns, But shot the CCIs into an almost touching cluster. My gun has a pitted barrel and should be relined but CCI has kept it going for awhile longer! It still takes rabbits a couple times a year. Mine was first sold to an Armenian couple in 1919. It was there farm gun till I bought it from the old lady in 1978. It had rough treatment till I got it. one day Id like to get an Octagon barreled model 12 to go with it. DR

      Comment

      • #4
        The Right to Bear Arms
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2012
        • 680

        Hello Middle Kingdom,

        This issue came up on the Marlin 795 thread and you're doing the right thing to ask about it. I say use standard velocity.
        " A Republic, if you can keep it ..... " Benjamin Franklin

        Comment

        • #5
          MiddleKingdom
          Member
          • Oct 2011
          • 442

          Originally posted by Ogre8472
          I had a j.c. higgins that did just fine with some loads. The important part is make sure its in good operating condition.
          I will definitely do a more thorough examination of the rifle before shooting it. Good idea.
          Originally posted by dangerranger
          My model 12 shoots best with CCI std velocity. By a long shot. At 25yds mine shot Win and Rem into shotgun patterns, But shot the CCIs into an almost touching cluster. My gun has a pitted barrel and should be relined but CCI has kept it going for awhile longer! It still takes rabbits a couple times a year. Mine was first sold to an Armenian couple in 1919. It was there farm gun till I bought it from the old lady in 1978. It had rough treatment till I got it. one day Id like to get an Octagon barreled model 12 to go with it. DR
          My father-in-law gave it to me. He bought it used at a gun shop back in the 70's. Since he's more of a collector than anything else he just stored it until last year. It has a very long octagonal barrel and a Lyman rear peep sight. With very little wear it is a really nice looking rifle.
          Originally posted by The Right to Bear Arms
          Hello Middle Kingdom,

          This issue came up on the Marlin 795 thread and you're doing the right thing to ask about it. I say use standard velocity.
          Yeah, standard velocity costs more and I know it's worth it. Thanks everyone, I appreciate the advice. I hope these family treasures will be enjoyed for as many generations as possible.
          "Now why doesn't somebody take out a .45 and BANG... settle it?" - Mr. Lee

          Comment

          • #6
            kendog4570
            Calguns Addict
            • Dec 2008
            • 5180

            Another thing to consider is sight regulation. I have an old german .22 marked "Kal .22 Lang fur Buschen" and it shoots std velocity stuff exactly where the elevation marks says it will go, on out to 100 yards and past. Takes a while to get there, but it hits where you point it. The ground squirrels dont know the difference. Not so with HV ammo.
            Last edited by kendog4570; 06-18-2012, 10:01 PM.

            Comment

            • #7
              MiddleKingdom
              Member
              • Oct 2011
              • 442

              Originally posted by kendog4570
              Another thing to consider is sight regulation. I have an old german .22 marked "Kal .22 Lang fur Buschen" and it shoots std velocity stuff exactly where the elevation marks says it will go, on out to 100 yards and past. Takes a while to get there, but it hits where you point it. The ground squirrels dont know the difference. Not so with HV ammo.
              Good to know. I didn't even think of that. I'm hoping the Model 12 will be as accurate as I've heard they can be.
              "Now why doesn't somebody take out a .45 and BANG... settle it?" - Mr. Lee

              Comment

              • #8
                bohoki
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Jan 2006
                • 20826

                your gun should handle anything but stingers the case is long on those and can be difficult to extract

                Comment

                • #9
                  dangerranger
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2010
                  • 578

                  Originally posted by bohoki
                  your gun should handle anything but stingers the case is long on those and can be difficult to extract
                  Actually the model 12 was discontinued when High Velocity ammo first was introduced. it was replaced by the model 120. the only real difference was a little more steel in the frame. I wouldn't shoot anything faster than standard velocity ammo. with all the target and sub sonic ammo out there it shouldn't be hard to find something that works well. I definitely would not shoot stingers or any of the hyper velocity stuff from a gun made before 1936. DR

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    MiddleKingdom
                    Member
                    • Oct 2011
                    • 442

                    Originally posted by dangerranger
                    Actually the model 12 was discontinued when High Velocity ammo first was introduced. it was replaced by the model 120. the only real difference was a little more steel in the frame. I wouldn't shoot anything faster than standard velocity ammo. with all the target and sub sonic ammo out there it shouldn't be hard to find something that works well. I definitely would not shoot stingers or any of the hyper velocity stuff from a gun made before 1936. DR
                    Definitely not Stingers! I do have that brick of Winchesters in standard velocity so I'll try them out. I've been dying to shoot the Model 12 because it's supposed to be a really smooth action.

                    DR, since you have a Model 12 I have to ask you if it's difficult to assemble/disassemble and clean. What are you thoughts?
                    "Now why doesn't somebody take out a .45 and BANG... settle it?" - Mr. Lee

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      dangerranger
                      Senior Member
                      • Jun 2010
                      • 578

                      Mines really easy to strip for cleaning. I loosen the take down screw, separate the front and rear half's, and right in front of the reciver on the action bar there is a button that lets the fore end come back just far enough to let the bolt out. With it stripped into those three pieces its easy to clean with a tooth brush, and clean the bore from the breech. DR

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        The Right to Bear Arms
                        Senior Member
                        • Apr 2012
                        • 680

                        Originally posted by MiddleKingdom
                        I hope these family treasures will be enjoyed for as many generations as possible.
                        Same here. Isn't it funny how the little things take on increasing importance as we get older?.. haha.

                        Here we are in California sweating bullets ( pardon the pun ) over the freedoms and quality of life of our grandchildren.

                        Spoiled Brats aren't even born yet.
                        " A Republic, if you can keep it ..... " Benjamin Franklin

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          JAGGUY
                          Senior Member
                          • Jan 2008
                          • 1547

                          I got a Model 12 a few years ago and asked the question on Rimfire Central. There are some real Remington M 12 experts over there and was advised to stay away from high velocity as it can cause pretty quick wear.

                          Since then I have gotten hooked on 22 shorts in that rifle. I'm amazed how accurate they are and how "powerful" such a small cartridge is. Yes, I did say that!
                          Plus the M 12 cycles them perfectly.
                          1A-2A=-1A

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            kendog4570
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Dec 2008
                            • 5180

                            A steady diet of shorts WILL smear lead in the forward part of the LR chamber. Make sure you get it out regularly, or it can lead to major chamber corrosion and general screwuppage if left there. I have a M12 in my shop right now that is suffering from this. Lead deposits that interfere with LR extraction, and pitting underneath the deposit, producing a pitted chamber and all that goes with it.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              JAGGUY
                              Senior Member
                              • Jan 2008
                              • 1547

                              I understand the lead deposit issue, but the corrosion I don't since I don't shoot corrosive ammo...
                              1A-2A=-1A

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1