Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

17 HMR in AR platform

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jbush
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 407

    17 HMR in AR platform

    I see that Alexander Arms has an AR upper in 17 hmr now, anyone had any experience with this. I know that 17 hmrs in semi auto have had alot of issues, but the AR platform is much more beefy then a 10/22 magnum converted to 17. Any thoughts or anyone had an opportunity to see or try one. They're a little pricey, but it looks like they are using a high quality match barrel and they include trigger parts. I love my 17 bolt gun and a dedicated 17 AR might be different.
  • #2
    CHS
    Moderator Emeritus
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Jan 2008
    • 11338

    All I know is, no bullet button required

    Sign me up!
    Please read the Calguns Wiki
    Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
    --Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment"

    Comment

    • #3
      mark2203
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2008
      • 1136

      Me want!

      Comment

      • #4
        aznwolf118
        Member
        • Dec 2005
        • 494

        very very interesting.....
        me want ..

        Comment

        • #5
          m98
          Veteran Member
          • Jul 2005
          • 4088

          My uncles got one on order. Looks good. Im gonna get one myself too.
          "Screw U guys, I'm going home"...:the great Eric Cartman

          10mm. Because .45ACP just doesn't cut it anymore. <Trailerparktrash>

          Comment

          • #6
            morrcarr67
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Jul 2010
            • 15026

            Originally posted by CHS
            All I know is, no bullet button required

            Sign me up!
            That's what I'm saying.

            I've been waiting for this myself.
            Yes you can have 2 C&R 03 FFL's; 1 in California and 1 in a different state.

            Originally posted by Erion929

            Comment

            • #7
              donw
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2010
              • 1754

              ummmm...i like the .17 HMR.

              in an AR platform? i'm not certain.

              i'm watching California state legislature to move, legislatively, on the .17 HMR in the future as it will penetrate low level body armor from close range.

              i think i might move toward the .204 Ruger in the AR even though a BB is required with it here. the .204 is laser beam flat shooting, accurate to the extreme and has much, much, more oomph for a small bore. (Yes, i know it is a center-fire and it's re-loadable) it's not nearly as limited as the 17 HMR.

              JMO...
              NRA life member, US Army Veteran

              i am a legend in my own mind...

              we are told not to judge muslims by what a few do...yet, the NRA membership and firearms owners are ALL considered as radical...

              "The second amendment ain't about your deer rifle..."

              Comment

              • #8
                sephy
                Senior Member
                • Jul 2007
                • 1146

                I want one.

                Comment

                • #9
                  GrapesOfWrath
                  Junior Member
                  • Feb 2012
                  • 85

                  I thought 17 HMR could not be reliably fed semi auto from magazine? The issue I recall is there is too much leverage on the bullet shank in the neck of the case. There are warnings on boxes of 17s. Has this changed?

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    GrapesOfWrath
                    Junior Member
                    • Feb 2012
                    • 85

                    Guess I'm old news. Read the AA FAQ and it sounds cool.

                    Originally posted by GrapesOfWrath
                    I thought 17 HMR could not be reliably fed semi auto from magazine? The issue I recall is there is too much leverage on the bullet shank in the neck of the case. There are warnings on boxes of 17s. Has this changed?

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      jbush
                      Member
                      • Oct 2010
                      • 407

                      I understood that the problem with 17 in a semi wasn't a mag feed problem as much as a pressure problem. Since most of the 17 semis that were recalled or discontinued were mainly 22 magnums beefed up to handle 17, I think using the AR platform would give them a beefier starting point to begin with. Since the gun was designed from the ground up, working backwards from a centerfire to a rimfire, that they have probably addressed this issue. The only drawback I can see so far is the price, but I'd still like to try one. The beta rifles are out and Im waiting to see some range and field reports, but I think I'm gonna start saving for one. I think I'd like it much more then a 22 AR.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      UA-8071174-1