Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Need input: .22 Colt AR15 for $500

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    LINKS001
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 323

    If you're on a budget on your red dot, go with a "Tasco Red Dot"



    I have one for my .22lr and it shots fine for a CHEAP low ball red dot. (Since you just want a simple red dot). Its has 11 light settings, 5MOA, 1x30mm, weavers/pico style of choice. simple to use and install. It sits low, that is the only con.
    Last edited by LINKS001; 09-13-2011, 6:43 PM.
    SFMF, USMC 1371/2111 CageMaster.

    Comment

    • #17
      LINKS001
      Member
      • Apr 2010
      • 323

      P.S. sorry i chose a crap looking photo from ebay, which i was on.
      SFMF, USMC 1371/2111 CageMaster.

      Comment

      • #18
        dirtracer27x
        Member
        • Mar 2011
        • 435

        as much as people hate on the colt,i love mine.have shot both and they bothe feel good.i went with my just due to the feel/weight of the rifle.it was very accurate outta the box and very reasonably priced,$459 on sale at big 5.the sw1522 shot well also but felt very light and toy like to me due to the composites,but on the flip side if you want a lighter gun sw is the way to go.i bought mine on a impulse buy so it was sight unseen,but i am very pleased with her.1000 rnds and no hiccups.either one and you in the money imo
        oh and all my accesorys are mil spec




        "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
        the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

        Comment

        • #19
          Stanksbeamen
          Member
          • Aug 2011
          • 232

          Originally posted by pbsmind
          I'd vote for build your own, as I am currently in that process right now.
          Yep, just purchased my stripped lower (Stag Arms) today. Have the 10 day wait, have to find a good lower parts kit, a butt stock and sights/red dot.

          Originally posted by LINKS001
          If you're on a budget on your red dot, go with a "Tasco Red Dot"

          I have one for my .22lr and it shots fine for a CHEAP low ball red dot. (Since you just want a simple red dot). Its has 11 light settings, 5MOA, 1x30mm, weavers/pico style of choice. simple to use and install. It sits low, that is the only con.
          Thanks for the info, the other day I probably looked at about 15+ red dot sights. I found one that uses a AA battery but now forget which one it was. I'll have to revisit that one day but for now folding sights will do the trick. Red dot is just an add on, not needed right away.

          Originally posted by dirtracer27x
          as much as people hate on the colt,i love mine.have shot both and they bothe feel good.i went with my just due to the feel/weight of the rifle.it was very accurate outta the box and very reasonably priced,$459 on sale at big 5.the sw1522 shot well also but felt very light and toy like to me due to the composites,but on the flip side if you want a lighter gun sw is the way to go.i bought mine on a impulse buy so it was sight unseen,but i am very pleased with her.1000 rnds and no hiccups.either one and you in the money imo
          oh and all my accesorys are mil spec
          Thanks, I posted this thread while i was at a gun show so I almost purchased the gun with not knowing much about it. I decided to wait and do a little more research and am happy with my decision to build. I wanted to know a little more about it so building it will help me know all the parts/functions.

          Comment

          • #20
            jkonquer
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2011
            • 623

            Originally posted by davek8s
            Get the S&W or Sig. I have the 15/22, my friend has a 522 and his brother has a Colt. I like that a 15/22 uses real ar-15 parts. All 3 guns shoot fine and with about equal accuracy, but the Colt like a toy to me.
            To answer your question, it shoots just fine.
            what? where do you come with this conclusion?

            Colt is probably the closest copy of the real ar15, its weight, parts, and material it uses. only thing different from real ar15 is the safety switch. other than that colt is as real as it gets. all parts are mil-spec and interchangeable with ar15 parts.

            SW is very good gun as well. however it is made out of polymer material. so its weight and realism isn't as good as colt. That doesn't mean it doesn't shoot well. it is probably the most accurate ar15 copy there is.

            Sig isn't a ar15, but the material and quality is top notch. and as well as accuracy.

            I've shot all three guns, but in the end, I wanted something that is closest to the real ar15 and COLT was it. As far as accuracy, you won't tell the difference between all these guns.

            and i really don't understand all the hate on Colt. 2000 rds on mine with any problem at all. and cleaning is a breeze that even my girlfiend did it right the first time without me tell her anything. SW is little cheaper around $100 less. but i bought my colt ops version for 500 after tax and dros.
            Last edited by jkonquer; 09-16-2011, 6:52 PM.

            Comment

            • #21
              gtoxonizukax
              Junior Member
              • Jun 2011
              • 6

              Originally posted by dirtracer27x
              as much as people hate on the colt,i love mine.have shot both and they bothe feel good.i went with my just due to the feel/weight of the rifle.it was very accurate outta the box and very reasonably priced,$459 on sale at big 5.the sw1522 shot well also but felt very light and toy like to me due to the composites,but on the flip side if you want a lighter gun sw is the way to go.i bought mine on a impulse buy so it was sight unseen,but i am very pleased with her.1000 rnds and no hiccups.either one and you in the money imo
              oh and all my accesorys are mil spec




              where did you get that 20 round mag?

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1