Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

17HMR rifle choice

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • crowbar1
    CGN/CGSSA Contributor
    • Aug 2009
    • 135

    17HMR rifle choice

    Hey guys, I need your help!

    I am looking for a 17hmr rifle.

    I am building my house on a large (I mean LARGE) piece of property, that has lots (I mean LOTS) of squirrels.

    My 10/22 is doing a great job, but there are many shots that I could be taking if it had more range. Say out to 200+ yards. (Will a HMR go out that far?)

    Budget is up to $1000 for the rifle. Must have quality, as it will be used 2-5 times a week (Nice to walk out your back door and shoot)

    While your at, feel free to throw out some options for optics as well (up to $500)

    Thanks in advance!!!
    Originally posted by wrightb
    The gun will make a weird sound, like a loose fart escaping. There usually won't be the bang you are accustomed too.
  • #2
    JBird33
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2008
    • 559

    I absolutely love my Savage 93R17 BTV. You could easily spend under $1K for the rifle and scope all said and done.

    HMR will go out to 200+ yards, but it might take a little practice; not to mention that wind really starts to mess with the .17 after a hundred yards or so. If you are going to routinely shoot past 200 yards and have $1500 total to spend, I think I would go for a centerfire cartridge.

    Comment

    • #3
      emc002
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2007
      • 2331

      If it's not too windy, it'll do 200 yards reliably.

      I have a Ruger 77/17 and it replaced my CZ 453 Varmit.
      As for optics, a reliable cheapy that sits on most of my rimfires is a Mueller APV.

      I did build a 10/22 Magnum into a 17HMR, but had nothing but issues with it. I don't recommend it.
      My 10/22 that I converted to a 17 HM2 however is a #$&*!($& tackdriver (out to 100 yards, again with no wind)
      "Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views." - William F. Buckley, Jr.

      "I point out the obvious because if I belabor the subtle it only leaves people slack-jawed and drooling." - Bill Heavey

      Comment

      • #4
        JBird33
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2008
        • 559

        Originally posted by emc002
        If it's not too windy, it'll do 200 yards reliably.

        I have a Ruger 77/17 and it replaced my CZ 453 Varmit.
        As for optics, a reliable cheapy that sits on most of my rimfires is a Mueller APV.

        I did build a 10/22 Magnum into a 17HMR, but had nothing but issues with it. I don't recommend it.
        My 10/22 that I converted to a 17 HM2 however is a #$&*!($& tackdriver (out to 100 yards, again with no wind)
        I also run the Mueller APV on my rifle. Great budget scope, especially for hunting purposes. Sometimes when I am killing paper I wish I had a little more magnification, but when all I need is minute of squirrel...boy is it ever deadly.

        Comment

        • #5
          emc002
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2007
          • 2331

          Don't know this guy and he is a newer member, but this is a nice rifle too.
          "Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views." - William F. Buckley, Jr.

          "I point out the obvious because if I belabor the subtle it only leaves people slack-jawed and drooling." - Bill Heavey

          Comment

          • #6
            crowbar1
            CGN/CGSSA Contributor
            • Aug 2009
            • 135

            Originally posted by emc002
            If it's not too windy, it'll do 200 yards reliably.

            I have a Ruger 77/17 and it replaced my CZ 453 Varmit.
            As for optics, a reliable cheapy that sits on most of my rimfires is a Mueller APV.

            I did build a 10/22 Magnum into a 17HMR, but had nothing but issues with it. I don't recommend it.
            My 10/22 that I converted to a 17 HM2 however is a #$&*!($& tackdriver (out to 100 yards, again with no wind)
            Do you like the Ruger more then the CZ? Is it better in fit and finish?
            Originally posted by wrightb
            The gun will make a weird sound, like a loose fart escaping. There usually won't be the bang you are accustomed too.

            Comment

            • #7
              emc002
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2007
              • 2331

              Originally posted by crowbar1
              Do you like the Ruger more then the CZ? Is it better in fit and finish?
              Yes I like it more, I find I'm more accurate with it. The rifle simply fits me better.
              The CZ had a better trigger out of the box, but after my gunsmith was done, the Ruger's is better. Fit and finish? About the same, maybe a slight edge to the CZ.
              It's been a while, but I recall them being about the same price.
              "Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views." - William F. Buckley, Jr.

              "I point out the obvious because if I belabor the subtle it only leaves people slack-jawed and drooling." - Bill Heavey

              Comment

              • #8
                crowbar1
                CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                • Aug 2009
                • 135

                Originally posted by JBird33
                I absolutely love my Savage 93R17 BTV. You could easily spend under $1K for the rifle and scope all said and done.

                HMR will go out to 200+ yards, but it might take a little practice; not to mention that wind really starts to mess with the .17 after a hundred yards or so. If you are going to routinely shoot past 200 yards and have $1500 total to spend, I think I would go for a centerfire cartridge.
                I have over 2000 yards to play with, so I know that I will be going to centerfire at some point, but I wanted to sort of work my way up to it. After the HMR, I will be putting a tack driving upper on one of my AR's.
                Originally posted by wrightb
                The gun will make a weird sound, like a loose fart escaping. There usually won't be the bang you are accustomed too.

                Comment

                • #9
                  kevinj0101
                  Junior Member
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 95

                  I have a 452 model in .17 HMR, nice rifle, love the set trigger if you have a good rest. Most people that see it are quite impressed. With a clean bore and no wind that thing will shoot 3 shot groups at 100 yards that you could cover with a dime. At 50 your shooting through the same hole.

                  I don't think you could go wrong with any .17 in my opinion, I have a friend back home that uses a cheap savage .17 to drop coyotes well past 100 yards.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    dg29
                    Senior Member
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 1134

                    Here's the one that I have. It's a stainless black boat paddle stocked ruger 77/22 that I converted to a 77/17 hmr. I also have a 22mag barrel for it, so it can shoot a 22lr, 22mag., and the 17hmr by a swith of the barrel. The bolt and receiver and stock, I put a factory walnut stock on it when I converted it, have the weight and feel of a full size centerfire rifle. The glass on top of it is a 6x20 Nikon Monarch with a very fine reticle. I also have a converted 10/17m2. No matter what you decide to get, the 17m2, or a 17hmr is going to be a very accurate round and a pretty flat shooter. If you get a nice piece of glass you'll enjoy the red mist when eliminating your pest problem. If you plan to customize it by purchasing an aftermarket barrel the Ruger 77 would be the way to
                    go.
                    Just my .02

                    This place may have some useful info. for you: http://www.rimfirecentral.com/forums...splay.php?f=15
                    Last edited by dg29; 10-03-2010, 8:13 AM. Reason: add a link

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      trob
                      Senior Member
                      • Apr 2009
                      • 1881

                      if you already have a 22lr then why dont you get a .223 for the longer shots? a .17 will move a TON with any kind of wind, and to me, a 223 would be more fun/reliable in more conditions.

                      oh, and my 17hmr of choice is CZ 452 or 453
                      Last edited by trob; 10-03-2010, 1:11 PM.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Paindoc
                        Junior Member
                        • Apr 2009
                        • 69

                        Another to look at is the Sako Quad. 22lr,22Mag, 17Mach2, and 17HMR all in one rifle with barrel swap taking less than a minute. Optics stay on barrel and POI is very precise when changing barrels. Best trigger I've ever seen in an inexpensive rifle. I have the light profile barrel version, but there is also a bull barrel version. Mine is consistently 1/2-3/4 MOA.

                        Try the heavier 20gr loads at longer range. Bucks wind with more success.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          bridgeport
                          Senior Member
                          • Jan 2006
                          • 782

                          Another vote for the CZ 452.... It is no joke, you can cover the groups at 100 yds with a dime. Lead free ammo is now widely available for the 17, and unlike the .22 wmr or the tin .22 lr, the .17 lead free is very accurate.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            IDPA4U
                            Member
                            • Jan 2008
                            • 334

                            My CZ 453 Varmint is the most accurate rifle I have ever owned out to 200 yards(if winds are read properly). Fit and finish is excellent, trigger is outstanding, and you can even get a Boyd's tacticool stock if you want to give it a tactical feel. Get a decent scope with plenty of magnification, the better you can see the more accurate you can shoot. Personally I would get one with a Horris reticle so you could hold off for wind with a high degree of accuracy. With all that practice time in your back yard you will probably be able to make first round hits out to 200 yards in no time. Just my 2 cents. Congrats on the new property...some day, some day.
                            Never Mistake Motion For Action"

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              fast318
                              Senior Member
                              • Feb 2007
                              • 761

                              I have a Marlin 917VS with a Weaver scope and it is a tack driver, due to ammo cost this is what I am going to use for the Tactical Turkey Shoot vs. my Savage 10FP. My rifle looks just like the one in the link below. My buddy has the Savage, the Marlin's magazine holds two more rounds (7 total) and the barrel is longer (+2" I believe).

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1