Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Marlin 795 thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Right to Bear Arms
    replied
    Originally posted by DasBoost
    Overall, I like it more than the stock sight as it is a little slimmer and allows for windage adjustment via a smaller dovetail piece instead of the main dovetail. For $10 great upgrade!
    Now there's a Man who builds on the value equation of the Marlin 795! This rifle is a step away from being a Hall of Famer.

    DasBoost, you shooting tomorrow?

    Leave a comment:


  • DasBoost
    replied
    Git my new sight in from Numrich and my ammo from PSA; pics to come. Very easy to install; the screw in the front dovetail is only there for pressure once the sight is in the dovetail. Overall, I like it more than the stock sight as it is a little slimmer and allows for windage adjustment via a smaller dovetail piece instead of the main dovetail. For $10 great upgrade!

    Leave a comment:


  • roushstage2
    replied
    Yeah, I generally just use the 795 magazines so I have an even 10 rounds instead of 7. Makes it easier to shoot 5-shot groups
    Pretty fancy H/C mag though! Didn't know such a beast existed!

    Leave a comment:


  • Chaos47
    replied
    Originally posted by roushstage2
    Didn't know that's what the difference was. My XT-22 apparently came with a pre-88 magazine because it will not fit into the 795 since it doesn't have that cutout.
    Really? That's odd that the XT-22 comes with magazines without the cut out.

    Back in the day Marlin made a little known edition of the 70 (earlier model of the 795) called the HC (High Capacity) it came with 7 and 15 round "banana clip" and there was a 25 round "banana clip" available.



    From what I have gathered when Bill Ruger started rocking the boat, they saw the bans on the horizon they out of fear modified the magazine and the mag well to make these 70HC magazines not compatible with future rifles.


    I have an old Marlin model 70HC and don't remember seeing anything on the site about this rifle that was bought in 1990 at the local Coast To Coast hardware store. Anyone have this model also?


    The magazines are backwards compatible btw, so if you have a 70 you can use 795 magazines in it. Just not the other way around. (unless you file down the nub in the magazine well).

    Or in this case your 795 magazine will work in your XT-22 just not the other way around.

    There are 7 round magazines out there that do have the cutout in them, just as there are 10 round ones without the cutout
    Last edited by Chaos47; 07-02-2012, 1:52 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • roushstage2
    replied
    Originally posted by Chaos47
    Yes I think those are the correct magazines.

    The POST88 Part means that it has the cut in the side of the magazine that corresponding to the nub that sticks out in the magazine well. These features where added to make older highcap magazines not compatible with newer rifles.

    I have ordered many magazines from CDNN, they are good to go, quick, accurate, well packed orders each time.
    Didn't know that's what the difference was. My XT-22 apparently came with a pre-88 magazine because it will not fit into the 795 since it doesn't have that cutout.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chaos47
    replied
    Yes I think those are the correct magazines.

    The POST88 Part means that it has the cut in the side of the magazine that corresponding to the nub that sticks out in the magazine well. These features where added to make older highcap magazines not compatible with newer rifles.

    I have ordered many magazines from CDNN, they are good to go, quick, accurate, well packed orders each time.

    Leave a comment:


  • readysetgo
    replied
    Originally posted by Chaos47
    Not a 100% sure but I think that mag loader is designed to hook around a button on the side of the mag to lower the follower on like Ruger MK / 22/45's. Marlin mags dont have that button so it wont work on them
    I see what you mean. Now that you said that and I look at the pic it makes sense. I couldn't tell how it worked just looking at the pic.

    What about those mags? Are those the correct mags for the 795?
    Listed as: Marlin Bolt POST 88 Auto 22lr 10rd Nickel Plated Mag New Factory, Item# MAR07135

    Leave a comment:


  • Chaos47
    replied
    Not a 100% sure but I think that mag loader is designed to hook around a button on the side of the mag to lower the follower on like Ruger MK / 22/45's. Marlin mags dont have that button so it wont work on them

    Leave a comment:


  • readysetgo
    replied
    Mags on sale @ CDNN for $13.99. Shipping, I think, was a flate $9.99.

    See original post:


    Link:


    Interesting/cheap mag loader here:


    No experience with that, just saw it and thought I'd mention it. For $2, somebody should get it and write up a review.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Right to Bear Arms
    replied
    Originally posted by odslim
    Finally got to shoot my 795 today for the first time...all I got to say is that this is the best $159 Iv spent in a long time,
    The Value side of the equation definitely tilts in favor of the 795 owner v. the competition.

    But the main thing is you enjoyed your new Rifle.

    RBA

    Leave a comment:


  • cdeviney
    replied
    More mags available

    I've received more notifications of product availability:



    Leave a comment:


  • Chaos47
    replied
    Congrats odslim!
    Fine shooting on the small dots top and bottom!

    The mags are a bit of a pain to load but they do seem to get easier the more you use them, I love my AK maglula. And have been thinking of getting a pistol one and a baby one. But that is a lot of money that could be spent on ammo...

    Leave a comment:


  • odslim
    replied
    Finally got to shoot my 795 today for the first time...all I got to say is that this is the best $159 Iv spent in a long time, minus the $39 BSA sweet scope, UTG bipod and scope mount, so well worth every single penny. Only down fall were my finger loading the small bullets, got me thinking twice about the baby uplula I should of got.

    Anyways heres a pic of me sighting at 25 and 50 yard, put about less than 200rd in about 2 hours. I was kinda straped on time.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Right to Bear Arms
    replied
    Originally posted by Gurney

    Now we have to find out how well-made they are, and whether they feed correctly.
    So who's gonna be the first to try one of these new mags out?..

    Leave a comment:


  • Gurney
    replied
    That should have been, "I am receiving notices from sites . . . "

    Old age is not for sissies.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
UA-8071174-1