California rimfire laws

[Quiet]

Are Calico M100 with a folding stock still legal?

In order to be CA legal, the barrel length needs to be 16" or greater and the overall length needs to be 26" over greater (measured with the stock folded/collapsed).

The Calico M100 with factory folding stock has an overall length of 29.8" with stock folded, which means that it CA legal.

However...
01-01-2000 = illegal to make, import, and transfer the Calico .22LR 100 round magazine
07-01-2017 = illegal to possess the Calico .22LR 100 round magazine

[alpha_romeo_XV]

^^^^This. I have a Glenfield that takes 18 in the tube and a Model 60 that takes 14. Good to go.

My Marlin 39A lever gun with 24" barrel holds 19+1 if LR and a whopping 24+1 if Shorts. So there

[Low-Pressure]

That's a bummer! It was my first firearm. Had it since 1988. I was hoping rimfire was not going to be affected by the magazine 10 round limit. I guess it's time to go fishing.

In order to be CA legal, the barrel length needs to be 16" or greater and the overall length needs to be 26" over greater (measured with the stock folded/collapsed).

The Calico M100 with factory folding stock has an overall length of 29.8" with stock folded, which means that it CA legal.

However...
01-01-2000 = illegal to make, import, and transfer the Calico .22LR 100 round magazine
07-01-2017 = illegal to possess the Calico .22LR 100 round magazine

[Dvrjon]

In order to be CA legal, the barrel length needs to be 16" or greater and the overall length needs to be 26" over greater (measured with the stock folded/collapsed).

The Calico M100 with factory folding stock has an overall length of 29.8" with stock folded, which means that it CA legal.

However...
01-01-2000 = illegal to make, import, and transfer the Calico .22LR 100 round magazine
07-01-2017 = illegal to possess the Calico .22LR 100 round magazine

I'm pretty sure the Calico mag doesn't work in any other gun, nor does any other mag work in the Calico. Wouldn't the exemption fit this case?

32406. Subdivisions (b) and (c) of Section 32310 do not apply to the following:
(f) A person lawfully in possession of a firearm that the person obtained prior to January 1, 2000, if no magazine that holds 10 or fewer rounds of ammunition is compatible with that firearm and the person possesses the large-capacity magazine solely for use with that firearm.

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/f...01520160SB1446

[bbodybill]

Rimfire...

Aloha (whatever)....PLEASE be advised that Hawaii just might take the FOREfront of... The ELIMINATION of OUR 2A rights (.22 included)... PLEASE do YOUR part... As WE (Ca.)... Do ours... PERIOD !!!!!!!!

[Penn25]

Aloha (whatever)....PLEASE be advised that Hawaii just might take the FOREfront of... The ELIMINATION of OUR 2A rights (.22 included)... PLEASE do YOUR part... As WE (Ca.)... Do ours... PERIOD !!!!!!!!

Well aware unfortunately. Our governor has signed into law that all gun owners have to register in the FBI rap back list. To add insult to injury we have to pay for said registration. He is of course a great friend of the illustrious lame duck. The governor here has with a swipe of a pen vilified all gun owners here and military being stationed here that are bringing their guns with them. Of course did it in time so he can say to vacationing obama "look what I did boss. Did I do good?".

Aloha

[darwinian2]

What about large-capacity banana magazines for the Ruger 10/22, such as the Butler Creek 25/22? Will they be legal to possess under the new law?

[Penn25]

What about large-capacity banana magazines for the Ruger 10/22, such as the Butler Creek 25/22? Will they be legal to possess under the new law?

The law addresses the registering on the rap back FBIs list. I believe 10 round law already exists.

Aloha

[Quiet]

What about large-capacity banana magazines for the Ruger 10/22, such as the Butler Creek 25/22? Will they be legal to possess under the new law?

No for CA.

Possession becomes illegal on 07-01-2017.

[Jimi Jah]

My .22's will be the only rifles left without weird @ss featureless crap stuck on them.

In other words, they are my most evil looking guns now.

[Blade Gunner]

Since rimfire are exempt from AW classification, a 22WSM in an AR configuration would make an interest alternative.

[Penn25]

Since rimfire are exempt from AW classification, a 22WSM in an AR configuration would make an interest alternative.

There are some companies producing great aluminum stocks for 1022s. They when completed mimic ars. Old Fort is the best and they will engrave to your specs.

Aloha

[Dvrjon]

There are some companies producing great aluminum stocks for 1022s. They when completed mimic ars. Old Fort is the best and they will engrave to your specs.

Aloha

$500 for a stock on a $200 rifle?


No.

[Penn25]

$500 for a stock on a $200 rifle?

I own 3 Old Forts and haven't paid $500 for any. Of course you can buy from others that make aluminum stocks and pay more and get something that doesn't quite look like an ar. Old Fort has a website as well as selling on eBay. I bought a couple of alum stocks whose name I won't mention that nice did not resemble an ar when the build was complete.

Of all my builds I built from receiver up not from Ruger rifle up. Never compared the difference but enoyed the way I did it. You can buy receivers one at a time on GunBrokers for about $65.00 + shipping or $55.00 each in 5-6 bundles. To each his own though. I still haven't completely finished them all. Once down they will be a legacy for my family who all shoot.

Aloha

[Dvrjon]

Not to argue the point, but Ruger receivers need barrels and trigger groups, so $65 is not your gun cost.

Old Fort:
$205: Basic "stock" (no forend or shoulder piece): http://oldfortarms.com/product/arrow...g-stock-black/

$525: Full stock: http://oldfortarms.com/product/arrow...er-stock-1022/

Glad it's working out for you.