Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Super Sniper Scope?
Collapse
X
-
Ah, in your newer pic above, it looks more like what I'd call scuffs. Not too big a deal; easy to touch up, or buff out or something.
Says "10x 42" on the bottom, so at least you know the magnification (10x). 42mm dia objective. "SS" for Super Sniper of course. I have a newer version of nearly the same scope, a SS 10x with the focus on the main tube like that. Different reticle though. It's a very nice scope IMO.Comment
-
For what its worth, mine sits on a registered Hk SR9T in TC configuration. Is a tank and the adjustments are repeatable. There used to be info about swapping out the stock rubber o rings in the turrets for thinner ones for better click feel, but i never did it.
My rifle has a proprietary base and i needed something with enough internal elevation to get me to 1000. This does that easily.
The only beef i have ever seen was with the side paralax models, the rings could sometimes cause binding in the adjustment.
I needed a solid 30mm mildot, which was the apparent standard at the time.
Its a good optic. I have no complaints.
Originally posted by tony270It's easy to be a keyboard warrior, you would melt like wax in front of me, you wouldn't be able to move your lips.Originally posted by repubconservPrint it out and frame it for all I careOriginally posted by el chivoI don't need to think at all..XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXOriginally posted by pjsigYou are talking to someone who already won this lame conversation, not a brick a wall. Too bad you don't realize it.
sigpicComment
-
That is a nice set up, CG87. Glad to hear the SS scopes are good.For what its worth, mine sits on a registered Hk SR9T in TC configuration. Is a tank and the adjustments are repeatable. There used to be info about swapping out the stock rubber o rings in the turrets for thinner ones for better click feel, but i never did it.
My rifle has a proprietary base and i needed something with enough internal elevation to get me to 1000. This does that easily.
The only beef i have ever seen was with the side paralax models, the rings could sometimes cause binding in the adjustment.
I needed a solid 30mm mildot, which was the apparent standard at the time.
Its a good optic. I have no complaints....a fool and his money were lucky to get together in the first place...Comment
-
Nice rifle for sure.
Someone on ebay sells a zero-stop kit for these SS 10x scopes as well. For not too much money. Just FYI. Also, I found a Vortex Switch View throw lever that fits perfectly on my focus ring. Yes, they are expensive. I think more $$ now than just a couple of years ago for some reason. But it's really nice to be able to fine-tune the focus while looking through the scope. For me it felt awkward trying to turn that focus nob while maintaining a cheek weld. I just couldn't get a good grip on the focus ring with my fingers while in that position.
And yes, gobs of elevation adjustment. Mine's on a 20" 6.5 Grendel build (AR) these days. Just a standard Larue mount. I had no problem dialing this SS scope to hit a target out at 1000 yards. With room to spare.
FWIW, mine has the "MOA-Quad" reticle, not the mil-dot. I love its tiny 0.2 MOA dot in center for precision shooting. Nothing at all wrong with a mil-dot though. It's pretty much the standard.
For what its worth, mine sits on a registered Hk SR9T in TC configuration. Is a tank and the adjustments are repeatable. There used to be info about swapping out the stock rubber o rings in the turrets for thinner ones for better click feel, but i never did it.
My rifle has a proprietary base and i needed something with enough internal elevation to get me to 1000. This does that easily.
I needed a solid 30mm mildot, which was the apparent standard at the time.
Its a good optic. I have no complaints.Comment
-
Thanks, Ki6. I like the look of that Zero stop. I'll look into it.Nice rifle for sure.
Someone on ebay sells a zero-stop kit for these SS 10x scopes as well. For not too much money. Just FYI. Also, I found a Vortex Switch View throw lever that fits perfectly on my focus ring. Yes, they are expensive. I think more $$ now than just a couple of years ago for some reason. But it's really nice to be able to fine-tune the focus while looking through the scope. For me it felt awkward trying to turn that focus nob while maintaining a cheek weld. I just couldn't get a good grip on the focus ring with my fingers while in that position.
And yes, gobs of elevation adjustment. Mine's on a 20" 6.5 Grendel build (AR) these days. Just a standard Larue mount. I had no problem dialing this SS scope to hit a target out at 1000 yards. With room to spare.
FWIW, mine has the "MOA-Quad" reticle, not the mil-dot. I love its tiny 0.2 MOA dot in center for precision shooting. Nothing at all wrong with a mil-dot though. It's pretty much the standard.
I did find a Vortex throw lever on line, for $59...is that the one?
...a fool and his money were lucky to get together in the first place...Comment
-
It's this one, the SV-5: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...e?ie=UTF8&th=1Thanks, Ki6. I like the look of that Zero stop. I'll look into it.
I did find a Vortex throw lever on line, for $59...is that the one?
https://www.amazon.com/Vortex-Optics...7040619&sr=8-3
$5 more for some reason. Fits a dia of 1.81" Measure yours just to be sure, but this one fits around my focus ring perfectly.Comment
-
I like the idea of the throw lever, but the price is sobering.
What do you think of this one? It is polymer.
...a fool and his money were lucky to get together in the first place...Comment
-
These scopes are pretty much beloved by the folks over at Snipers Hide. Highly recommended over there when I was looking for a good scope and did not want to break the bank.Comment
-
You might want to mount it on a rifle first and then see if you have an issue adjusting the focus while looking through the scope. Maybe yours will turn easy enough that a cat tail/lever won't be a necessity. Mine is a little on the stiff side. If the ring was just for magnification, a lever is much less important, IMO. On a long-range scope anyway. (Who cars if its at 12x or 12.3x really?) But for focusing, you really want to be able to fine-tune the adjustment. Depending on the distance, there can be a fine line between razor sharp image and "a little fuzzy".I like the idea of the throw lever, but the price is sobering.
What do you think of this one? It is polymer.
https://www.mkmachining.com/product/...-throw-levers/
I did check out those MK plastic ones. They are a little bulkier than the aluminum ones, but for the price improvement, it's liveable.
If it were me, I would pay the extra $5 for the MKM carbon fiber nylon version. Looks like better quality, and I'll bet it's stiffer than the basic printed? version:
Comment
-
-
MK Machining makes high quality stuff. I have one of their polymer throw levers and a level on my Athlon Ares BTR, and it fits & works great. Be aware that the polymer texture (from 3D printing) attracts lint from my bag and dust & debris in the field, but it does its job well. If it really bothers you, you can probably file it smooth, but I don't mind.I like the idea of the throw lever, but the price is sobering.
What do you think of this one? It is polymer.
https://www.mkmachining.com/product/...-throw-levers/WTB: Beretta 92/M9 series (non-railed), Remington 1100 LT-20,Comment
-
Mustang, if you want to pay even less, you can just use a "Breakaway nylon coaster" as they're called. Even bulkier than the MK, but they get the job done, and they're really cheap:
Very popular actually. You just screw it down onto your focus ring, then trim the excess with a wire cutter.
Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,867,584
Posts: 25,159,957
Members: 357,365
Active Members: 5,086
Welcome to our newest member, Kahiau18.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 13631 users online. 33 members and 13598 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment