I see it over $1 a round a lot but with clips as mentioned. I think 7.35 ammo was stored in a cool dry place I think a lot of the 6.5 got surplused out from poor storage in Albania and Africa.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My cARcano-15
Collapse
X
-
I had a 1891 Tyro long rifle in 6.5mm, broke the range record for military rifle silhouette with it at Sacramento, shattered the old record of 1 hit out of 40 tries with a 4 out of 40 tries, terrible sights and .264 bullets in a .268 bore did not work too well.
Hornady .268 bullets at $35 per hundred gets way too expensive and are 160 grain round nose.Comment
-
At this point pretty ALL surplus carcano ammo is not recommended for firing. Having tried it, none that I had went bang. I've also heard that the powder deteriorates and gets kinda dangerous.
Far as shooting the 6.5 carcanos, each one may represent a different result. Many of the later-manufactured 6.5's will shoot just fine with .264 bullets and in some, the .268's are downright unsafe. Many earlier rifles with gain-twist will likely benefit from the larger bullet but even in those, a flat-base .264 bullet with a long bearing surface will generally produce satisfactory results.
I'm still trying to emulate Prvi Partizan's 6.5x52 123gr sp load, as it shot VERY well in 2 of my cavalry carbines. Pretty sure my problem thus far is that it doesn't like the powder I'm using. I plan to use a slower powder and magnum primers to see if I get better results.
As for reloading the 7.35x51, they seem to be much less quirky with loads. I run 38.0gr of BL-C(2) under the 128gr hornady pill with great results. Once I get the stuff and start resizing .308 bullets to use, i'll update with how they shoot.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,860,825
Posts: 25,073,566
Members: 355,125
Active Members: 5,531
Welcome to our newest member, GJag.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 4467 users online. 102 members and 4365 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 8:20 PM on 09-21-2024.

Comment