Featureless Rifles Picture Thread

[MrPlink]

From what I've read, omitting the stock portion of the FRS would leave it very questionably a pistol grip. The main reason it's not a "pistol grip" is because it is a "stock" not a grip. Not connecting to the buffer tube avoids the "thumb hole" issue of the stock.

And they are very comfortable to shoot. I like it better than the stock setup.

spot on.

I wouldnt say I like it better than a regular AR set up, but it isnt bad at all.
Not that I have that problem anymore

[tomd1584]

Nice work!

If you don't mind me asking how much is "inexpensive"?

Well, I had the complete lower receiver already. Here is what I bought to complete it. Basically the complete upper half for $540.

I picked up everything locally except the PSA upper.

PSA upper $199
LMT BCG $99 (CG marketplace)
BCM ambi charging handle $67 (Riflegear)
MOE stock $29 (Riflegear)
Thread protector $15 (Riflegear)
Nikon Scope $130 (CG marketplace)

I'm not sure what the lower would cost to build, but maybe somewhere around $300-$350 if you bought all the parts from PSA?

[baka]

Nice work!

If you don't mind me asking how much is "inexpensive"?

Here's my latest inexpensive featureless rifle I put together. It sure is fun to shoot!


PSA mid length upper
LMT BCG
BCM ambi-charging handle
BAD-AS$ ambi-selector
Norgon ambi-mag catch
Magpul fixed MOE carbine stock
Solar tactical grip wrap
Nikon P-223 3x32

[tomd1584]

Here's my latest inexpensive featureless rifle I put together. It sure is fun to shoot!


PSA mid length upper
LMT BCG
BCM ambi-charging handle
BAD-AS$ ambi-selector
Norgon ambi-mag catch
Magpul fixed MOE carbine stock
Solar tactical grip wrap
Nikon P-223 3x32

[BigBamBoo]

Thank you. It is a blast to shoot. Kids, women, etc., really enjoy shooting it due to the extreamly low recoil impulse...more of a push then a sharp blow like a larger caliber rifle...and muzzle blast.

I have really come to like the FRS-15 stock. So much so that I will be converting over my other AR's to them.

Without fail, everyone who has handled and/or shot this carbine all agree that it is very comfortable. And they all think it looks "more evil or scarier" then a regular configured AR. I agree!


.

[Sinestr]

Quarter Circle 10 Colt pattern lower, JP GMR-13/PSC-11 upper, and FRS-15 stock:

That is a clean build. Looks like fun !

[BigBamBoo]

Quarter Circle 10 Colt pattern lower, JP GMR-13/PSC-11 upper, and FRS-15 stock:

[Fot]

my first featureless...a lefty with custom fin integrated with 1911 grips

I like that 1911 grip set up... I started something along those lines with a hammerhead awhile back but got side tracked..

[ritter]

Looking at a setup like this, is there a reason why one doesn't make only the downward angling grip without the tail part that curves back up, and use more traditional fixed stock? Basically just replacing the pistol grip with the first part of this grip only, to be more or less a VERY angled, non-descending "pistol" grip?

From what I've read, omitting the stock portion of the FRS would leave it very questionably a pistol grip. The main reason it's not a "pistol grip" is because it is a "stock" not a grip. Not connecting to the buffer tube avoids the "thumb hole" issue of the stock.

And they are very comfortable to shoot. I like it better than the stock setup.

[texterter]

i think they made this for NY.

[Standard]

No BB required

Looking at a setup like this, is there a reason why one doesn't make only the downward angling grip without the tail part that curves back up, and use more traditional fixed stock? Basically just replacing the pistol grip with the first part of this grip only, to be more or less a VERY angled, non-descending "pistol" grip?

[70runner]

my first featureless...a lefty with custom fin integrated with 1911 grips

[texterter]

nice color on that AK furniture.

[Echidin]

[MrPlink]

Can't tell from pix but there are potentially 2 problems with that set up.
1) could be construed as a thumb hole stock (especially if the FRS portion is in contact with the ace stock portion

2) if the FRS portion is NOT attached to the stock portion, then it may be a pistol grip, as the FRS legality presumes the entire device is actually a stock, not a grip. The argument for being a stock becomes hard to make IF it isn't actually attached to the stock. And again, if it IS attached, see issue #1.

But that's not legal advice, so approach it however you please.