New BCM Stock in the works

[762.DEFENSE]

Ew. Rather pick up the up and coming Magpul MOE SL

[Metal Magic]

That Magpul stock is ace

[Niviticus]

Looks different that's for sure

[Jasonaspears]

No interest to me. Back to the drawing board.

[Losd619]

You guys should check the specs on this stock that were just released. Innovative to say the least. Gonna make other companies go back to the drawing board. I want one pretty bad after seeing this stuff.

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014/05/04/bravo-companys-bcm-gunfighter-stock/

[blockster]

It's definitely not the most aesthetically pleasing stock. We'll see as how it works. I'd like to do some testing of it and see how it is. I have an EMOD right not but more than likely going to upgrade to the B5 Sopmod Basic Stock.

[firebert]

I hope BCM would start putting the fugly stock on their rifles and allow the stock on the B5 Sopmod stocks to replenish. haha pun

[3lixer]

It's definitely not the most aesthetically pleasing stock. We'll see as how it works. I'd like to do some testing of it and see how it is. I have an EMOD right not but more than likely going to upgrade to the B5 Sopmod Basic Stock.

Send me a PM when you do this and I'll buy your emod.

[Nathan Krynn]

Just like my SCAR.

I so was going to say this.

[bender152]

While I'm not fond of the design, at 60 bucks, the stock is cheap enough to try out.

Lightweight (7.5 ounces) and priced at just $59.95, the BCM Gunfighter stock is a great value for TFB readers who need a good no-nonsense collapsible stock for their AR-15/AR-10 carbine. - See more at: http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2....XQ18Y3Lr.dpuf

[floogy]

Lot's of complaints about it being ugly. No one cares about function over form? How does it perform? Looks are not a primary concern for me. It looks to be snag free, lightweight, does not rattle and costs $60. The CTR is the lowest cost friction lock stock I'm aware of and it's not my first choice. The MOE SL doesn't look better or much different BTW.

Unless you make your living with a rifle slung over your chest all day, looks are all that matter. It seems looks are a primary concern to a lot of people, which is fine. But that doesn't mean it won't be a good stock.

[Jasonaspears]

Lot's of complaints about it being ugly. No one cares about function over form? How does it perform? Looks are not a primary concern for me. It looks to be snag free, lightweight, does not rattle and costs $60. The CTR is the lowest cost friction lock stock I'm aware of and it's not my first choice. The MOE SL doesn't look better or much different BTW.

Unless you make your living with a rifle slung over your chest all day, looks are all that matter. It seems looks are a primary concern to a lot of people, which is fine. But that doesn't mean it won't be a good stock.

After spending more time looking at this I agree with you. Many folks including myself buy based on aesthetics instead of function. Maybe it will turn out to be a good design. Just not for me right now.