New BCM Stock in the works

[pc_load_letter]

Not sure how you are comparing those two stocks. I wouldn't use that stock you linked if somebody paid me. Where is the cheek weld? That little piece of foam?

How fat is your cheek that you need something more than that?

I own that stock if it wasn't close to $200. But I will stick with my MOE which works just fine.

[FNH5-7]

Not sure how you are comparing those two stocks. I wouldn't use that stock you linked if somebody paid me. Where is the cheek weld? That little piece of foam?

Based on the photos I've seen on the thread there seems to be a trend to put as little real estate on the back end as possible.

[TacticalChihuahua]

If what they're trying to do is prop up a new trend of small stocks to get us all to dump our current stocks(even though they work perfectly) I'm not buyin. What ever it is their trying to do, these guys beat them to it a long time ago:





This^^

Business must be slow lately. Trying to think up more **** to sell us IMO. Who knows maybe they get lucky, attach a guy who is a big name in the industry to it saying how great it is and it sells like hot cakes.

Not sure how we are comparing a fixed stock with no cheek weld to the bcm... Not a big fan of the BCM (from the initial looks at least) but don't see how this stock is a better solution

[Antagon3]

Am I the only one who things that rifle in general is ugly as a turd?

The receivers are different colors, and there are at least 4 different shades of tan on there.

Do not want.

[pc_load_letter]

Not sure how we are comparing a fixed stock with no cheek weld to the bcm... Not a big fan of the BCM (from the initial looks at least) but don't see how this stock is a better solution

That stock does have an adjustable lop.

I get a kick out of people saying stock xyz is a horrible stock with no cheek weld versus abc stock that has better check weld.

Seems to me that I can get my cheek on any dang stock I have. Shoot, I can even get a cheek weld with that arm brace.

All these operators make me chuckle.

[bigdrunk92037]

I didn't think we needed another stock option for an AR. So many good choices already. I don't know.......

[mlevans66]

That MFT stock is ugly as sin as well. Nothing pretty about that thing. Looks like a prosthetic runners leg

Do you like the paracord models any better?

That's a mother loving CTR!

[mlevans66]

Am I the only one who things that rifle in general is ugly as a turd?
The receivers are different colors, and there are at least 4 different shades of tan on there.

Do not want.

............no

[egpost916]

Ugly. Too many good options out there to go with this stock.

[9mmepiphany]

That's a mother loving CTR!

Well, I guess...

...if you ignore the different placement of the QD socket, the different angle of the recoil pad, the different style of the adjustment release, the lack of the adjustment lock, and the additional attachment slots

[Germz]

ugh...the iphone in that picture ruins the whole thing for me.
0/10 will not buy

[mlevans66]

Well, I guess...

...if you ignore the different placement of the QD socket, the different angle of the recoil pad, the different style of the adjustment release, the lack of the adjustment lock, and the additional attachment slots

Ok then MOE wannabe.

[Mitch]

Am I the only one who things that rifle in general is ugly as a turd?

The receivers are different colors, and there are at least 4 different shades of tan on there.

Just like my SCAR.

[FNH5-7]

Not sure how we are comparing a fixed stock with no cheek weld to the bcm... Not a big fan of the BCM (from the initial looks at least) but don't see how this stock is a better solution

The socom is not fixed.

From the angle that I'm seeing all of the stocks in this thread, again, is as little real estate on the back as possible.

[missiontrails]

The Crane is a very well thought out stock design...it's just heavy

Heavy? What? SOPMODS are LIGHT.

Edit: 342g, heavier than my CTR.