Was "multi" caliber acceptable during the last AWB

[StuckInTheP.R.O.Ca]

.... but in the end, it doesn't matter what caliber the registration says since there is no law that says that you can't ever change it from its original configuration.

^This. As far as I'm concerned.

[BroncoBob]

Noticed it asked from who you got the firearm from...... Heck I didn't keep that information. Will the FFL work for this?

[skyhanger00]

Wow, I just realized it requires a CA DL or ID to register. So what will happen to all the military personnel stationed in CA or people here only temporarily for work? Before they can fit a mag lock on their rifles and leave std capacity mags at home, now there is no way they can bring them here.

Another way this legislation needs to be litigated!!!

Current law:


I'm not sure how that will work with the new law, but you need a out-of state address.

[jcwatchdog]

Noticed it asked from who you got the firearm from...... Heck I didn't keep that information. Will the FFL work for this?

It will for me....

[dyson]

Noticed it asked from who you got the firearm from...... Heck I didn't keep that information. Will the FFL work for this?

Ya what if its an 80.....can i put DEEZ NUTZ

[BroncoBob]

Ya what if its an 80.....can i put DEEZ NUTZ

That would most likely get a knock at the door response.....

[NorCalAthlete]

Not if that's the serial number.

Unique my a**...I think there's going to be a whole buttload of "Cal: multi" "SN: MOLON LABE 123456" or something similar getting registered. I mean really...millions of ARs? There's bound to be dupes.

[MrPlink]

Dupe in serial number alone is meaningless. You need the name of manufacturer, city, and model as well. If all of those are dupes, well that could be interesting. . .

[JohnZ]

How accurate do we have to be with the Purchase Date? Exact, or do they just want the year and month?

[Renaissance Redneck]

Dupe in serial number alone is miningless. You need the name of manufacturer, city, and model as well. If all of those are dupes, well that could be interesting. . .

Yes indeed. I'm imagining a bunch of 80%'s being engraved and registered with "SN 000001". And then, having a WHOLE SAFE full of identical receivers/rifles with "SN 000001" !!!

[nitroxdiver]

How accurate do we have to be with the Purchase Date? Exact, or do they just want the year and month?

Great question. How in the hell are people going to remember or find out when they purchased their rifles, even the where or from whom part will be difficult for many.


Sent from classified location using Tapatalk.

[not-fishing]

A discussion with an FFL informed me that a single lower could be registered between multiple individuals (in this case father & sons).

I wonder if that is true.

[proraptor]

I dont remember the time date location or from whom I bought my rifles from. They are just gonna have to deal with it.....good thing I lost most of them In a boating accident

[RED VASQUEZ]

Not sure if related, but where does a multi caliber marked lower built in .22 lr fit in?

[Whiterabbit]

Dupe in serial number alone is meaningless. You need the name of manufacturer, city, and model as well. If all of those are dupes, well that could be interesting. . .

Model: Ar-15
City: Los Angeles
Caliber: Multi
SN: NA
MFG: Self
Date: XXXXX (This one will be unique)

Minus mfg date, how many of these do you think are in LA? how about Bakersfield? How about every other big city in CA? Gonna be fun. Build parties? There will be 20 with the same mfg date. Times 50 build parties over the past years that's 1000 of these things with the same identifiers minus 20 unique build dates. The database is gonna be a glorious mess.

How many people, when they bought ONE 80 bought like 20 of them?

Now that we have Calguns to help registrants (God forbid), it's gonna be very interesting.

Let's just hope the law does not pass. Have you read the restrictions on possession location for RAW? it's pretty strict against those of us who are actually law abiding citizens.