Yes, tactical blunder by the FBI, who were staking out an area based on a hunch, but the point was simply the fact that the perps were shot multiple times, upper body and face, but continued fighting. There are countless stories about all sorts of different scenarios, but this one was related to the aftermath and development of the 10mm Auto that became the .40 S&W. This in part could have lead to the possible decline of the 9mm rnd as standard issue, even though it wasn't used in this particular incident. Interesting that the backup vehicles with additional agents did have MP5s that were not used b/c they showed up too late. The end.
It's obvious from the ballistics of the 3 main handgun rounds are similar to a degree and when one compares them to a rifle round, they're definitely underpowered. Some people get killed from one .22 bullet and another will live after being shot 10 times by a .45. Like someone said previously, the 9mm, "it's about velocity" and that is dictated by the length of the brl... like every other round out there. I believe the standard side arm of the military is the Beretta M9 and the last time I was at Iron Sights in O'side, I spoke to some jarheads who were practicing for their annual test. They did not seem happy about fielding a 9mm b/c of it's stopping power, they felt the military was simply trying to save money. Whatever, that was just their perspective.
The ballistics gel tests on page 1 don't lie either, but I find this video somewhat compelling in the argument for something else other than 9mm -
Like I also said before, it's an iconic firearm, I would love to own one.
It's obvious from the ballistics of the 3 main handgun rounds are similar to a degree and when one compares them to a rifle round, they're definitely underpowered. Some people get killed from one .22 bullet and another will live after being shot 10 times by a .45. Like someone said previously, the 9mm, "it's about velocity" and that is dictated by the length of the brl... like every other round out there. I believe the standard side arm of the military is the Beretta M9 and the last time I was at Iron Sights in O'side, I spoke to some jarheads who were practicing for their annual test. They did not seem happy about fielding a 9mm b/c of it's stopping power, they felt the military was simply trying to save money. Whatever, that was just their perspective.
The ballistics gel tests on page 1 don't lie either, but I find this video somewhat compelling in the argument for something else other than 9mm -
Like I also said before, it's an iconic firearm, I would love to own one.
Comment