Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

HK legal rifle?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    tiger222
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2006
    • 2396

    Originally posted by killbyte
    Which one would be better for protection the USC, SL8 or HK USP? I've been also directed towards colts.
    Condoms

    If you are worried about the collapse of western civiliation, none of them.
    For self protection, the USP compact / P2000
    Seriously missing the 80's.....

    Comment

    • #17
      tiger222
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2006
      • 2396

      No the barreled upper on the HK91 is the serialized part, therefore the banned part of the gun. The lower trigger pack is not seralized and can be purchased freely from many places.
      Seriously missing the 80's.....

      Comment

      • #18
        deservetodie
        Junior Member
        • Apr 2010
        • 2

        ya as soon as i hit reply i realized that it was the upper that has a serial number (doh) so i deleted that comment.

        Comment

        • #19
          CrippledPidgeon
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2007
          • 1765

          Originally posted by killbyte
          Which one would be better for protection the USC, SL8 or HK USP? I've been also directed towards colts.
          Depends on the situation, location, etc.

          If it's to defend a home in suburbia, either the USP or the USC because the pistol caliber rounds won't be likely to penetrate as many walls as a 5.56mm rifle round from the SL8. However, if you're defending a ranch, the SL8 will be able to reach out farther and more accurately to kill both 2 and 4 legged pests that enter the property and threaten the crops/livestock/whatever.

          Comment

          • #20
            ke6guj
            Moderator
            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
            • Nov 2003
            • 23725

            Originally posted by Oceanbob
            How about my HK SP-89..?.It's registered currently on the AW list. Can I add a bullet button and remove it from the list..?

            Thanks
            Bob
            well, since an SP-89 is not a rifle, it wouldn't be included on the above list.


            Yes, you can render the SP-89 into a non-AW config (fixed mag release with a <11-round mag) and then contact CADOJ about removing it fro mthe registry. At that point, you could sell it in CA.

            Originally posted by KCDS
            no you can't
            if you were refering to Oceanbob's post, that would be incorrect.
            Originally posted by tiger222
            Bob

            Actually registered AW PISTOLS can be removed from the list and sold with in CA, RIFLES cannot, but you have to make sure it's been de-AW'd, ie bullet button and single shot mag for transfer.
            correct that AW pistols can be rendered into a non-AW config (assuming that it isn't named on the AW lists), but there is no reason that an AW rifle can't as well. There is no need to make the pistol a single-shot pistol in order to transfer it. As long as it is not an AW, it can be PPT'ed in CA as a roster-exempt transfer. The only reason you would need to go single-shot is if you were gonna ship it and couldn't do a PPT.


            Once the DROS is approved to the new purchaser, you need to send a letter to DOJ that you are no longer in possession of the pistol and that is has been reconfigured in a way the it does not violate SB23.
            There is no need to file a NLIP on a handgun that you transfered to another person in CA through a dealer. As part of the DROS, it automatically gets registered to the new owner and your AFS records should be updated to show that you are no longer the owner.

            Now, I would suggest that you deal with getting the AW registration cancelled (after it made into an non-AW config first) before you attempt to transfer it to another person.
            Jack



            Do you want an AOW or C&R SBS/SBR in CA?

            No posts of mine are to be construed as legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

            Comment

            Working...
            UA-8071174-1