Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

LMT 308 vs FN SCAR H

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #31
    acaligunner
    Calguns Addict
    • Oct 2008
    • 6448

    Originally posted by Peter W Bush
    Who cares about whether or not it can take P mags? They're both great rifles. I would buy the SCAR.
    It's not a big problem, but P-Mags have proven themselves in being a very reliable magazine.

    And since most feeding problems could be traced to a bad magazine, I'm just saying.

    thanks,

    acaligunner
    Vida Loca Homes

    Comment

    • #32
      Group B
      Member
      • Nov 2008
      • 490

      Originally posted by advocatusdiaboli
      I have to ask: what's wrong with the Rock River Arms LAR-8? I've seen good reviews of them. Is there something I don't know?
      Bushmaster licensed the design of their BAR-10 to RRA, which released it as the LAR-8.

      IIRC some LAR-8 owners have had issues with some FAL mags (was it with older, beat-up mags?) and feeding issues.
      "I intend to go in harm's way.... I have a fighting ship and I will never retreat from an enemy force..."

      - CDR E.E. Evans, USN, October 27, 1943
      at USS Johnston's commissioning

      Comment

      • #33
        cmace22
        Veteran Member
        • Jan 2008
        • 2717

        Originally posted by acaligunner
        It's not a big problem, but P-Mags have proven themselves in being a very reliable magazine.

        And since most feeding problems could be traced to a bad magazine, I'm just saying.

        thanks,

        acaligunner
        For me the cost would be the only issue. If they turn out to be 50 dollar mags with little after-market support it will put a damper on things.

        Pmags IMHO would be the way to go. Too bad FNH didnt get the memo that DPMS/KAC style mags were the way to go in 308, 7.62 NATO.

        Comment

        • #34
          MrPlink
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Mar 2010
          • 12532

          Scar H is def out there and in use. Border patrol and private contractors are also using them.
          The California Moderate Centrist Militia member in exile

          disclaimer:
          everything I post is for arguendo and entertainment purposes only, and should not be construed to be legal advice

          Comment

          • #35
            Pryde
            Veteran Member
            • Oct 2005
            • 2506

            SCAR program was cancelled due to costs, not due to any sort of design failure.

            In case you haven't noticed, we are in a recession and defense budgets are getting slashed.

            Comment

            • #36
              technique
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Jan 2008
              • 10639

              I'm just going to put this in here..

              The title was misleading on the article, and most apparently read only the title...

              SOCOM MK-16 canceled ~ NOT MK-17

              SOCOM will use the funds originally for Mk16's to buy Mk17's instead. That's NOT canceled!
              California Uber Alles, California Uber Alles
              Uber Alles California, Uber Alles California

              I am Governor Jerry Brown, My aura smiles and never frowns, Soon I will be President...

              Comment

              • #37
                acaligunner
                Calguns Addict
                • Oct 2008
                • 6448

                From what I've heard, the SCAR L (5.56), was put on hold because the M4/M16 can still fill most of the needs of Combat soldiers.

                The Military is looking for a 308/7.62x51 rifle, The AR-10/SCAR H are being tested for that role.

                acaligunner
                Vida Loca Homes

                Comment

                • #38
                  technique
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Jan 2008
                  • 10639

                  Originally posted by acaligunner
                  From what I've heard, the SCAR L (5.56), was put on hold because the M4/M16 can still fill most of the needs of Combat

                  acaligunner
                  Pretty much. The SCAR L and M4, though different, still fire a 5.56, still have the same range, and both have the same effect on the target. So, SOCOM decided on the 17 instead. However, we still may see other places picking up the 17.
                  California Uber Alles, California Uber Alles
                  Uber Alles California, Uber Alles California

                  I am Governor Jerry Brown, My aura smiles and never frowns, Soon I will be President...

                  Comment

                  • #39
                    lehn20
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 2355

                    Good copy, I knew I had some of it right

                    Still doesn't change the fact that the SOCOM guys are braking the SCAR-H stocks though.
                    I would still take a nice FAL over the SCAR.

                    Don't forget the HK417 is being renamed and coming out for civilians also.......
                    I will take the LMT 308 though..

                    Comment

                    • #40
                      Endless
                      Banned
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 1881

                      I would say go Hk mr762.

                      I would not waste money on a SCAR anything. They truely have nothing to offer me.

                      LMT is not a bad rifle at all.

                      If it has to be between the two go LMT.

                      Comment

                      • #41
                        Cyc Wid It
                        Veteran Member
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 4485

                        The Scar to me is hideous. It looks like one of those Subarus or Avalanches with the plastic all over the sides. Again, this is a strictly aesthetic complaint.
                        WTS all BNIB: Colt S70 Repro, HK45c, Gen4 G19

                        Comment

                        • #42
                          The DRis
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 593

                          Still doesn't change the fact that the SOCOM guys are braking the SCAR-H stocks though.
                          I would still take a nice FAL over the SCAR.
                          Is this being out of your heinie or do you have proof?

                          This BS about stuff being plastic so not to be trusted is just that... BS. Glocks, XD's, M&P's, magazines, pistol grips, stocks are all polymer.

                          Comment

                          • #43
                            Plisk
                            Veteran Member
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 3007

                            Technique is correct, the Mk. 16 is being discontinued for use at the moment but the Mk. 17s are still going strong.

                            SEALs are still being issued both today though.
                            Last edited by Plisk; 07-28-2010, 9:31 PM.
                            "If it wears out, replace it. If it breaks, upgrade." -Cranky Air Force Vet.

                            Kevin

                            Comment

                            • #44
                              Toolbox X
                              Veteran Member
                              • Jan 2005
                              • 2602

                              I'm trying to find a SCAR 17S for a good price right now.

                              Comment

                              • #45
                                ddindetroit
                                PURVEYOR OF HIGH END ITEM
                                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                                • Jul 2008
                                • 1168

                                He is correct

                                Originally posted by X-NewYawker
                                Saw SCAR the other day.
                                I'm sticking with LMT I don't like the charging handle moving around while I'm shooting.
                                also, piston is better for 5.56 squirt guns. 308 not shot with same frquency (ie/. Ammo costs)


                                He is correct. SCAR is more expensive and LMT parts are more readily available. Lot of SCAR parts are proprietary. Lots of plastic-- for a lot of money. However, if you had to carry one all day or for several weeks, the SCAR becames a beauty queen because ounces equal pounds and pounds equals pain. I love the LMT to shoot but I would hate to carry one for an extended period of time.

                                ddindetroit
                                Last edited by ddindetroit; 02-24-2011, 11:33 PM.
                                CLICK HERE TO SEE A VARIETY OF WONDERFUL AND RARE HIGH END PISTOLS THAT I HAVE FOR SALE!!!
                                CLICK HERE TO SEE A VARIETY OF WONDERFUL AND RARE HIGH END LONG GUNS THAT I HAVE FOR SALE!!!
                                CLICK HERE TO SEE A VARIETY AMMUNITION THAT I HAVE FOR SALE!!!
                                CLICK HERE TO SEE A VARIETY OF DESIREABLE SHOOTING ACCESSORIES THAT I HAVE FOR SALE!!!

                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1