Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recommend me a 357 lever rifle
Collapse
X
-
That may be a CG first!
Spyder
"You guys need to take more drugs. Then you can TASTE the sound, and HEAR the light!" -
I've got Marlin 1894C. I prefer the Marlins because it ejects the spent casings from the side. This allows scopes or other sights to be mounted on the receiver. The Winchester ejects from the top so mounting anything is not possible. Now I know some say mounting a scope on a leveraction is sacreligious but peep or aperture sights work real well. I've got a Skinner Lo Pro Sight on mine.
Comment
-
All current made 357 mag leverguns can have issues shooting both the shorter 38 sp cartridge and the longer 357 mag cartridge. Marlin, Rossi, etc., all of them are prone to feed issues. If you have one that feeds both out of the box you got lucky, it's that simple.
My experience is that the Rossi's are better than the Marlins. Send an email to Stevesgunz and ask his advice, he's an expert on leverguns and does the warranty work for many manufacturers. It's sort of like asking the appliance repair man which washer he'd buy.
I have a tuned Rossi M92 that feeds both 357mag and 38sp. I love this gun and my only wish would be that it had nicer wood like on the 45lc Winchester 92 take-down. If I can spare the cash I'd like to buy the Winchester made model 92 in 357 mag, just because I know how nice they are. The 45 LC version is the nicest levergun I have ever handled and the walnut is drop dead gorgous! My Rossi action is smoother than the Winchester action but the 45 lc cartridge feeds better because it it's shape. In a levergun my 1rst choice will always be 45lc and 357mag is second.
My only beef with the 45 lc is that the ammo has become hard to find making it expensive to shoot. 38sp on the other hand is more available but you still need to be saving your brass.
These guns are very much fun to shoot. I can sit at the range with my 16" Rossi in 357mag/38sp and take slow shots at 150 yards metal targets all day long and just keep on similing. Next time I go shooting I'm taking them out!Comment
-
I have a Winchester in .357 and have never ever had a problem or a single jam in .38 or in .357 , they are just a fun gun to shoot my girlfriends daughter loves this rifle almost no recoil.Comment
-
Marlin definitely. Their action is amazing and only gets better. the side ejection is smoother and more consistent than top ejection. The only other option is Henry.
I personally have a Marlin 1885 Guide chambered in 45/70. I love that gun more than anything it is my absolute favorite to shoot.Comment
-
I have a tuned Rossi M92 that feeds both 357mag and 38sp. I love this gun and my only wish would be that it had nicer wood like on the 45lc Winchester 92 take-down. If I can spare the cash I'd like to buy the Winchester made model 92 in 357 mag, just because I know how nice they are.
I know the solution! You can sell me the Rossi and go buy yourself a WinchestersigpicComment
-
Like ArmyGI said, the Marlin is designed around pistol length rounds, while the Winchester 94 is designed around rifle length ammunition. A good choice would be a quality Winchester 1892 clone, or the Marlin 94. I have a Browning 92 in 357 that is excellent. They are hard to find, but well worth it. There are plenty of them around in 44 Mag, but in that caliber with full power loads, the light carbine kicks like a mule.Comment
-
This thread seems to raise very conflicting accounts. Marlin is good, winchester is good, rossi sucks, uberti is fine, and vis versa.
If I want a NIB, utterly reliable, never jams, never misfeeds model 92 or 94 - with any quality finish, who would be the best? Seems to be about equal between people advocating for rossi and marlin. What about Uberti/cimarron? Something like this.
Originally posted by orangegloCool...Originally posted by jl123story...Originally posted by dadoodybro...Comment
-
Like ArmyGI said, the Marlin is designed around pistol length rounds, while the Winchester 94 is designed around rifle length ammunition. A good choice would be a quality Winchester 1892 clone, or the Marlin 94. I have a Browning 92 in 357 that is excellent. They are hard to find, but well worth it. There are plenty of them around in 44 Mag, but in that caliber with full power loads, the light carbine kicks like a mule.Join the NRA today!Comment
-
This thread seems to raise very conflicting accounts. Marlin is good, winchester is good, rossi sucks, uberti is fine, and vis versa.
If I want a NIB, utterly reliable, never jams, never misfeeds model 92 or 94 - with any quality finish, who would be the best? Seems to be about equal between people advocating for rossi and marlin. What about Uberti/cimarron? Something like this.
http://www.buffaloarms.com/browse.cfm/4,5164.html
The Marlin is still made in USA and is basically the same design that has served well for 100 years. Parts and accessories are available. If you find a 30 year old used one, you can fix it relatively easily. Not always the case with the 92 copies. Given your requirements, I would go with the Marlin.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,850,533
Posts: 24,948,796
Members: 352,400
Active Members: 6,553
Welcome to our newest member, LoChapo.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 4295 users online. 160 members and 4135 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment