Featureless Muzzle Device that has low flash

[dodgeit101]

I want to build a new featureless rifle, most of my current rifles are BBs.

Was wondering if anybody has experience on which muzzle brake /comps has low flash signature? I'm asking because I have night vision and I don't want the binocular to flash white every time I fire.

[HibikiR]

Wouldn't that reduction make it a flash hider by definition?

[munkeeboi]

Kinda contradictory as a featureless rifle can’t have a muzzle device that reduces flash

[Sparrow Dynamics]

Wouldn't that reduction make it a flash hider by definition?

Yep.

[theLBC]

are fake cans considered flash hiders?

there are also brakes with sleeves, although i can speak to the legality of those either.

[dodgeit101]

Wouldn't that reduction make it a flash hider by definition?

Stay with me here, it's possible that a muzzle device could have flash reducing but don't put them in the advertising.

WHOA...

[Ajaxx]

Stay with me here, it's possible that a muzzle device could have flash reducing but don't put them in the advertising.



WHOA...

You're correct, you forgot that on CG most just come to argue or flame your post.

Sent from my SM-G930VC using Tapatalk

[dodgeit101]

You're correct, you forgot that on CG most just come to argue or flame your post.

Sent from my SM-G930VC using Tapatalk

Lol I forgot that most of people aren't helpful or have a clue.

Let me help myself out or some other souls that are in the situation as me.

https://www.vsevenweaponsystems.com/v7-titanium-a2compensator-extended/

SEE IT'S SOLD AS A COMP.

[HibikiR]

Stay with me here, it's possible that a muzzle device could have flash reducing but don't put them in the advertising.

WHOA...

You forgot that CA has been dealing with this for years Padawan.

Advertising is one thing, design is another.

Look at the PWS FSC gen1 series. Even an ATF letter calling it a brake wasn't enough to counter the design features triggering feature status.

MFI had to design 2018 compliant muzzle brakes to conform to CADOJ regulations, before they made products that were like what you're looking for.

"flash suppressor" means any device designed, intended, OR THAT FUNCTIONS to perceptibly REDUCE or redirect muzzle flash from the shooter's field of vision. CCR 11 s5469 (b)

[dodgeit101]

Okay so we go with that definition, doesn't that make most of these comps and brakes ill legal because don't most of these things have some kind of redirect muzzle or flash properties?

[HibikiR]

Okay so we go with that definition, doesn't that make most of these comps and brakes ill legal because don't most of these things have some kind of redirect muzzle or flash properties?

Welcome to the state of featureless.

That's why people go with something like a closed front A2 or a thread protector. Loud, flashy, but legal.


For you, fixed mag is the only way to get the NV-friendly flash reduction without going into AW territory.

[ThatFishGuy]

Linear comps with a larger blast chamber seem to show less flash than others that blast gasses to the side and upward, for whatever that's worth. The design itself is not made to affect the flash, rather to redirect the noise. I've noticed less flash from those types though...

[n8vrmind]

Put on magnified optic and you will not see the flash.

[LDL]

How about a surefire blast warden on top of a surefire socom muzzle brake?

https://www.turners.com/surefire/surefire-warden-blast-diffuser-634623

There have been discussions about this device on this website

https://calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=1417274

Like a lot of the gun laws in CA, its in the grey

[morrcarr67]

Yup, flash redirectors are the way to go.

http://www.kineti-tech.com/kineti-tech-muzzle-brake-with-sound-redirect-with-13-16-x-16-threaded-sleeve-2-piece/

Sent from my Nokia 7.1 using Tapatalk