Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Bayonet-lug bipod: thoughts?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • reidnez
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 1852

    Bayonet-lug bipod: thoughts?

    I'm almost done with my M4-gery build and I'm considering a bipod for occasional use, mostly to zero sights and optics.



    Does anyone have any experience with these? I realize for that price it's probably going to be pretty low-quality compared to a Harris or other name-brand. I'm attracted to the idea of using the bayonet lug because, well, I don't plan on using a bayonet and rail space is at a premium on carbines.

    The other option I've found is getting a bayonet lug rail adapter, then a rail mount for a bipod, and the bipod itself. But this would run me around $200 and like I said, I don't use bipods much.

    Any thoughts? Thanks in advance.
    Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. -Andre Gide
  • #2
    shark92651
    Vendor/Retailer
    • Oct 2006
    • 5431

    I have a bipod on my rifle-length precision build, but that is attached to the free-float handguard and not transferring any pressure to the barrel. On a carbine, I would probably just shoot off a bag for the occasional use or zeroing.
    sigpic
    www.riflegear.com

    Comment

    • #3
      30Cal
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2006
      • 1487

      It mounts to the barrel, so I would expect accuracy to suffer for it.

      Comment

      • #4
        reidnez
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 1852

        Thanks guys, both good points. I may just try to borrow some bags when I go the range or shoot prone. My next build (long-barrel varmint gun) will definitely have a quality bipod, though.
        Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. -Andre Gide

        Comment

        • #5
          shark92651
          Vendor/Retailer
          • Oct 2006
          • 5431

          Even a well-stuffed backpack makes a good support for your carbine when shooting prone or off a bench.
          sigpic
          www.riflegear.com

          Comment

          • #6
            wash
            Calguns Addict
            • Aug 2007
            • 9011

            I would use sand bags also.

            This reminds me of an article in Shotgun News, they were testing an AR that had a free-float rail system and they added a sling mount that bolted on through the front sight.

            That might not sound so bad except the whole reason why the free-float hand guards were developed was to remove sling tension from the barrel...
            sigpic
            Originally posted by oaklander
            Dear Kevin,

            You suck!!! Your are wrong!!! Stop it!!!
            Proud CGF and CGN donor. SAF life member. Former CRPA member. Gpal beta tester (it didn't work). NRA member.

            Comment

            • #7
              reidnez
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2009
              • 1852

              Originally posted by wash
              I would use sand bags also.

              This reminds me of an article in Shotgun News, they were testing an AR that had a free-float rail system and they added a sling mount that bolted on through the front sight.

              That might not sound so bad except the whole reason why the free-float hand guards were developed was to remove sling tension from the barrel...
              I'm not accuracy-obsessed with this 16" build to worry about such things. If it manages 2MOA or even a little worse, that will be just dandy. I'll build a precision AR next time...
              Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. -Andre Gide

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1