The spur has a different possible issue then "conspicuously beneath the action"
Ok so if you notice "pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon” is the title. It is NOT found in the definition! (Note: this is why grip fins are thought to be ok despite their angle downward)
So the actual definition talks about:
"a pistol style grasp in which the web of the trigger hand (between the thumb and index finger) can be placed below the top of the exposed portion of the trigger while firing."
Now there are a couple things here... does the spur constituent as a "pistol style grasp"? Probably not...
BUT by its design it does allow for the "web of the trigger hand (between the thumb and index finger) can be placed below the top of the exposed portion of the trigger".
So while its designed to be NY legal. It's a sort of gray area in CA...
"pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon”
means a grip that allows for a pistol style grasp in which the web of the trigger hand (between the thumb and index finger) can be placed below the top of the exposed portion of the trigger while firing.
means a grip that allows for a pistol style grasp in which the web of the trigger hand (between the thumb and index finger) can be placed below the top of the exposed portion of the trigger while firing.
So the actual definition talks about:
"a pistol style grasp in which the web of the trigger hand (between the thumb and index finger) can be placed below the top of the exposed portion of the trigger while firing."
Now there are a couple things here... does the spur constituent as a "pistol style grasp"? Probably not...
BUT by its design it does allow for the "web of the trigger hand (between the thumb and index finger) can be placed below the top of the exposed portion of the trigger".
So while its designed to be NY legal. It's a sort of gray area in CA...
Comment