Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

308 barrel length

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #46
    Merc1138
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Feb 2009
    • 19742

    Did someone say "dinosaur"?


    Just as silly as some salesguy trying to tell the OP that 18" bbl is somehow "ideal" with no context.
    Originally posted by sdnative13
    I'm no expert but maybe they were suggesting an 18" barrel for a semi-auto ar type platform. Like so many others said not good for bolt action
    That doesn't make any sense either...

    Comment

    • #47
      Josh3239
      Calguns Addict
      • Dec 2006
      • 9200

      Originally posted by morthrane
      Just to play the devil's advocate...

      For the average shooter, an 18" .308 barrel might actually be ideal. How many actually manage to shoot beyond 500 yards? An 18" should burn the powder load, so no ginormous fireball. A shorter barrel-- all else being equal and prior to considering wind-- is going to be more accurate than a longer barrel. You can have a heavier barrel that's not going to be as ungainly as a longer barrel of the same profile.
      Your not wrong, but the key word is ideal. And since no situation like minus 500 yards appears to have been stated, the idea that an 18'' barrel is ideal for a 308 because anything longer is inefficient is fallacious. Even if the stated purpose was 300 yards, why would an 18'' barrel be more ideal than a 16'' or a 20''? There are no shortage of guys on the 100 yard line rocking 22''-24'' 308 bolt guns, is that less ideal? An 18'' is capable and with thick barrel it'll be more stiff, but that isn't the issue.

      Comment

      • #48
        ar15barrels
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Jan 2006
        • 57182

        So much fail.
        Randall Rausch

        AR work: www.ar15barrels.com
        Handguns: www.handgunbarrels.com
        Bolt actions: www.700barrels.com
        Foreign Semi Autos: www.akbarrels.com
        Most work done while you wait on a scheduled shop visit.

        Comment

        • #49
          ExtremeX
          Calguns Addict
          • Sep 2010
          • 7160

          Originally posted by five.five-six
          Sure, but you would need a primary arms red dot. None of those dinosaur scopes can see that far.
          Originally posted by Merc1138
          Did someone say "dinosaur"?


          Just as silly as some salesguy trying to tell the OP that 18" bbl is somehow "ideal" with no context.

          That doesn't make any sense either...
          I watched that entire video... and I watched it though my primary arms RDS...

          The video had a really deep blue tint to it... boom boom acka lacka boom
          ExtremeX

          Comment

          • #50
            JTROKS
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Nov 2007
            • 13093

            Optimum barrel length depends on what gunpowder and bullet weight is being used.
            The wise man said just find your place
            In the eye of the storm
            Seek the roses along the way
            Just beware of the thorns...
            K. Meine

            Comment

            • #51
              Pauliedad
              CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
              • Dec 2012
              • 2095

              Was measuring FPS last weekend to validate some of my reloads. Also happened to be at a range that went out to 954 yards so regardless of whatever else is said here, I was having some FUN.

              Set up the chrono and shot groups at 200 yards.
              Rem 700 SPS with heavy 20" barrel was shooting 2500 to 2540 fps. Same load in an LR308 26" bull barrel was shooting 2600 to 2650 fps.
              Groups were identical at 200 yards but then again the 700 has a nice trigger and the LR doesn't For me, the difference started to show up at 4-500 yards. Getting on to steel beyond 500 was still consistent with the longer barrel/ higher velocity but got tougher with the short barrel.
              So my answer would be
              "Depends on what you want to do with said rifle"
              For 1-200 yards which is typical for my area's public ranges either of those barrels guns will give me something to work on. If I'm humping said gun all around heck, an AK would be fun.

              Comment

              • #52
                tanks
                Veteran Member
                • Dec 2014
                • 4038

                Originally posted by JMP
                ...

                And, WTF is all this 1:10" twist crap in a .308. 1:12" is what you want with a full size barrel.
                A lot of the heavier non-lead bullets (copper or brass) are longer and need a faster twist to stabilize.
                "... when a man has shot an elephant his life is full"- John Alfred Jordan
                "A set of ivory tusks speaks of a life well lived." - Unknown

                Comment

                • #53
                  JMP
                  Internet Warrior
                  CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                  • Feb 2012
                  • 17056

                  Originally posted by FMJBT
                  Maybe for little princess bullets. Real bullets do better with 1:10
                  If you want to do better with heavier bullets in 30 cal, you should step up to a 30-06 or .300WM, etc.
                  Originally posted by Terryw123
                  This one is even better. I'm not saying 18 is the way to go but, it works. Mine is 23" 1:11.25
                  With a shorter barrel, you will want a bit faster twist because the rotational inertia that stabalizes a rifle projectile in flight is more commonly determined as a function of time, not length of rotation. 1:12" is spinning faster at 3000fps that a 1:10" at 2000fps.

                  The 1:11.25" twist is the most common; it is not a bad rate, but it has been perpetuated by decades of rifling mythology.
                  Originally posted by tanks
                  A lot of the heavier non-lead bullets (copper or brass) are longer and need a faster twist to stabilize.
                  That is the one exception where you'd want a faster twist for stabilization, but you'd use these for areas that prohibit lead. In .30 cal, monolithic bullets do not exhibit a significant increase in performance over lead jacketed. Moreover, this is mitigated because you will need to use a LIGHTER bullet with a monolithic bullet compared to a lead jacketed bullet since copper and an alloy of copper and zinc is almost half as dense as lead, so the lighter bullet occupies quite a bit of space. Now, the slower twist often gains the edge when you have replace the lead bullet with a monolithic bullet that occupies the same volume.

                  Comment

                  • #54
                    Shakey
                    Member
                    • Oct 2011
                    • 412

                    Originally posted by JMP
                    With a shorter barrel, you will want a bit faster twist because the rotational inertia that stabalizes a rifle projectile in flight is more commonly determined as a function of time, not length of rotation. 1:12" is spinning faster at 3000fps that a 1:10" at 2000fps.
                    Why are you so tied to 1:12 as "best"? Have you seen the stability numbers for bullets like:
                    Berger 155.5
                    Berger 185 Hybrid
                    Sierra 190SMK
                    any of the new Sierra tipped bullets
                    any of the Hornady Amax bullets

                    You don't have to be shooting 200+ grain bullets to have stability problems with a 1:12 twist, particularly under "bad" atmospheric conditions (sea level, cold, low speed). A lot of the new VLD/Hybrid/etc bullets can have stability issues at 1:12, which is why the bullet manufacturers recommend 1:11 or 1:10 for the new bullets. Heck, John Whidden uses 1:10 in his Palma gun and I think we can all agree that he knows a thing or two about shooting a 308.
                    Originally posted by CSACANNONEER
                    I love it when all my flyers land close to each other.

                    Comment

                    • #55
                      milotrain
                      Veteran Member
                      • Apr 2011
                      • 4301

                      Originally posted by Shakey
                      Why are you so tied to 1:12 as "best"? Have you seen the stability numbers for bullets like:
                      Berger 155.5
                      Berger 185 Hybrid
                      Sierra 190SMK
                      any of the new Sierra tipped bullets
                      any of the Hornady Amax bullets

                      You don't have to be shooting 200+ grain bullets to have stability problems with a 1:12 twist, particularly under "bad" atmospheric conditions (sea level, cold, low speed). A lot of the new VLD/Hybrid/etc bullets can have stability issues at 1:12, which is why the bullet manufacturers recommend 1:11 or 1:10 for the new bullets. Heck, John Whidden uses 1:10 in his Palma gun and I think we can all agree that he knows a thing or two about shooting a 308.
                      I don't think he is saying "best" but I might be wrong. The 155.5 has to be going below 2600 FPS to not stabilize in a 1:12. Or it has to be arctic. You know you aren't supposed to use cream of wheat as a powder right? It's just for fire-forming.

                      The 185 is indeed on edge, but if you get it moving you should be ok, except in humid winter matches at sea level.
                      weg: That device is obsolete now. They replaced it with wizards.
                      frank: Wait a minute. There are more than one wizard? Is [are?] the wizard calibrated?

                      Comment

                      • #56
                        ktmguy
                        Senior Member
                        • Oct 2014
                        • 537

                        If I could I would pull the 16 inch barrel off my (308) scar 17 and I'd put on the 13 inch barrel I really want and at the distances I shoot the hogs won't know the difference. But thats never happening in this great state.

                        Comment

                        • #57
                          Shakey
                          Member
                          • Oct 2011
                          • 412

                          Originally posted by milotrain
                          I don't think he is saying "best" but I might be wrong. The 155.5 has to be going below 2600 FPS to not stabilize in a 1:12. Or it has to be arctic. You know you aren't supposed to use cream of wheat as a powder right? It's just for fire-forming.
                          Ha! Man, that explains so many of my issues...

                          Originally posted by milotrain
                          The 185 is indeed on edge, but if you get it moving you should be ok, except in humid winter matches at sea level.
                          Like, say, Sac Valley between November and March?

                          My point, and disagreement with JMP, is that you PROBABLY will not have problems with 1:12 but you will DEFINITELY not have problems with 1:11 or 1:10, so why go with 1:12 when the cost is the same and there is no* downside?

                          *Okay, okay, there MIGHT be a downside if you are shooting really old military ammunition. But if you are doing that then you need to start talking about 0.299 bores and other stuff that, like parachute pants and Vanilla Ice, we left behind in the early 90s.
                          Originally posted by CSACANNONEER
                          I love it when all my flyers land close to each other.

                          Comment

                          • #58
                            milotrain
                            Veteran Member
                            • Apr 2011
                            • 4301

                            Originally posted by Shakey
                            My point, and disagreement with JMP, is that you PROBABLY will not have problems with 1:12 but you will DEFINITELY not have problems with 1:11 or 1:10, so why go with 1:12 when the cost is the same and there is no* downside?
                            weg: That device is obsolete now. They replaced it with wizards.
                            frank: Wait a minute. There are more than one wizard? Is [are?] the wizard calibrated?

                            Comment

                            • #59
                              highpower790
                              Veteran Member
                              • Jun 2013
                              • 3481

                              IM willing to bet the majority of those with the M14/M1A don't have 1/12 twist barrel,but I do, just for the reason of being able to shoot accurately with bullets 125gr to 175gr.
                              Last edited by highpower790; 01-27-2015, 4:18 PM.
                              Keep it simple!

                              Comment

                              • #60
                                Shakey
                                Member
                                • Oct 2011
                                • 412

                                I love this idea. "Sorry guys, I'd like to go shooting tomorrow but my barrel won't work in cold weather." Combine that with "my powder is too temperature sensitive" for hot days and you have equipment-related excuses for not shooting when it is too cold or too hot!
                                Originally posted by CSACANNONEER
                                I love it when all my flyers land close to each other.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1