Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

RPR "trainer" $799

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    baih777
    CGN/CGSSA Contributor
    CGN Contributor
    • Jul 2011
    • 5680

    Originally posted by Wren1911
    The chassis is the same as the larger calibers.I own a 6.5 RPR and had a .223 RPR.The 223 take weird property non-pmag magazines.They are ar10 length mags with modified feed lips to hold the smaller 223 rounds.Ruger scrapped my 223 but I still have the mags.I use them in my 6.5 to single feed.
    The mags might be Accurate Mag. My 223 AICS by Accurate Mag are like that. Never did try to modify them for a longer bullet.
    Been gone too long. It's been 15 to 20 years since i had to shelf my guns. Those early years sucked.
    I really miss the good old Pomona Gun Shows.
    I'm Back.

    Comment

    • #17
      sigstroker
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Jan 2009
      • 19923

      The ones I saw in the article were plastic. I think.

      Comment

      • #18
        baih777
        CGN/CGSSA Contributor
        CGN Contributor
        • Jul 2011
        • 5680

        AICS 223 mags are polymer.
        Been gone too long. It's been 15 to 20 years since i had to shelf my guns. Those early years sucked.
        I really miss the good old Pomona Gun Shows.
        I'm Back.

        Comment

        • #19
          ShaunBrady
          Member
          • Oct 2011
          • 420

          The AICS pattern magazine Ruger uses in that rifle have an internal length of 2.6". With the Ruger 3 lug bolt, they feed 223 better than any bolt gun I've handled.

          I bought one of these rifles, discarded the factory barrel without firing a shot, and replaced it with a 26" 1:7 Heavy Palma Bartlein.

          I load 75 ELDm to 2.525" and 3030 fps. The ballistics are surprising. Barrel life should be great and ammo components are cheap.

          Comment

          Working...
          UA-8071174-1