I am planning picking up a Remington 783 scoped. I still have not decided between the .223 and the .308
My question is the unbranded pre-mounted and bore-sighted 3-9x40mm scope good enough for the .308 round's longer distance capabilities?
My thinking is... if the scope is not good enough for distances greater than 200 - 300 yds then maybe I should just get the .223 version.
I gather from reading that the .223 ammo is half the price, but limited in range compared to the .308.
I just want to make a good decision since I do not get to buy a new gun very often. I am big guy and not worried about the kickback of the .308 round.
BTW I know nothing about scopes, I am cross eye dominant and just now getting into long guns.
edited...
I just found an article that said the scope is a Trijicon Accupoint, 3-9X
My question is the unbranded pre-mounted and bore-sighted 3-9x40mm scope good enough for the .308 round's longer distance capabilities?
My thinking is... if the scope is not good enough for distances greater than 200 - 300 yds then maybe I should just get the .223 version.
I gather from reading that the .223 ammo is half the price, but limited in range compared to the .308.
I just want to make a good decision since I do not get to buy a new gun very often. I am big guy and not worried about the kickback of the .308 round.
BTW I know nothing about scopes, I am cross eye dominant and just now getting into long guns.
edited...
I just found an article that said the scope is a Trijicon Accupoint, 3-9X

U.S Coast Guard - So others May live. 

Comment