What is the deal with 30.06?
In casual reading and then a bit of looking because it piqued my curiosity it seems there is a wide variety of opinion on range, power, usefulness and whether it is 'obsolete' or not.
Some say it is pointless now because .308 does everything 30.06 does and does it better and the only way to get a better round or go farther is 300WM.
Others say the 30.06 splits the difference between .308 and 300WM giving better velocity and range than the .308 with less recoil and wear than the 300WM.
I've read that it is obsolete because it's loaded for older rifles and that means the same or less velocity than modern .308 ammo.
Again others say there are factory loads that surpass the .308 and handloads that approach 300WM.
Is it that much of a contentious caliber?
What's the real story?
In casual reading and then a bit of looking because it piqued my curiosity it seems there is a wide variety of opinion on range, power, usefulness and whether it is 'obsolete' or not.
Some say it is pointless now because .308 does everything 30.06 does and does it better and the only way to get a better round or go farther is 300WM.
Others say the 30.06 splits the difference between .308 and 300WM giving better velocity and range than the .308 with less recoil and wear than the 300WM.
I've read that it is obsolete because it's loaded for older rifles and that means the same or less velocity than modern .308 ammo.
Again others say there are factory loads that surpass the .308 and handloads that approach 300WM.
Is it that much of a contentious caliber?
What's the real story?


Comment