...

[Sactown23]

Another option: http://speedsights.com/night-sights

I put these on my wife's 9mm, and they're awesome. (She wanted diamonds for her birthday!) The sight picture is crystal clear and quickly picked up.

[tacos3]

Fiber optics for range toys and 3-dot tritiums for carry/hd gun.

+1 I have Trijicon HDs on all my carry guns, G19, G26, Shield and P226. I have Truglo's on my G34 which is a range/comp gun.

[Malaprop14]

Similar thread I started in the sights forum, which ended up pretty much being about these two:

http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=956708

[TheExiled]

TFO. I have had several sets of both and now only one of the Trijicons and the rest the TruGlos. The Trijicons arent bad by any stretch, but the Truglos are brighter in day and night plus they look better (imo) if you care about that

Just be sure youre getting the TFO, not the Truglo Bright Sights, which dont have the tritium and are nonexistent at night

[Malaprop14]

I personally don't think the TFOs look better, just different, after looking at both in person. Not sure I need brighter at night since I can already see the HDs easily from across the room. Another guy I spoke to online said Chevy vs Ford, he's got both on various firearms and likes both and said I wouldn't be disappointed with either.

[451040]

I've had both.

HDs > TFOs

[Bill Steele]

I have probably had every kind of sight known to man on one of my pistols or another. For tactical sights I prefer TruGlo TFO's.

I have them on all my 10mm Glocks and shoot extremely hot loads through them, I have never had a failure on one. Having said that, I do think the fiber optic construction can make them a little more fragile than a traditional style night site like Trijicon or Mepro's. I shoot the TruGlo's better, so I am willing to live with that possibility.