Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Glock 9mm Single Stack Revealed?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Whatisthis?
    replied
    Originally posted by digdug74
    I'll believe it when I see it.

    But if I see it, I'll probably buy it (assuming it's the same size as the 42, which it might not be).
    A 9mm round will not fit into the magwell as it is too long (front to back). They could use slightly different magwell dimensions to make it fit... but otherwise it'll be slightly different size.

    Leave a comment:


  • phase1
    replied
    To bad sse ends

    ... I guess I'll just have to move to Arizona for a few months

    Leave a comment:


  • thegamettt
    replied
    them two remind me of rex-kwon do.

    Leave a comment:


  • -hanko
    replied
    "Looks like Glock is following the Apple sales strategy. $500 for a .380 that you really didn't want, then release the 9 for another $500" is a comment from the same story on ARF, and a comment that I echo.

    Shield does the same thing extremely well at a good price.

    Leave a comment:


  • punisheryayarea
    replied
    Maybe Shot Show 2015?

    Leave a comment:


  • Malaprop14
    replied
    While it is more likely that they could actually put it out now in light of the G42, the likelihood seems extremely small that they will while the G42 is still selling well. When the G42 sales level out, then maybe it would happen.

    If they do, I'll probably buy one too

    Leave a comment:


  • Glocker23
    replied
    Originally posted by digdug74
    I'll believe it when I see it.

    But if I see it, I'll probably buy it (assuming it's the same size as the 42, which it might not be).
    Will at the minimum be heavier and have more recoil. Can't change physics.

    Leave a comment:


  • digdug74
    replied
    I'll believe it when I see it.

    But if I see it, I'll probably buy it (assuming it's the same size as the 42, which it might not be).

    Leave a comment:


  • punisheryayarea
    replied
    Originally posted by nikki#2
    ^^^ Why not both? Because no one would buy the G42.
    Many still will buy it, but will they use it

    Leave a comment:


  • nikki#2
    replied
    ^^^ Why not both? Because no one would buy the G42.

    Leave a comment:


  • Glocker23
    replied
    Did all sales of the P238 stop when the P938 was released?

    Leave a comment:


  • hyeg35
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Gutz
    replied
    I hope it does come out so all the G42 fanboys eat it! LMAO!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • nikki#2
    replied
    Sorry Lenny... I know you are a very successful master of marketing, but...

    A single-stack 9mm Glock has been a 'red hot' topic of discussion for way too long (prior to the release of the G42)
    for me to believe that Glock is about to introduce a new product that will essentially eliminate healthy G42 sales
    and piss off current G42 owners... Although I certainly do understand why resellers like the Glock Store would LOVE it!

    I'm certainly not holding my breath to SSE it. As stated, there are good alternatives currently available.

    Sure, Glock will eventually release a single-stack 9mm when Glock believes the timing is right from a business and sales perspective...
    It's release date will not be based on customer demand. Glock has already clearly demonstrated that fact with the release of the G42.

    BTW Lenny.... I'm sure Tammy does a great job as an 'official Glockstore spokesperson'.
    But, she actually is capable of speaking, right? Can't tell from the video or marketing pics.

    Last edited by nikki#2; 08-06-2014, 3:48 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lone_Gunman
    replied
    We'll, it makes sense for Glock to release a 9mm/.380 single stack this way. How many people who bought the .380 would have bought the 9mm instead, but since there wasn't one went ahead and got the .380?

    If a 9mm comes out months later how many who bought the .380, but really wanted the 9mm, will pony up more cash for the 9mm version?

    More sales.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
UA-8071174-1