Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.45 and .40 input please.
Collapse
X
-
From a ~ 4" Bbl...Not sure if this has been mentioned in the prior threads, but could the perceived recoil difference have something to do with .45acp being a subsonic round (~900fps) vs. 40s&w generally being supersonic (~1,200fps)?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
230 gr. .45 ACP +P ~900 fps.
180 gr. .40 S&W ~ 1000 fps.
Both are sub-sonic, both have ~ 400 FtLbs of Energy atm.
Caselaw"We're surrounded. That simplifies things."
- Col. LB "Chesty" Puller USMC - Chosin ReservoirComment
-
3 easy steps to solve your problem:
1. Buy the gun you like.
2. Load your own rounds to the powder charge you like.
3. Ignore everyone, just
and think they're
.
As for self defense: No matter what round you choose, as long as it goes bag, it really does not matter.
Comment
-
I think the saying that the .45ACP is a nice or solid 'push to the rear' has been way over-used and abused..45 ACP is a much smoother shooting round, in my opinion than either 9mm or .40.
When shooting my G21 there is less muzzle jump than my 9mm Glocks, just a solid push to the rear. I can keep shots on target much faster.
All guns should be Glocks, all Glocks should be model 21s in .45 acp.
All hand guns recoil in the same manner. All handguns or at least those with a slide, will always make your primary hand/wrist bend and flex. Look at the video that Vuurwapen Blog on Youtube made showing 3 different CZ pistols in 9mm, .40 and .45. They all recoil in the same fashion. The difference is the angle of the muzzle or bore line before and after the shot.
In his video, the 9mm had the least amount of recoil while the .45 was in 2nd place and the .40 was in first (as far as who had the greatest angle variation).
Also, look at the video from Mr Colion Noir where he did a rapid fire string of shots between the .45 and the 9mm. The .45 was STILL all over the place and that is the reason why he switched to a 9mm for his carry round.
Between the 3 calibers, nothing will beat the 9mm as far as reduced recoil and the ability to get back on target faster.
Edit: I'm a proponent of the .40.....and I hate Glocks.My YouTube Project: http://www.youtube.com/user/BlueonGoldZ/videosComment
-
LOL, another one who uses the 'Short & Weak' fallacy but then says you can go with a 9mm.My YouTube Project: http://www.youtube.com/user/BlueonGoldZ/videosComment
-
-
What if someone can't afford to shoot the .45?
What if someone feels that the 9mm, in ball ammo, may not be enough and are uncomfortbale with that?
Not a 'dumb inbetween caliber'.My YouTube Project: http://www.youtube.com/user/BlueonGoldZ/videosComment
-
For awhile I shot only .40, then I sold them all and went all 9mm. I just picked up a .40 on a trade and want a .45. I prefer the feel of 9mm for fast shot to shot times, but a 1911 in .45 is a smooth operator that I must soon buy. I think .40 is harder to be consistently accurate with as a newer shooter due to it's snappier recoil profile.NRA Lifetime Member
1A-2A = -1AComment
-
What you need to know is people who spew this kind of gibberish do not know that what they call "Short & Weak" is more powerful than the most standard pressure 45ACP in combat loads.Comment
-
There are good reasons to go with a 40S&W, but being easier to shoot is not one of them.For awhile I shot only .40, then I sold them all and went all 9mm. I just picked up a .40 on a trade and want a .45. I prefer the feel of 9mm for fast shot to shot times, but a 1911 in .45 is a smooth operator that I must soon buy. I think .40 is harder to be consistently accurate with as a newer shooter due to it's snappier recoil profile.
There is no "free lunch" in physics. 40S&W / 357 SIG do need more discipline to shoot well, which may require more training to reach the same level of accuracy and speed. You don't get something for nothing.
If it is for security use, it is generally not for shooters with a "casual/occasional" training style.
However, if a person wants to run a 40S&W and maintain a regular training schedule, I do not find it to require significantly more effort than regular training with a 9mm either. 45ACP will be even more expensive and not any more easier to train with.Last edited by Grayblue; 12-26-2013, 4:33 PM.Comment
-
There are good reasons to go with a 40S&W, but being easier to shoot is not one of them.
There is no "free lunch" in physics. 40S&W / 357 SIG do need more discipline to shoot well, which may require more training to reach the same level of accuracy and speed. You don't get something for nothing.
If it is for security use, it is generally not for shooters with a "casual/occasional" training style.
However, if a person wants to run a 40S&W and maintain a regular training schedule, I do not find it to require significantly more effort than regular training with a 9mm either. 45ACP will be even more expensive and not any more easier to train with.
how did anything your wrote have anything to do with what I wrote? just curious.NRA Lifetime Member
1A-2A = -1AComment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,866,414
Posts: 25,143,506
Members: 357,024
Active Members: 4,368
Welcome to our newest member, Wynn52.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 11169 users online. 36 members and 11133 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.



Comment