Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

1911 in Condition 0

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #76
    redcliff
    Calguns Addict
    • Feb 2008
    • 5676

    Whoa people, please stop quoting me out of context.
    Originally posted by Res
    I carry condition 1 always. But I wouldn't call condition 0 stupid. condition 0 is pretty much the same as a Springfield XD.
    My comment was a direct response to another members post regarding 1911's which I in fact quoted in my response. The Springfield XD has two safeties that are removed by pulling the trigger plus the grip safety.
    Originally posted by SilverTauron
    In point of fact,in his book "To Ride,To Shoot Straight,and to Speak the Truth" the esteemed Colonel advocated Condition 0 for DA/SA pistols.It's not a recommended procedure today,but Col. Cooper did favor it over the "crunch-tick" method of pulling through the DA shot.
    My comment was a direct response to another members post regarding 1911's which I in fact quoted in my response. Col. Cooper was a well known advocate of "Condition One and Only" for 1911's, which is what I thought was the topic of this thread.
    Originally posted by SNCaliber
    I think that most people that carry a 1911 naturally train themself to engage the manual safety so I don't think it's an issue, plenty of 1911 carriers carry in condition 0.
    The post I was responding to.
    Originally posted by redcliff
    Really? I've net met anyone that did something that stupid. Jeff Cooper called for "condition one and only" for a lot of good reasons.
    The post you guys took out of context as I was clearly responding to SNCaliber's post addressing carrying 1911's in Condition 0.
    Last edited by redcliff; 09-05-2013, 12:12 PM.
    "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
    "What we get away with isn't usually the same as what's good for us"
    "An extended slide stop is the second most useless part you can put on a 1911"

    "While Ruger DA revolvers may be built like a tank, they have the aesthetics of one also,
    although I suppose there are a few tanks which I owe an apology to for that remark"

    Comment

    • #77
      Lead Waster
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Sep 2010
      • 16650

      So a thinly disquised Glock troll?


      I would say that Gaston might have a point in an ideal world where something happens, you pull the gun out of the holster, point and pull the trigger. A double action revolver would fit the bill nicely. Or a DA only semi-auto.

      But life is not ideal so we need safeties. As mentioned, even the Glock has plenty of safeties.

      What if a cop is carrying in this condition 0 in his holster and a bad guy grabs for the gun? The cop might find a nice hole in his leg.
      ==================

      sigpic


      Remember to dial 1 before 911.

      Forget about stopping power. If you can't hit it, you can't stop it.

      There. Are. Four. Lights!

      Comment

      • #78
        SNCaliber
        Veteran Member
        • Mar 2012
        • 3222

        sorry guys I'm an idiot, I got confused what condition 1 and 0 was, I was referring to condition 1
        -Sang

        Comment

        • #79
          ausala
          Member
          • Oct 2012
          • 159

          Originally posted by Lead Waster
          But life is not ideal so we need safeties. As mentioned, even the Glock has plenty of safeties.

          What if a cop is carrying in this condition 0 in his holster and a bad guy grabs for the gun? The cop might find a nice hole in his leg.
          Doesn't even have to be a bad guy doing a grab for that to happen.

          "It doesn't have an external safety or anything like that," said Lt. Sierra Brucia with the department. "The gun functioned how it was supposed to. When the trigger was pulled, the gun went off."

          Comment

          • #80
            Res
            Senior Member
            • May 2006
            • 1633

            Originally posted by jonzer77
            The XD has a longer and heavier pull compared to a 1911 so it's not the best comparison. Don't the XDs have a trigger safety as well?
            I see your point with the longer heavier pull.

            The XD does have a trigger safety, but a 1911 is just as safe when your finger is off the trigger. I'm not a big believer in trigger safeties.

            Originally posted by redcliff
            Whoa people, please stop quoting me out of context.

            My comment was a direct response to another members post regarding 1911's which I in fact quoted in my response. The Springfield XD has two safeties that are removed by pulling the trigger plus the grip safety.
            Redcliff, I don't think I quoted you out of context. You said said you never heard of someone stupid enough to carry in con. 0. I said in my opinion that its not that stupid...

            also yes the the xd does have a grip safety. so does a 1911
            yes an xd does have a trigger safety. but i've heard of more nd's with trigger safeties than without.

            edit to add: I own both 1911's and XD's. Safeties are always engaged on both
            --------------------------------------------
            Dusty Miller
            Sacramento

            Matthew Jackson Miller: 8-6-07 to 10-15-07
            sigpic

            Comment

            • #81
              Gutpile66
              Member
              • Mar 2013
              • 434

              Originally posted by colossians323
              memory reflex drill
              Yes. Thumb sweeps on draw no matter which weapon due to home draw practice with my Kimber. But, I still feel safer carrying a Glock . . . because of the trigger.

              I was trained to "load" the Glock trigger as I push the pistol forward during sight acquisition. My Kimber will fire if I use the same method.

              Comment

              • #82
                scott_kart
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2013
                • 534

                Originally posted by postal
                XRMike.

                Silver tauren....

                All this "what if" blah blah blah.....

                I would honestly be more concerned about having a handgun with a mag disconnect than a manual safety...

                There was a guy in Socal for security at a high school in LA somewhere. He was attacked by a student who whacked him upside the head with a baseball bat. He drew his primary carry gun, and seeing stars... fumbled the gun- hit the mag release. Pointed the gun... no boom.

                It should have fired... There was still 1 in the chamber, but that mag disco *for your safety* did not allow it to fire.

                He drew a backup handgun from an ankle holster and shot and killed his attacker.

                So.... does your fancy no safety glock gen 4 have a mag disco?????
                I hope you carry a backup....

                This is real life example of a 'safety feature' --- IE mag disco almost costing someone their life. It shouldnt be too hard to find on the net... it was only a couple years ago somewhere around LA county at a public high school.
                No Glocks have a "mag disco", they have a magazine release and yes, it will fire if there is a round in the chamber and no magazine in the well.

                Comment

                • #83
                  redcliff
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 5676

                  Originally posted by Res
                  Redcliff, I don't think I quoted you out of context. You said said you never heard of someone stupid enough to carry in con. 0. I said in my opinion that its not that stupid...
                  Well, you quoted me out of context again. What does an XD have to do with my comment regarding 1911 condition 0 carry being stupid? How are you disagreeing with something I never said in the first place?
                  "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
                  "What we get away with isn't usually the same as what's good for us"
                  "An extended slide stop is the second most useless part you can put on a 1911"

                  "While Ruger DA revolvers may be built like a tank, they have the aesthetics of one also,
                  although I suppose there are a few tanks which I owe an apology to for that remark"

                  Comment

                  • #84
                    tacticalcity
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 10916

                    If you're gonna follow the Glock line of thinking, carry a Glock or Glock like gun. There is a reason the trigger pull on the Glock is heavier than that of a 1911 and there is a reason the Glock has a trigger safety. Your 1911 does not have those things and thus you need to engage your thumb safety in order to carry it safely. Stop trying to outsmart the world's leading experts on the subject of the 1911 - it is not a Glock.

                    Comment

                    • #85
                      wu_dot_com
                      Senior Member
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 1362

                      Originally posted by tophatjones
                      As long as you have a thumb, you can flick the thumb safety, from any position even with an awkward grip. If my thumb is shot or cutoff, I'll give you that one.

                      When you train with long arms, don't you practice flicking the safety off when you shoulder the gun? Or do you plan to never have the safety on?
                      you dont have to give him any. when your thumb is shot off, your hand wont be able to hold any gun for that matter.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      UA-8071174-1